Roos hits back at North's reaction

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BloodNut
    Suspended by the MRP
    • Apr 2008
    • 97

    #16
    Originally posted by Legs Akimbo
    There is no doubt whatsover in my mind that AD and his cronie AD have a personal issue with Paul Roos, which they let influence their responses to issues where Sydney Swans are involved. I would even go so far as to say that their attitude has influenced the conduct of umpires towards the Swans.
    I have my conspiracy theories but i agree that the AFL is allowing the media to perpetrate the anti swans rubbish that they keep spitting in order to destabilize us. The AFL would hate for another Sydney GF or even a flag won playing the style of footy we do. They hate it and want all teams to play like geelong.

    Well f em it's been us against them so far this season.

    Comment

    • reigning premier
      Suspended by the MRP
      • Sep 2006
      • 4335

      #17
      Originally posted by Kanga
      Couldn't agree more about the media beating this story up.

      Laidley has said his piece.

      Roos (sensibly) stayed stum until the penalty - then copped it.

      Brayshaw seems a little ticked off by the AFL suggestion about NM not calling a head count - probably fair enough to complain but that is about it.

      As for mixed messages - The great Irishman sort of suggests video replays would be good, but Roos says no as it would slow the game down....

      Surely there is more to worry about? Such as whatever Todd McKenney got up to on Anzac Day?
      Fair call Kanga..

      Comment

      • Rob-bloods
        What a year 2005 SSFC/CFC
        • Aug 2003
        • 931

        #18
        Glad to say that when Brayshaw was on live with KB and Greg Denham on SEN this morning Denham tied him in knots. He started saying they must get the points then as they did not actually request the points (because they thought the evidence was so overwhelming in their favour) then he said he would accept the decision (heeello) as long as something was done about the rule!!! In other words just a long muddled rant to get himself in the press as an active president (a mini Eddie wannabe).

        What is about the footy show 'personalities' their heads swell immeasurably and they start to believe their own promos. Brayshaw is the latest and one of the very worst in a long line of Ch9 untalented tossers.
        Sports do not build character. They reveal it....Heywood Broun

        I always turn to the sports pages first, which record people's accomplishments. The front page has nothing but man's failures......Earl Warren

        Comment

        • Damien
          Living in 2005
          • Jan 2003
          • 3713

          #19
          Glad Roosey said something.

          He really has to be our PR man when his coaching days are over

          Comment

          • goalkicker
            On the Rookie List
            • Jun 2007
            • 14

            #20
            If onlythe Roos did a head count at the time.Would have been a nice 10goal win....

            Comment

            • goswannie14
              Leadership Group
              • Sep 2005
              • 11166

              #21
              Originally posted by BloodNut
              And i think the Melbourne media atm has way too much influence on how the AFL deals with things. Too many hacks masquerading as journos atm who write articles that influence the mindset of a lot of footy fans, much like how the Herald Sun has a big influence on the thinking patterns of most victorians.
              The only balanced comment I heard was from Jarrod Molloy on ABC radio, he commented that the point was wrongly awarded and should have been a goal, although given the Swans had 19 men on the field it evened out (I don't want to use the "K" word) with it being a draw.
              Does God believe in Atheists?

              Comment

              • Chow-Chicker
                Senior Player
                • Jun 2006
                • 1602

                #22
                I really don't understand what everyone is harping on about in here. Having 19men on the field is illegal. Whether it was intentional or not, or whether the Kangas called for a head count or not, or whether the AFL were too harsh or not are just moot points. This error could have had diabolical consequences as we were in the wrong.

                Comment

                • ROK Lobster
                  RWO Life Member
                  • Aug 2004
                  • 8658

                  #23
                  Originally posted by goswannie14
                  The only balanced comment I heard was from Jarrod Molloy on ABC radio, he commented that the point was wrongly awarded and should have been a goal, although given the Swans had 19 men on the field it evened out (I don't want to use the "K" word) with it being a draw.
                  He and his brother Mick are two of the clueyist blokes going around - though in very differrent ways.

                  Comment

                  • ScottH
                    It's Goodes to cheer!!
                    • Sep 2003
                    • 23665

                    #24
                    Originally posted by Kanga
                    Not sure how having an extra player on the field advantages the opposition - especially if you man up one on one.
                    If we manned up one-on-one, where was our loose man?

                    Comment

                    • Big Al
                      Veterans List
                      • Feb 2005
                      • 7007

                      #25
                      Originally posted by Kanga
                      Not sure how having an extra player on the field advantages the opposition - especially if you man up one on one.
                      The context that was said in was that once the Swans realised White had gone on prematurely and went to defense, they had to pull Jolly off which left McIntosh free to take the kick in. Therefore the Swans are saying that Whites action actually hindered the team.
                      ..And the Swans are the Premiers...The Ultimate Team...The Ultimate Warriors. They have overcome the highly fancied Hawks in brilliant style. Sydney the 2012 Premiers - Gerard Whately ABC

                      Here it is Again! - Huddo SEN

                      Comment

                      • TheGrimReaper
                        Suspended by the MRP
                        • Sep 2007
                        • 2203

                        #26
                        Originally posted by Kanga
                        Couldn't agree more about the media beating this story up.

                        Laidley has said his piece.

                        Roos (sensibly) stayed stum until the penalty - then copped it.

                        Brayshaw seems a little ticked off by the AFL suggestion about NM not calling a head count - probably fair enough to complain but that is about it.

                        As for mixed messages - The great Irishman sort of suggests video replays would be good, but Roos says no as it would slow the game down....

                        Surely there is more to worry about? Such as whatever Todd McKenney got up to on Anzac Day?
                        Kanga, there must be something wrong with me I think. That is the most sensible post you have made since I have known ya!

                        I agree 100%

                        Comment

                        • Triple B
                          Formerly 'BBB'
                          • Feb 2003
                          • 6999

                          #27
                          Originally posted by Big Al
                          The context that was said in was that once the Swans realised White had gone on prematurely and went to defense, they had to pull Jolly off which left McIntosh free to take the kick in. Therefore the Swans are saying that Whites action actually hindered the team.
                          Exactly
                          Driver of the Dan Hannebery bandwagon....all aboard. 4th April 09

                          Comment

                          • liz
                            Veteran
                            Site Admin
                            • Jan 2003
                            • 16758

                            #28
                            I've just seen a snippet of Brayshaw speaking on the matter on FSN. Spluttered when he claimed he was just fighting for his club and a quarter of a million supporters...

                            Comment

                            • goswannie14
                              Leadership Group
                              • Sep 2005
                              • 11166

                              #29
                              Originally posted by liz
                              I've just seen a snippet of Brayshaw speaking on the matter on FSN. Spluttered when he claimed he was just fighting for his club and a quarter of a million supporters...
                              Does God believe in Atheists?

                              Comment

                              • ScottH
                                It's Goodes to cheer!!
                                • Sep 2003
                                • 23665

                                #30
                                Originally posted by liz
                                I've just seen a snippet of Brayshaw speaking on the matter on FSN. Spluttered when he claimed he was just fighting for his club and a quarter of a million supporters...
                                He just reminded me of Laidley, the way he was talking.

                                Comment

                                Working...