-
-
yeah jude bolton, great game, put his body on the line a number of times, and the 2 goals, 2nd best on ground behind goodes
Hall was a little frustrated at times but 4 goals, hes getting back into form.
nail biter of a gameComment
-
What a mark that was pure Bevo. Can't wait to see it on replay. If anyone has the means could you put it up on YouTube?Comment
-
The must win game that had to be won1
Even without the last 5 minutes, watching Adam Goodes in flight even with restricted run is awsome.
It's what we take from the game.
Barry Hall cannot take a contested mark without a push so he needs to get kicks upfield where he is not marked by 3 and someone else needs to step up - tonight Goodes.
The ruck was a real worry but its hard against a guy who seems immovable and 8 feet tall.
17 goals was also a highlight... not so much a shutdown as a shootout.
Go swans
PS Will Mal pay this year or in the leg that bad?Comment
-
Just good to get the win.
The Good
Jude : Fair dinkum crack , wanted to win all night, Well done Nuts.
Bevo : Not just a great mark , but a very good game.
LRT : Hope his bashers on here get off his back
Goodes : 8 is enough , great return.
Hall : Better again , this week.
Crouchy : Really pleasing to see.
The Bad
We are still a fair way off the mark , lets be honest,
Good win tonight , though will know where we are at in the next 2 weeks
Spida : I wont even comment on him.
Noggy : His form is a worry.
The situation on : Malceski . Micky O . Leo : We need all 3 back next week.
Anyway , good to get up and read the paper tomorrow knowing we had a win and that hopefully we can improve and get going again
Go Bloods !!Est 1874
SMFC
09.18.33.2005Comment
-
It was great to see a win again but I would be hugely surprised if it changes anything. We are not capable of beating collingwood, geelong or hawthorn. The side was rabble like at some stages of tonight's game. The defence if it has lrt at its heart will continue to be beaten. B2's form is strangely disappointing. Keneally is a shadow of is former self as is Hall who has just got to stop getting caught behind and using his hands. I don't think grundy or brennan were particularly good but i reckon they both do a job on second tier players. The midfield remains our one area of strength - kirk was fabulous, jude remains an enigma in his ability to play some very very good football, moore, jack, and bird are all improving players.Comment
-
by the way how can anyone say people ought not bash LRT on that performance. Pavlich led him to the ball on every occasion, and when he didn't there were two one on one contests where pavlich just pushed him out of the contest - once leading to a goal to tarrant from a handpass and once to a goal for johnson in the last quarter.
he is a liability except when he plays on resting ruckmen and as demonstrated by john anthony in the collingwood game even then he strugglesComment
-
I agree that LRT didn't perform well at the back today - he was beaten on the lead many times, and also in the one-on-ones for the mark. It looks to me like he needs some more upper-body strength - he just gets shoved off the ball.
But, he took a great mark on the left wing there near full time that allowed us to wind the clock down. I was at the game behind the posts, so I really only saw half his game. I really think he's better ar RHB. Hope he grows with experience.Diabolical, triabolical, quadrabolical...Comment
-
Pavlich was great. I actually wanted Freo to kick the last goal & win. They deserved to, despite Goodes, Bolton, J and a few others. Poor ROK, he was ripped off all night. Ted is another Bolton, C in the making - another good game. I have aged 2 years tonight.Comment
-
Wasnt the convincing win I'd hoped for to turn our season around, but I'd sum up the game as 2 evenly matched sides where one had more to gain by winning and had that extra 1% drive when it counted.
Spida did well in the last. LRT bashing is silly. Pavlich has been canning the best recently. Goodes to FF - there is our future from 2011 - 2014.Comment
-
Terrific game by Jude Bolton. Must be the best of his career.
I disagree with anyone who says Kennelly was ordinary. He gave us run from the backline all night.
It just shows what we can do by kicking the pill long to a contest up forward. There were times though when for whatever reason forgot Goodes was kicking goals and stuffed around in the centre and gifted them some goals with horrible turnovers.
At the risk of being bagged, I thought Jared Moore's disposal was very ordinary. He got it enough but continues to miss bread and butter snaps and refuses to go with the first option, whether from a set kick on the mark or on the run. He had at least 3 chances to bring the ball to the square quickly but stopped, propped and was forced to kick hurriedly. Must improve this part of his game.
Brennan's on the run kicking has improved, but he needs to get into the game more. Looks very likely, but just drops off for long periods.
Veszpremi continues to impress and kicks the ball long and strong. Probably not a lot of stats but quality ones.
Interesting that our play makers of the past few weeks in McVeigh and ROK were down, but others stood up. Kirk was just grand.
Bevo was good all night and more than once was very courageous.
Luke Ablett looked overweight, was slow and when he got it had poor disposal. Must make way for Fosdike or Malceski. No one else deserves to be dropped before him and he was a dead set liability out there tonight.Comment
-
Gee Bob, thought Ted was ordinary. He made some terrible disposal errors and continually put others under pressure with hot hand balls.
Your right on ROK, but he wasn't alone. The umpires missed , or did they, many holding off the ball situations against ROK, Bolton and Kirk at stoppages. They were so obvious on the telly.Comment
- If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
- RWO Forum Rules (PLEASE READ FIRST)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Your posts may be deleted, without warning or notification at moderator discretion, for breach of any of the RWO rules set out below. If you have any questions or concerns about post/thread removal, please feel free to PM a moderator or Email us at [email protected]
Do not post your queries on the main boards. Such posts WILL be removed, without further explanation.
Constant breaches of the rules will result in your access to RWO being reduced as the Moderator / Administrator group see fit. RWO uses the vBulletin Infraction System to deal with breaches of the RWO rules. All Infractions have an expiry date. Such an expiry date may be as short as 10 days or as long as 6 months. Multiple infractions, depending on the number of points a member accumulates, WILL result in temporary bans from the site and CAN result in a permanent ban. Please note that some Infractions have an expiry date of "Never" and WILL result in the RWO member being banned from the site immediately.
1) Signatures / Avatars
Keep signatures under 4 lines of standard sized fonts (if you must use large fonts, use just one line) as a courtesy to all users who read the forums.
Do not use signatures / avatars as an opportunity to make jibes at other forum members. This will be considered to be sniping (refer Rule 6 below). You may not refer to another RWO forum member, or quote anything they have written, without permission from that member. Using an anonymous tag does not make it acceptable. If quotes are not removed, we reserve the right to remove them, without notification. If in doubt as to whether something is acceptable or not, don't use it!
2) Spamming
Advertising for personal commercial purposes is NOT permitted. Placing links to sites that other users may find of interest / personal websites is acceptable within reason (ie constantly posting links will be frowned upon).
3) Deliberately avoiding the RWO swear filter
RWO is a site that is accessible by Swans supporters of all ages and walks of life. A swear filter is in place to mask offensive words and phrases. This swear filter contains offensive words and variant spellings of offensive words to stop you from deliberately avoiding the swear filter. Do not attempt to avoid the swear filter through alternate spelling of offensive words. Do not attempt to avoid the swear filter by devising systems to fool the swear filter in its recognition of offensive words.
4) Inappropriate Language / Excessive swearing
RWO is a site that is accessible by Swans supporters of all ages and walks of life. Moderators will let some minor cases through. Anything deemed to be of poor taste or of an offensive nature may be removed at moderator discretion. Consider all members when posting; what you think is funny, not all members will feel the same way.
5) Trolling / Baiting
Deliberately posting on threads in an attempt to stir / bait other RWO users will not be tolerated.
6) Flaming / Sniping / Abuse / Insulting other members
If you have to have a go at someone personally, take it off the boards. Everyone else doesn't need to see your hissy fits. Remember, "Play the ball, not the man". This includes spouses or partners. If you don''t like a post, don't flame, snipe, abuse or insult in response - it makes the job of moderation much harder. Report the post through the forum reporting mechanism (click on the Triangle with the exclamation mark) and let the Moderator / Administrator group deal with it.
7) Legal issuesa) The Moderator / Administrator group will keep a very close eye on threads discussing rumours or anything that could be potentially libellous. Moderators and Administrators are not interested in the chance of legal action regardless of how small - if deemed that there is ANY threat to RWO potentially, we will come down hard on it.
b) Due to potential issues of copyright infringement and the potential legal implications, posting of complete articles is NOT permitted. If necessary, post a link to the article. Where appropriate, you may quote sections of the article to aid in discussion.
c) Due to potential issues of copyright infringement and potential legal implications, posting of links to "live streaming (of AFL games)" and "AFL content" sites that are not AFL endorsed is NOT permitted. Posts with such links will be removed immediately and infraction points will be issued.
d) Freedom of speech does NOT = freedom to slander
8) Racial / Sexual Discrimination / Villification
It is not acceptable for members to engage in racial and/or sexual discrimination / villification. It is not acceptable for members to use terminology in describing race or gender in a derogatory manner. Discussing and disputing the views and opinions of other posters is acceptable. Personally vilifying or abusing others for having certain characteristics, or being a member of a certain group (or because you think they're a member of a certain group), is not. This rule shall apply to any post attacking race, skin colour, ethnic background, gender and sexuality.
See also: ---> RACIAL DISCRIMINATION ACT 1975 - SECT 9
See also: ---> RACIAL DISCRIMINATION ACT 1975 - SECT 18C
9) Prohibited
Anything deemed to be of Adult content or porn related nature will be removed immediately. Selling or offering of drugs, drug references, other than those openly discussed and identified in the press, will also be removed immediately. Breaches of this rule carry the highest infraction points and may result in permanent bans on a first offence.
10) Off-topic Posts
Some members prefer to just read Swans or footy related posts. This is, after all, a SSFC website. Ensure you post threads in the appropriate forum, or they will be moved. While threads will sometimes move away from the original topic, do not deliberately drag a thread away from its original subject.
11) Attachments
Attachments within the size limit prescribed are permitted. However, due to costs associated with uploads/downloads, if you wish to attach a number of files within a thread, or feel that the quality of the attachment is compromised by the file size restrictions, you may wish to use external hosting providers and link to the files there.
12) Moderator / Administrator Group
The Moderator / Administrator group reserve the right to delete or move threads / posts as well as remove signatures / avatars as necessary according to the rules of the RWO forum.
13) Final decisions
Any decisions made around the intepretation of the rules above are entirely at the discretion of the site administrators. Such decisions are final.
14) Vistitors from other sites
You are most welcome to join in discussions on RWO, but remember, you are a GUEST on our site. Abide by the RWO Forum Rules or we WILL ban you.
15) Guidelines regarding Visitors to RWO for RWO members.
Be nice, not all visitors are trolls.a) If they annoy you, ignore them. They want a reaction. Don't give them one.
b) If they are abusive, report them. We will consider banning them. Don't stoop to their level.Bottom line
You are a guest on RWO - You are expected to play by the rules of the house.
Last Update: ScottH, June 22nd, 2008 (Included Spouses/partners in Rule 6)
Last Update: Frog, August 16th, 2010 (Added rule 7c)
Last update: ScottH July 17th, 2011 (Added Rule 7d)
Tweet
© RedAndWhiteOnline.com 2003-
Powered by vBulletin® Version 6.0.6
Copyright © 2025 MH Sub I, LLC dba vBulletin. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2025 MH Sub I, LLC dba vBulletin. All rights reserved.
All times are GMT+10. This page was generated at 02:06 PM.
Comment