2007 Scorecard - #3 Jarred McVeigh

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Nico
    Veterans List
    • Jan 2003
    • 11339

    #31
    Originally posted by bedford
    he could never be a superstar he is the ultimate dud,in fact he's the biggest dud since michael parsons.
    there is no way he should be compared to dale lewis.
    if he wasn't from sydney we would never have drafted him,just have a look at some of the players drafted after him.
    suming up he is a no talented gutless dud and it is a disgrace that he is wearing the great gerard healys no.

    minus 2 out of 10
    Ditto.
    http://www.nostalgiamusic.co.uk/secu...res/srh806.jpg

    Comment

    • bigswan
      On the Rookie List
      • Oct 2003
      • 174

      #32
      What sort of a thread is this? Let's p[our a bucketload on the players we don't like. This ios proved by the level of comment. Talk about somerthing more positive or at least in the future.

      Comment

      • goswannie14
        Leadership Group
        • Sep 2005
        • 11166

        #33
        Originally posted by bigswan
        What sort of a thread is this? Let's p[our a bucketload on the players we don't like. This ios proved by the level of comment. Talk about somerthing more positive or at least in the future.
        I think it is probably more of a reflection on the lousy form shown by most of our players during season 2007.
        Does God believe in Atheists?

        Comment

        • Robbo
          On the Rookie List
          • May 2007
          • 2946

          #34
          Originally posted by bigswan
          What sort of a thread is this? Let's p[our a bucketload on the players we don't like. This ios proved by the level of comment. Talk about somerthing more positive or at least in the future.
          You're the one who opened the thread, you're the one who chose to read it. Nobody forced you to do anything. If you don't like it, don't read it?

          Comment

          • ScottH
            It's Goodes to cheer!!
            • Sep 2003
            • 23665

            #35
            Originally posted by Robbo
            You're the one who opened the thread, you're the one who chose to read it. Nobody forced you to do anything. If you don't like it, don't read it?
            It's a forum, your supposed to do that.

            Comment

            • Big Al
              Veterans List
              • Feb 2005
              • 7007

              #36
              Originally posted by bigswan
              What sort of a thread is this? Let's p[our a bucketload on the players we don't like. This ios proved by the level of comment. Talk about somerthing more positive or at least in the future.
              I am positive that McVeigh had a crap season. 2.3/10.
              ..And the Swans are the Premiers...The Ultimate Team...The Ultimate Warriors. They have overcome the highly fancied Hawks in brilliant style. Sydney the 2012 Premiers - Gerard Whately ABC

              Here it is Again! - Huddo SEN

              Comment

              • NMWBloods
                Taking Refuge!!
                • Jan 2003
                • 15819

                #37
                Originally posted by bigswan
                What sort of a thread is this? Let's p[our a bucketload on the players we don't like. This ios proved by the level of comment. Talk about somerthing more positive or at least in the future.
                Let's review 2007 in the future...?
                Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.

                "[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."

                Comment

                • AnnieH
                  RWOs Black Sheep
                  • Aug 2006
                  • 11332

                  #38
                  OK.

                  BMR ... time to average the scores.

                  Seeings RP's disappeared from the face of the work world, I'll go and start up the #4 thread.
                  Wild speculation, unsubstantiated rumours, silly jokes and opposition delight in another's failures is what makes an internet forum fun.
                  Blessed are the cracked for they are the ones who let in the light.

                  Comment

                  • RogueSwan
                    McVeigh for Brownlow
                    • Apr 2003
                    • 4602

                    #39
                    I hate to say it, but 4/10 from me. I have been the lone driver of the bandwagon, but this year it careened into a chasm. Definitely down on previous years.

                    Originally posted by Justice
                    ... If McVeigh is to prosper he needs to be allowed to run free with a focus of crumbing off the pack in the forward line.
                    My feelings exactly. I feel he would be a great small forward, obviously he would need to improve his tackling to keep the ball in the F50.

                    Can these threads be made into a poll?
                    "Fortunately, this is the internet, so knowing nothing is no obstacle to having an opinion!." Beerman 18-07-2017

                    Comment

                    • The Big Cat
                      On the veteran's list
                      • Apr 2006
                      • 2356

                      #40
                      I can get over the fkick in the guts of the Kerr tackle on the boy as he could (should) have won the 2006 GF!
                      Those who have the greatest power to hurt us are those we love.

                      Comment

                      • BeeEmmAre
                        Commentary Team Captain
                        • Aug 2005
                        • 2509

                        #41
                        Jarrad McVeigh scorecard

                        3, 5, 3, 2, 2, -6, 3, 3, 4, -2, 3, 3.5, 0, 1.3, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 2, 2, 3, 3, 3, 0, -2, 2.3, 4

                        Total score = 49.10/270

                        Average = 1.82/10

                        McVeigh fails.

                        Scores so far
                        1. Barry Hall 5.00
                        2. Nick Davis 6.32
                        3. Jarrad McVeigh 1.82
                        Last edited by BeeEmmAre; 14 December 2007, 09:04 AM.
                        "It's up to the rest of the players in the room to make a new batch of premiership players next year," Adam Goodes, triple Bob Skilton Medallist, October 7, 2011.

                        YOU BETCHA!!!!!!

                        Comment

                        • goswannie14
                          Leadership Group
                          • Sep 2005
                          • 11166

                          #42
                          Originally posted by BeeEmmAre
                          Jarrad McVeigh scorecard

                          3, 5, 3, 2, 2, -6, 3, 3, 4, -2, 3, 3.5, 0, 1.3, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 2, 2, 3, 3, 3, 0, -2, 2.3, 4

                          Total score = 49.10/270

                          Average = 1.82/10

                          McVeigh fails.

                          Scores so far
                          1. Barry Hall 5.00
                          2. Nick Davis 6.39
                          3. Jarrad McVeigh 1.82
                          I don't think the minus scores should be included, otherwise Mthews could get -100 from some one which would throw out the integrity of the statistics.
                          Does God believe in Atheists?

                          Comment

                          • RogueSwan
                            McVeigh for Brownlow
                            • Apr 2003
                            • 4602

                            #43
                            Originally posted by goswannie14
                            I don't think the minus scores should be included, otherwise Mthews could get -100 from some one which would throw out the integrity of the statistics.
                            Agreed. If you think the player was @@@@ just give them 0.
                            "Fortunately, this is the internet, so knowing nothing is no obstacle to having an opinion!." Beerman 18-07-2017

                            Comment

                            • AnnieH
                              RWOs Black Sheep
                              • Aug 2006
                              • 11332

                              #44
                              Originally posted by RogueSwan
                              Agreed. If you think the player was @@@@ just give them 0.
                              There are some to deserve to be scored lower than 0.

                              No lower than -10.
                              Wild speculation, unsubstantiated rumours, silly jokes and opposition delight in another's failures is what makes an internet forum fun.
                              Blessed are the cracked for they are the ones who let in the light.

                              Comment

                              • Lucky Knickers
                                Fandom of Fabulousness
                                • Oct 2003
                                • 4220

                                #45
                                Originally posted by goswannie14
                                throw out the integrity of the statistics.
                                LMAO! RWO statistics having integrity??????
                                Hellooooooo

                                Comment

                                Working...