2007 Scorecard - Paul Roos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BeeEmmAre
    Commentary Team Captain
    • Aug 2005
    • 2509

    #46
    Paul Roos scorecard

    6, 6, 4, 4, 10*, 6, 6, 5, 6.5, 5, 6, 7, 7.5, 7, 6, 6, 8, 6, 5.5, 7, 6, 4, 5, 6, 4, 7, 3

    Total score = 159.5/270

    Average = 5.91/10

    Roos passes.
    "It's up to the rest of the players in the room to make a new batch of premiership players next year," Adam Goodes, triple Bob Skilton Medallist, October 7, 2011.

    YOU BETCHA!!!!!!

    Comment

    • Emerald Hill
      bloodstainedangels
      • Jan 2008
      • 103

      #47
      Originally posted by swantastic
      Al i dont care what people say about Roosy in my books he is "GOD" he brought us the premiership we were all after.He has been the most successful coach in my life time and i will never forget the Eade/Roos era.

      There is one point i agree on with a lot of people tho,he does have to learn to evolve with the new bread of game.

      On say that tho you can only do certain things with the cows you have on the paddock.
      Couldn't agree more, Swantastic. I started watching the Swans in 1961 and had to wait 35 years to see them win a final and 44 years to win a flag. The Bloods' performances under Roosy - 5 finals campaigns in 5 seasons, including a PREMIERSHIP, a narrow loss in a Grand Final and a preliminary final loss to the eventual premiers - have been like heaven to Swans supporters of my vintage!!
      "Notwithstanding the sight of all our miseries, which press upon us and take us by the throat, we have an instinct which we cannot repress, and which lifts us up." - Pascal

      Comment

      • Big Al
        Veterans List
        • Feb 2005
        • 7007

        #48
        Originally posted by Emerald Hill
        Couldn't agree more, Swantastic. I started watching the Swans in 1961 and had to wait 35 years to see them win a final and 44 years to win a flag. The Bloods' performances under Roosy - 5 finals campaigns in 5 seasons, including a PREMIERSHIP, a narrow loss in a Grand Final and a preliminary final loss to the eventual premiers - have been like heaven to Swans supporters of my vintage!!
        The ratings were based on performances this year. Someone giving a low rating for this year does not mean they don't appreciate what occurred in the past.
        ..And the Swans are the Premiers...The Ultimate Team...The Ultimate Warriors. They have overcome the highly fancied Hawks in brilliant style. Sydney the 2012 Premiers - Gerard Whately ABC

        Here it is Again! - Huddo SEN

        Comment

        • 2005
          : IN THE OUTER :
          • Dec 2007
          • 604

          #49
          Originally posted by Emerald Hill
          Couldn't agree more, Swantastic. I started watching the Swans in 1961 and had to wait 35 years to see them win a final and 44 years to win a flag. The Bloods' performances under Roosy - 5 finals campaigns in 5 seasons, including a PREMIERSHIP, a narrow loss in a Grand Final and a preliminary final loss to the eventual premiers - have been like heaven to Swans supporters of my vintage!!
          Spot on mate !!
          Rekon too many jump the ship . Last 10 years has been pretty good for us Bloods.We went through so many bad days, last year wasnt as bad as what we all thought.
          Est 1874
          SMFC
          09.18.33.2005

          Comment

          • Wardy
            The old Boiler!
            • Sep 2003
            • 6676

            #50
            Originally posted by 2005
            Spot on mate !!
            Rekon too many jump the ship . Last 10 years has been pretty good for us Bloods.We went through so many bad days, last year wasnt as bad as what we all thought.
            Its not a matter of jumping ship and we have all waited an eternity for a flag. Of course none of us are coaches at an elite level - however having said that, you dont have to be blind Freddy to see that our game plan has not changed in the last 3-4 years - and now that we have been found out, other teams know how to shut us down. It is officially stale!!!! For fear of sounding like a scratched record, look at how Geelong played in 2007, like em or hate em - they played free flowing high scoring footy - the way it should be played and I loved watching them, they got the mix right. The Swans are capable of that, and, on occassion, we have seen it but no where near enough. The stop/start style that Roos advocates is old and just doesnt work as effectively as it used too. Brett Kirk throwing himself into a contest wont last forever.
            Sure Roos got us the premiership no one can ever take that away from him, nor would anyone, however that doesn't mean that his methods/coaching style shouldnt be questioned.

            The times they are a changin.................and Roos & Co have to move with them.
            Last edited by Wardy; 29 January 2008, 06:47 AM.
            I used to be indecisive, but now I'm not so sure..................
            Chickens drink - but they don't pee!
            AGE IS ONLY IMPORTANT FOR TWO THINGS - WINE & CHEESE!

            Comment

            • goswannie14
              Leadership Group
              • Sep 2005
              • 11166

              #51
              Originally posted by Emerald Hill
              Couldn't agree more, Swantastic. I started watching the Swans in 1961 and had to wait 35 years to see them win a final and 44 years to win a flag. The Bloods' performances under Roosy - 5 finals campaigns in 5 seasons, including a PREMIERSHIP, a narrow loss in a Grand Final and a preliminary final loss to the eventual premiers - have been like heaven to Swans supporters of my vintage!!
              Originally posted by 2005
              Spot on mate !!
              Rekon too many jump the ship . Last 10 years has been pretty good for us Bloods.We went through so many bad days, last year wasnt as bad as what we all thought.
              You have both missed the point that Al has made. This rating was for season 2007 only. It has nothing to do with winning the flag in 2005. Yes that was good, but has nothing to do with our performances last season.

              It always pays to read the whole thread so that you know the context that you are talking about.
              Does God believe in Atheists?

              Comment

              • CureTheSane
                Carpe Noctem
                • Jan 2003
                • 5032

                #52
                Yeah, I think the context has been lost here.

                In the big picture, Roos is a hero to all of us.
                He brought us something many of us thought we'd never see.

                But we don't all sit and watch a game and get really frustrated and angry but then sit and logically think..... "hang on, Roos brought us a flag, it's ok for him to be doing an average job now"

                When he's gone, we'll all remember only his marvellous achievement, but in the meantime, he's the current coach, and has to be criticised when the job he's doing isn't percieved to be up to scratch.

                And the point is that there are a LOT of people who say that he hasn't adapted his game plan when it wasn't working.
                The result was what we expected, with an overally average season.
                The difference between insanity and genius is measured only in success.

                Comment

                • 2005
                  : IN THE OUTER :
                  • Dec 2007
                  • 604

                  #53
                  Originally posted by goswannie14
                  You have both missed the point that Al has made. This rating was for season 2007 only. It has nothing to do with winning the flag in 2005. Yes that was good, but has nothing to do with our performances last season.

                  It always pays to read the whole thread so that you know [B]the context that you are talking about.
                  Read what I stated earlier on in the thread, Go Swannie!![/B]

                  All that Im saying here I agree with a couple of others re there
                  comments.
                  Est 1874
                  SMFC
                  09.18.33.2005

                  Comment

                  • liz
                    Veteran
                    Site Admin
                    • Jan 2003
                    • 16738

                    #54
                    Originally posted by CureTheSane
                    And the point is that there are a LOT of people who say that he hasn't adapted his game plan when it wasn't working.
                    The result was what we expected, with an overally average season.
                    Yes and no. I agree with you on the issue of trying to rate 2007 independently of what has gone before. But I don't think it is as straightforward as saying the game plan is out of date, or that more success would be achieved with a different approach. It is no good saying (as someone suggested above) that we should just play like Geelong did last year. The results would probably have been significantly worse than what we saw.

                    The great coaches find a way to win with what they've got available to them. Roos' managed to craft a style that has worked reasonably well - nay, more than reasonably well if you take a multi-year view - without a Judd, Cousins, Kerr, Bartel, Voss, Ablett in the midfield. It made the best use of the positive attributes that his worker bees had, while providing protection to an undersized defensive unit, in turn enabling that defensive group to play to its strength (namely its speed and mobility). It was able to win games because up forward there was a very well knit, talented and diverse forward line able to make very efficient use of limited forward entries.

                    There were a multitude of reasons why it was somewhat less effective in 2007 than before. Some of it was down to injury to a couple of key players. But more crucially, there were too many who didn't play to their maximum. When you don't have the most naturally talented group, you need them all playing close to their best to be successful.

                    Certainly the coach needs to be partly accountable for players not playing to their best. He needs to be accountable for recognising when to lose faith in the old stalwarts and bring in new. He needs to be accountable for developing new talent to replace the old, and for selecting the raw talent with the right attributes to enable a game style to gradually evolve and improve.

                    I don't suggest Roos is above criticism, or that some of these aspects need to be improved upon in upcoming seasons. But I don't think it is as easy as just flicking a switch and suddenly changing the way a team goes about things.

                    Comment

                    • Wardy
                      The old Boiler!
                      • Sep 2003
                      • 6676

                      #55
                      Originally posted by liz
                      Yes and no. I agree with you on the issue of trying to rate 2007 independently of what has gone before. But I don't think it is as straightforward as saying the game plan is out of date, or that more success would be achieved with a different approach. It is no good saying (as someone suggested above) that we should just play like Geelong did last year. The results would probably have been significantly worse than what we saw.

                      Certainly the coach needs to be partly accountable for players not playing to their best. He needs to be accountable for recognising when to lose faith in the old stalwarts and bring in new. He needs to be accountable for developing new talent to replace the old, and for selecting the raw talent with the right attributes to enable a game style to gradually evolve and improve.

                      I don't suggest Roos is above criticism, or that some of these aspects need to be improved upon in upcoming seasons. But I don't think it is as easy as just flicking a switch and suddenly changing the way a team goes about things.

                      Seeing as that "someone" who suggested that they preferred the way Geelong played was me, I would much rather see free flowing footy than that of the stop/start play that has become "the norm" for the Swans in 2006-7. As a spectacle, for me, its not that interesting to watch.
                      Basically, would it hurt to have had a "plan b" in the Roos coaching ideas? because last year he didnt have the plan B that was required. He continued to use out of form players (even though there were some pretty good youngs kids in reserves who should have been given a chance) and to be honest we were damned lucky to make the 8. But that is only my opinion.
                      I used to be indecisive, but now I'm not so sure..................
                      Chickens drink - but they don't pee!
                      AGE IS ONLY IMPORTANT FOR TWO THINGS - WINE & CHEESE!

                      Comment

                      • CureTheSane
                        Carpe Noctem
                        • Jan 2003
                        • 5032

                        #56
                        Originally posted by liz
                        But I don't think it is as easy as just flicking a switch and suddenly changing the way a team goes about things.
                        I don't see why not.
                        They are drilled in various aspect of the game.
                        Skills - kicking, handball etc.
                        Set plays - kicking out of defense etc
                        Game plan - flooding, manning up etc
                        Fitness
                        Social behavior
                        What to eat
                        etc
                        etc

                        I don't know why Roos isn't able to say...

                        "OK, it's 3/4 time and we're looking like this game is totally gone. The opposition have our number and have researched the way we play and they have us on toast today. Their team also matches up better against us in the one on one side of the game. So guys, instead of playing the way we have all game and all year in our risk free 'wait for a player to be free to take the ball' manner, let's try something different. for this last 1/4 lets take some risks, run with the ball, kick to a competition if we have numbers and get more physical with the opposition."

                        How are the players not going to be able to do this?
                        Sure, they aren't going to be experts at playing this way, but jeez, I'd walk away from the game feeling as if we had a red hot go, even if we still lost.

                        Also, why the hell wouldn't the player be trained in various different game plans.
                        Surely different opposition teams demand different styles of play?

                        The biggest problem is that last year we lived through a season that was like many others before.
                        Seasons where the commentators say "I'd hate to be a Swans fan watching this game" and "It must be frustrating to watch this game as a supporter"
                        That sort of frustration leads me (and others apparently) to look at the coach.
                        And I'm not one to go for the coach as a general rule, I think they get a pretty rough trot with all the sackings etc all the time.
                        It rests on the players to win the game in the big scheme of things, but the coach (or coaching staff) are the ones responsible for defining how the players play the game, and last year I think they played to an outdated game plan that the opposition teams were well and truly aware of.
                        The difference between insanity and genius is measured only in success.

                        Comment

                        • swantastic
                          Veterans List
                          • Jan 2006
                          • 7275

                          #57
                          Originally posted by liz
                          I don't think it is as easy as just flicking a switch and suddenly changing the way a team goes about things.
                          I think your spot on Liz,when a certain style of play is drilled into you its very hard to change.For instance when i played soccer i played in the left back/wing back and left midfield and all those positions have a certain style of play attached to them incorporated into the coaching.This made it very difficult to change positions because it meant a different style of play.

                          For half a season i was played in the right back position and it was a giant head @@@@,because i was so used to having players on my right suddenly they were all on my left it used to confuse the @@@@ out of me.

                          I now they are professionals but they still have a brain like ours no different.
                          Now this is a thread that i would expect on the ego -centric, wank session that is redandwhiteonline.com...

                          Comment

                          • Claret
                            Support Staff
                            • Sep 2005
                            • 1104

                            #58
                            Originally posted by CureTheSane
                            "For this last 1/4 lets take some risks, run with the ball, kick to a competition if we have numbers and get more physical with the opposition."
                            I imagine that he has said that many times over the last year. The hard bit, as Coach, is getting the players to back themselves and do it.
                            And the man who started it all, the Schneiderman . . . . .

                            Comment

                            • Industrial Fan
                              Goodesgoodesgoodesgoodes!
                              • Aug 2006
                              • 3317

                              #59
                              That did actually happen a few times through the year too. There were a few games we let get away and then nearly ran down in the 4th.
                              He ate more cheese, than time allowed

                              Comment

                              • Big Al
                                Veterans List
                                • Feb 2005
                                • 7007

                                #60
                                Originally posted by 2005
                                Spot on mate !!
                                Rekon too many jump the ship . Last 10 years has been pretty good for us Bloods.We went through so many bad days, last year wasnt as bad as what we all thought.
                                Last year was a poor year when you measure it against the expectations of the club and a majority of the fans. Also
                                having realistic expectations of the year ahead does not constitute jumping ship. I think we will struggle this year but my support will continue to be unwavering. A "boat" most of us will be in this year.
                                Last edited by Big Al; 1 February 2008, 09:45 PM.
                                ..And the Swans are the Premiers...The Ultimate Team...The Ultimate Warriors. They have overcome the highly fancied Hawks in brilliant style. Sydney the 2012 Premiers - Gerard Whately ABC

                                Here it is Again! - Huddo SEN

                                Comment

                                Working...