Shaun Burgoyne out for 3 weeks
Collapse
X
-
-
As I understand it you are wrong in that the player WENT OFF THE LINE TO TAKE OUT THE OPPONENT. and Williams was angry BECAUSE his player was "following instruction."Williams has a good point here.
The situation comes up quite a bit...... loose ball on the ground, two players going at it, clear intent is to extract the footy while keeping their feet allowing an effective disposal once in possession. At the last split second it's clear one player is going to get there first and the opposition player has to change his path to avoid head high contact, which of course he can't do because he is already so committed. Head high contact ensues, tribunal, etc. etc.
If the opposition players pulls right out of the contest he feel the wrath of the coach, he could hang right back and then put a hard legal tackle on once the player gains possession (notice a lot of players doing this now) but shouldn't the ball be the object????"I'll acknowledge there are more talented teams in the competition but I won't acknowledge that there is a better team in the competition" Paul Roos March 2005Comment
-
what if I'm running backwards to adjust my position, and ROKlobster bends down to do up his shoelaces and I run in to his head?
This was the wrong decision. It was a ridiculous decision. But the AFL do have it right on head high contact. Free kick was all it deserved.Comment
-
Don't quite understand you there.....if it's worthy of a free kick, but knocks the player unconscious, then that would make it worthy of a report - surely!
A player has gone off the line, played the man not the ball, contacted to the head and knocked him unconscious....I'm struggling to see how anyone could complain about a suspension in these circumstances."I'll acknowledge there are more talented teams in the competition but I won't acknowledge that there is a better team in the competition" Paul Roos March 2005Comment
-
Don't reckon he 'played the man'. The ball was within 5 metres and all he did was turn his body.Bloods
"Lockett is the best of all time" - Robert Harvey, Darrel Baldock, Nathan Burke, Kevin Bartlett, Bob SkiltonComment
-
Roll your eyes all you like, but Roos would never stand up for Hall like that.
It's all innuendo, stealth comments and implications, all said with a smug curl of the lip.
Which is fine, and probably the correct way to go about things, but he has never shown that sort of passion in defense of a player that Williams did.The difference between insanity and genius is measured only in success.Comment

Comment