I am for the GF always being at the MCG, it's just the way it should be.
As for the night GF, I am not exactly for it, but if the AFL want to continue draining hundreds of millions of dollars out of the TV Networks, expect them to cop awful ratings in Sydney and choose games almost 12 months in advance, they probably deserve a Prime Time Grand Final.
As for the night GF, I am not exactly for it, but if the AFL want to continue draining hundreds of millions of dollars out of the TV Networks, expect them to cop awful ratings in Sydney and choose games almost 12 months in advance, they probably deserve a Prime Time Grand Final.

and the people of Perth would provide an amazing spectacle for 60,000? - er thats a good 40,000 short of what the MCG holds, so I really dont see the AFL wanting to lose close to $10,000,000+ just so as the GF can be held interstate and appease the fine people of WA - that would be financially irresponsible. As a spectacle - the MCG has got the lot - why on earth change it. If anything, as with both the '05 & '06 grandfinals - the neutral ground suited both teams. Also I'm sure if you did a survey of the players they would suggest that anything other than the MCG for the grandfinal wouldnt even be entertained. Its what they all strive for - to run onto the MCG on the last weekend in September. I dont think running onto Subiaco or AAMI stadium has the same appeal.
Comment