Tony Shaw and Liam Pickering

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • satchmopugdog
    Bandicoots ears
    • Apr 2004
    • 3691

    #16
    Originally posted by Blood
    No commentator is going to be completely unbiased or objective, that much is obvious. But Wallsy is pretty close to the mark. Analytically, he is without peer in my opinion.

    Anyhow, i've padded up so hit me with your best shot
    The main beef I have with him is his voice. The inflexions or lack of and the pitch produce a whining tone that cuts right through me like a bandsaw. Cometti has lower ,more rounded and smoother tones that are more calming. Walls is no fool etc but his voice!!!!
    Listening to Kevin Bartlett yesterday, which I haven't done for ages,he has a high little thin voice but he manages to keep the whining tone out of it and to me still sounds like an excited lover of football. His voice could be terrible but it is saved by his attitude...Walls' is not.
    "The Dog days are over, The Dog days are gone" Florence and the Machine

    Comment

    • royboy42
      Senior Player
      • Apr 2006
      • 2078

      #17
      The main ball by ball commentator yesterday with Pickering and the unspeakable Shaw is a bloke called Casey. His constant references to term number 1,term number 2 drive me crazy. Also refers to goal number one, goal number 2 etc. Combined with the idiocy and verbal diarrhoea of Shaw, it drove me to turn the sound off.

      Comment

      • bloodboy
        Mmmmm...Donuts
        • Jul 2003
        • 352

        #18
        Yeah, I can't take Casey seriously knowing that he has come from an NBL calling background...I almost expect him to start saying the players have a shot from 'outside the paint' or 'downtown'...!
        Go you mighty BLOODBOYS!

        Comment

        • Nico
          Veterans List
          • Jan 2003
          • 11343

          #19
          Originally posted by BSA5
          Haven't watched the game yet, but just generally, Shaw is turning into another Robert Walls. And I'm surprised Pickers is being mentioned; I've always found him to be a decent commentator. Not fantastic, but certainly not bad, and I've never really noticed any bias on his part before towards any side.

          Well have a squizz at the replay because I reckon Pickering was at best as bad as Shaw. I don't normally bother about the commentators but Pickering never gives us a rap and rarely tips us. On radio it is clear he doesn't rate us.
          http://www.nostalgiamusic.co.uk/secu...res/srh806.jpg

          Comment

          • AussieAnge
            On the Rookie List
            • Sep 2003
            • 1057

            #20
            Originally posted by Blood
            No commentator is going to be completely unbiased or objective, that much is obvious.

            Anthony Hudson does a good job in the objectivity stakes. Listen to his commentary in the 2005 QF you wouldn't have known he was a Cats fan.

            FWIW I listened to the ABC commentary yesterday which was OK apart from them getting our players mixed up. Kept calling Moore Buchanan and vice versa.
            Bring it on!

            Comment

            • top40
              Regular in the Side
              • May 2007
              • 933

              #21
              [QUOTE=AussieAnge;383621]Anthony Hudson does a good job in the objectivity stakes. Listen to his commentary in the 2005 QF you wouldn't have known he was a Cats fan.

              That Anthony Hudson broadcast of the Swans-Geelong 2005 Semi-Final at the SCG was an example of extraordinary, outstanding professional broadcasting. Knowing Hudson's public support of Geelong, his commentary performance that night was on par with Nick Davis' 4th quarter on field performance.

              Now, bringing Tony Shaw into the context to the Swans-Geelong 2005 Semi-Final. The only painful incident of that wonderful September night, was listening to the final moments of the 3MMM broadcast. Upon the final siren sounding, you hear the "professional" Tony Shaw bemoaning, "No that's wrong, that's not right, that's wrong".

              I wonder. Does this man just hate Sydney? Is he still recovering as an ex-coach for Collingwood for all the floggings that Plugger gave to the Pies during the late 1990's?

              Comment

              • Destructive
                Football Terrorist
                • Jan 2003
                • 976

                #22
                [QUOTE=top40;383632]
                Originally posted by AussieAnge
                Anthony Hudson does a good job in the objectivity stakes. Listen to his commentary in the 2005 QF you wouldn't have known he was a Cats fan.

                That Anthony Hudson broadcast of the Swans-Geelong 2005 Semi-Final at the SCG was an example of extraordinary, outstanding professional broadcasting. Knowing Hudson's public support of Geelong, his commentary performance that night was on par with Nick Davis' 4th quarter on field performance.

                Now, bringing Tony Shaw into the context to the Swans-Geelong 2005 Semi-Final. The only painful incident of that wonderful September night, was listening to the final moments of the 3MMM broadcast. Upon the final siren sounding, you hear the "professional" Tony Shaw bemoaning, "No that's wrong, that's not right, that's wrong".

                I wonder. Does this man just hate Sydney? Is he still recovering as an ex-coach for Collingwood for all the floggings that Plugger gave to the Pies during the late 1990's?
                I had to turn the sound down on the telly, the commentary was so one-eyed. You would have thought that Port was the only team playing yesterday, if you listened to those two jokers.
                The Destructive Dan Experience - Featuring Teal.
                Add me on Facebook - Danny Pinsuti (Except Suzi Olsen and her split personalities.)
                238 AFL Games.

                Comment

                • hot potato
                  Sir Ashmole Gruntbucket
                  • Jun 2007
                  • 1122

                  #23
                  I've been missing Clyton Grybas all season. Still dont understand what really happened.
                  "He was proud of us when we won and he was still proud of us when we lost' Tami Roos about Paul Sept 06.

                  Comment

                  • Allymay
                    On the Rookie List
                    • Sep 2007
                    • 298

                    #24
                    For biased commentating, I think the 5AA guys come pretty close. Had the radio on yesterday coz had to take Mum to the airport and listened to the last few minutes of the game. ABC in Perth took in the 5AA call. Everything with those guys was Port this Port that.
                    What made me laugh was when young Schmidt (I think it was) who had a shot at goal to put Swans 6 pts up. The commentators...er...Port supporters I should say, were saying any score could win it, "but he could miss everything and then Port can score a goal!!"
                    Next comment was a disappointed sounding "Oh." I actually thought he had missed the shot but then they said, "He's kicked the goal." Dead silence.
                    I thought I could hear them cry when McVeigh sealed it!!!
                    I might have a slight drinking problem. My husband asked me to toast some bread for him...so I raised my wine glass and said "Here's to bread!"

                    Comment

                    • top40
                      Regular in the Side
                      • May 2007
                      • 933

                      #25
                      [QUOTE=Schneiderpig;383637]For biased commentating, I think the 5AA guys come pretty close.

                      At least essentially those guys were broadcasting for a South Australian audience.

                      Reviewing the last 3 minutes of the game, here's a selection of the bias television commentary.

                      Luke Ablett makes an attempted tackle on a fallen Troy Chaplin for Port. Chaplin has falling down whilst attempting the gather the ball on the ground. The replay shows Ablett making no or extremely slight contact with Chaplin. Shaw's comment:
                      "He's out on his feet. I think the umpire was again blind sighted... That's a fee kick every day of the week"

                      Later, McVeigh back kicks to Micky O. In his attempt to take the mark, Salopek for Port smashes him on the head with his fists. Micky O falls to the ground.
                      Pickering's comment:
                      "Oh well done Salopek".

                      Comment

                      • Allymay
                        On the Rookie List
                        • Sep 2007
                        • 298

                        #26
                        You're right Top40. Makes me wish they had Talkback so I could ring them and say "Stuck it right up 'em!!" (Apologies to EJ Whitten)
                        I might have a slight drinking problem. My husband asked me to toast some bread for him...so I raised my wine glass and said "Here's to bread!"

                        Comment

                        • BSA5
                          Senior Player
                          • Feb 2008
                          • 2522

                          #27
                          Originally posted by Blood
                          No commentator is going to be completely unbiased or objective, that much is obvious. But Wallsy is pretty close to the mark. Analytically, he is without peer in my opinion.

                          Anyhow, i've padded up so hit me with your best shot
                          Walls is to AFL commentating what Chappell is to the cricket. Walls' comments consist of either inane, overcomplicated bull@@@@ which bears no significant relevance to the game, stating the complete and utter obvious, or complaining about flooding (usually against the Swans). Add to that his tone of voice and delivery, and he is by far and away the worst commentator in the game.
                          Officially on the Reid and Sumner bandwagon!

                          Comment

                          • Big Al
                            Veterans List
                            • Feb 2005
                            • 7007

                            #28
                            Someone correct me here but did I hear Casey say that Mcveigh was found "naked" inside 50 (It was the 1st Qtr I believe). No wonder McVeigh played well, no Port player wanted to "tackle" him. (pun Intended)
                            Last edited by Big Al; 25 May 2008, 03:55 PM.
                            ..And the Swans are the Premiers...The Ultimate Team...The Ultimate Warriors. They have overcome the highly fancied Hawks in brilliant style. Sydney the 2012 Premiers - Gerard Whately ABC

                            Here it is Again! - Huddo SEN

                            Comment

                            • mcs
                              Travelling Swannie!!
                              • Jul 2007
                              • 8177

                              #29
                              you are totally correct Big Al I cracked up when he said that- who in his right mind says that in that context!

                              Im glad it wasnt only me who thought yesterdays commentary was absolutely pathetic! Was unbelievably biased I thought, but made it even sweeter to get the victory in the end. We were the better team imo over the 4 quarters and deserved the points, but if you had listened to the commentators then Port shoudl of won by 15+ goals they were that awesome.
                              "You get the feeling that like Monty Python's Black Knight, the Swans would regard amputation as merely a flesh wound."

                              Comment

                              • reigning premier
                                Suspended by the MRP
                                • Sep 2006
                                • 4335

                                #30
                                Originally posted by Blood
                                No commentator is going to be completely unbiased or objective, that much is obvious. But Wallsy is pretty close to the mark. Analytically, he is without peer in my opinion.

                                Anyhow, i've padded up so hit me with your best shot
                                Well You asked for it..

                                Walls is a @@@@wit. He might not be biased (Though I think he is somewhat), but the way he changes his mind in the course of a game is apalling. At one stage he'll be saying a team needs to "play on at all costs", next minute he starts saying they have to "hold the ball and control the tempo".... One minute a player is "out of form and off the pace..." Next thing, they are the "form player of the team and the team can't win without them!!"

                                Comment

                                Working...