Who should retire or be traded

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • NMWBloods
    Taking Refuge!!
    • Jan 2003
    • 15819

    #91
    Originally posted by Swans500
    For ****s sake....he just returned from injury.
    Then (i) he shouldn't have returned yet and (ii) he shouldn't have played on Rusling for the entire game and (iii) he shouldn't have tried to outrun everyone!

    Originally posted by Swans500
    You dont recall those weeks of frustration with the "fill-in" backline and all the calls for Leo and Kennelly????
    Don't recall any pleas for Barry to return.
    Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.

    "[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."

    Comment

    • swansrule100
      The quarterback
      • May 2004
      • 4538

      #92
      Originally posted by Swans500
      Fow weeks this site was full of pleas for the return of Leo Barry....how much we needed him....then the last 24 hours he is one of the most hated????!!!!
      Hmmmm.
      he seems lost on the footy field, too busy trying to run past everyone.

      Id keep leo but he is out of position. Id take the captaincy off him too. Id get rid of crouch was never most skilful and seems a beat behind the game all the time, keeps getting caught.

      Try and trade jude bolton, who has been one of my favourites but he seems to still be rated highly outside the club and i think hes lost a fair bit.

      I think all players are worth considering for trade for the right deal except maybe goodes, kennelly, okeefe.

      Oloughlin better not be costing us too much salary cap either
      Theres not much left to say

      Comment

      • mcs
        Travelling Swannie!!
        • Jul 2007
        • 8166

        #93
        I just dont konw what to think about Leo Barry.... but his last two years (not helped this year by injury) he hasnt been a shadow on his former self and that glorious year in 05. The rule changes have hurt a lot and he has definetly lost a lot of his pace. If you get run down by Josh Fraser then you have problems in my book- even though that was as much Barry's fault as it was the lack of swans players there to try and help him! Just not sure he will ever be close to the player he once was. Would love to be proved wrong however!
        "You get the feeling that like Monty Python's Black Knight, the Swans would regard amputation as merely a flesh wound."

        Comment

        • Robbo
          On the Rookie List
          • May 2007
          • 2946

          #94
          Originally posted by Swans500
          For ****s sake....he just returned from injury.
          So did Rusling.

          Comment

          • NMWBloods
            Taking Refuge!!
            • Jan 2003
            • 15819

            #95
            Good point - it was just Rusling's third game for the year!

            He's not even all that big either.
            Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.

            "[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."

            Comment

            • SimonH
              Salt future's rising
              • Aug 2004
              • 1647

              #96
              Leo Barry will, and should, play on in season 2008. The occasional screw-up shouldn't be used to obscure the fact he's a great mark, creative, takes 'em on and creates the run from the back that Sydney relies on. We're an inferior team without him. LRT just needs to come on (and stay fit) so that Leo can be released from playing on gorillas.

              MOL would surely be thinking that he's got more to offer after a terrific performance last night. Up to him; we'll have him if he wants to keep going.

              IMO Crouch should be delisted. The way the Swans work is that they persuade senior players (and sometimes not-so-senior players like James and Chambers) who have no future to 'retire'; but Crouch is such a stubborn bugger he would probably have to be cut.

              As for trading, sure, almost anyone is possible; but the trade market is so atrophied these days that it's virtually certain no more than one player will leave or arrive through trading. The real story of 2007 as far as the Swans' list is concerned (apart from who we pick at #11, our highest pick since McVeigh at #5 in 2002) will be how many of a pretty fair number of deserving rookies get promoted, and how those who do get the nod come on in 2008 and beyond.

              Comment

              • jenky28
                Our Edge Is Reg
                • Jun 2004
                • 564

                #97
                My God I Cant Believe Half The Crap I Am Reading On This Thread!
                We Lost 1 Game And Half The Team Must Be Traded Seriously Im Glad Most Of These People Are Not The Coach!
                OUR EDGE IS REG

                Comment

                • shaun..
                  Stuck in Reserves
                  • Jun 2007
                  • 691

                  #98
                  Originally posted by SimonH
                  MOL would surely be thinking that he's got more to offer after a terrific performance last night. Up to him; we'll have him if he wants to keep going.
                  He was awesome last night. One of the better performances on the night and one that actually learnt from a bad performance. Looked faster than some of the younger blokes on the park and I hope he stays for another season!
                  "In some ways we?re less predictable to ourselves and sometimes that can be detrimental because we don?t really know where we?re going" - P.Roos

                  Comment

                  • smasher
                    On the Rookie List
                    • Jan 2005
                    • 627

                    #99
                    How could other young players do well when they don't get a game?Most are untapped at senior level.Look at the number of kids Collingwood played on Saturday night.Where were ours? Sitting in the stands.

                    Comment

                    • Snake
                      On the Rookie List
                      • Mar 2007
                      • 330

                      Originally posted by NMWBloods
                      Why? - for some of them it seems to be a last gasp in a downward spiral.
                      Downward spiral please.....How the fickle supporters come out when the side is out off the finals. Ever heard of a team called Port Adelaide????

                      Delisted:
                      Doyle
                      Phillips
                      Simpkin
                      Rowe

                      Possible Trade:
                      Jolly.

                      Comment

                      • Ajn
                        Draft Scout
                        • Jan 2003
                        • 711

                        Think Simpkin is worth keeping.
                        IMO:

                        Delisted:
                        Doyle
                        Bevan
                        Vogels
                        Shaw (R)
                        Rowe (R)
                        Brennan (R)

                        Possible Trade:
                        Jolly (only cause he wants one)
                        Staying ahead of the game...

                        Comment

                        • ScottH
                          It's Goodes to cheer!!
                          • Sep 2003
                          • 23665

                          Originally posted by Ajn
                          Possible Trade:
                          Jolly (only cause he wants one)
                          So the papers say!!

                          Comment

                          • Wardy
                            The old Boiler!
                            • Sep 2003
                            • 6676

                            Collingwood (along with other teams) have worked us out - and played accordingly. We were a rabble (with the exception of Goodes & MOL) simple as that.

                            I wouldn't know where to start re delisting etc - so I'm not going to try - but here are some random thoughts on the situation we are in.

                            As much as it pains me to say it - we are better off without BBBH - and I was dissapointed with his tantrums "Richo style" when the ball wasnt passed too him even though when he was clearly being marked, and then when he wasnt marked he dropped it. He's back on with the old girlfriend, so this on again off again thing might be having an effect.

                            Bevan - the less said the better. McVeigh - same

                            ROK -- where the hell was he? methinks too busy trying to negotiate a deal for his and the blondes wedding photo's with a womans mag - from all accounts they are wanting about $80,000 (thats the rumoured amount for the wedding extravaganza) the highest bid thus far is about $500 and a free wedding cake from "Guns and Ammo " magazine.

                            Craig Bolton - this guy has held the backline together all year - played his heart out all year, maybe the fatigue of that responsibility finally got to him, he couldnt be expected to carry the can for the back line much longer.

                            Leo - you have lost your mojo, you cant dodge the youngsters like you used to and now its just embarrassing when you try.

                            as I said random thoughts - probably in the wrong thread, but I couldn be arsed to type it again! ;-)

                            anyway - thats it for this season, time for change................

                            As for 2008 - decisions have to be made and I feel that the '05 Grand Final credits have well and truly expired. Next year players should be picked on actual form & fitness (I know it sounds simple) and not on GF perfomances 2 years prior. As for a clean out there are a few players that should have the "its time to go" said too them.

                            But to me it is time that we had a new game plan, the current one (and if there is a plan "B", I have yet too see it) is outdated - its time for Mr Roos and his coaching staff to come up with some new ideas, they are just as responsible for this years performance as the players.

                            But the upside is think of all the money we will all save not going to Melbourne - so it cant be all bad.l
                            Last edited by Wardy; 10 September 2007, 09:09 AM.
                            I used to be indecisive, but now I'm not so sure..................
                            Chickens drink - but they don't pee!
                            AGE IS ONLY IMPORTANT FOR TWO THINGS - WINE & CHEESE!

                            Comment

                            • hammo
                              Veterans List
                              • Jul 2003
                              • 5554

                              Originally posted by Snake
                              Delisted:
                              Doyle
                              Doyle signed a two year contract at the end of 2006 so he won't be delisted.



                              Anyhow, we don't have many genuine ruckmen in the squad so talk of Jolly being traded and Donk delisted is just unrealistsic.
                              "As everyone knows our style of football is defensive and unattractive, and as such I have completely forgotten how to mark or kick over the years" - Brett Kirk

                              Comment

                              • NMWBloods
                                Taking Refuge!!
                                • Jan 2003
                                • 15819

                                Originally posted by Snake
                                Downward spiral please.....How the fickle supporters come out when the side is out off the finals. Ever heard of a team called Port Adelaide????
                                Don't call me fickle - you obviously have blind faith and don't watch any football but the Swans so are oblivious to what happens to other teams after they have an 'up-period'.

                                Yes, Port began a downward spiral - they missed finals last year and finished 12th. They added a heap of young players with just a core of older premiership players. Since 2004 they have lost Bishop, Dew, Hardwick, Wanganeen, James, Kingsley, Montgomery, Pickett, Carr, and Schofield.

                                We've lost just two players from 2005 flag side - Ball replaced by Everitt, and Williams.

                                They have 15 players 25yo or less. We have 8.
                                They will have 2 players 30yo or older. We will have 6.

                                They are now a young quick side. How does that compare to our current team?

                                As for other teams sliding after GF appearances - look at the Kangaroos, Carlton, Essendon, Brisbane, Adelaide. It's normal and requires some degree of rebuilding with younger players. This is especially important for a team that relies on a hard tiring game plan.
                                Last edited by NMWBloods; 10 September 2007, 09:15 AM.
                                Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.

                                "[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."

                                Comment

                                Working...