We won't put Hall at risk, says Roos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ScottH
    It's Goodes to cheer!!
    • Sep 2003
    • 23665

    We won't put Hall at risk, says Roos

    SYDNEY are likely to be without key forward Barry Hall for Saturday's clash with Fremantle, with coach Paul Roos conceding the club would not take any risks with Hall and his injured groin.
    The decision to take Hall could hinge on how Michael O'Loughlin recovers from his rare half of reserves football on Saturday.
    Source
  • dimelb
    pr. dim-melb; m not f
    • Jun 2003
    • 6889

    #2
    Mickey perhaps, Baz definitely not - we're going to need him later and we have good enough forward options for Freo without him, with White and Grundy both performing well.
    He reminds him of the guys, close-set, slow, and never rattled, who were play-makers on the team. (John Updike, seeing Josh Kennedy in a crystal ball)

    Comment

    • johnno
      On the Rookie List
      • Apr 2008
      • 1102

      #3
      First of all let me start by saying that I want Barry Hall in the team each and every week, I think we need him there in the forward line, but at the same time I'm not too fussed if he is not playing. Is it just me or do we play well/better without him?

      Comment

      • dimelb
        pr. dim-melb; m not f
        • Jun 2003
        • 6889

        #4
        Paradoxically, we often play better. This may be because: 1. It makes us less predictable (e.g. Paul Roos' comments); 2. We are forced to look for other options; 3. At present the other options are pretty good - if Mickey plays next weekend, Freo has to decide who gets their third defender, Mickey, Jesse or Reg, a dilemma that suits us fine.
        I have fond memories of sitting by myself in a local pub at the end of the H&A season 2007 watching us, without Baz, give Hawthorn a football lesson as an adjoining table of Hawthorn supporters gradually went quiet.
        He reminds him of the guys, close-set, slow, and never rattled, who were play-makers on the team. (John Updike, seeing Josh Kennedy in a crystal ball)

        Comment

        • laughingnome
          Amateur Statsman
          • Jul 2006
          • 1624

          #5
          Originally posted by dimelb
          I have fond memories of sitting by myself in a local pub at the end of the H&A season 2007 watching us, without Baz, give Hawthorn a football lesson as an adjoining table of Hawthorn supporters gradually went quiet.
          22 goals, 12 goalkickers. Davis and MOL got 4 each, ROK 3 and Crouch and Eski 2 each. It was a good day
          10100111001 ;-)

          Comment

          • Hartijon
            On the Rookie List
            • May 2008
            • 1536

            #6
            yes and no

            Originally posted by johnno
            First of all let me start by saying that I want Barry Hall in the team each and every week, I think we need him there in the forward line, but at the same time I'm not too fussed if he is not playing. Is it just me or do we play well/better without him?
            I also love to see BBBH in the team but the players lift without him there because they have to. Other options(Grundy) get used and it makes them look good when they succeed.Of course forwards will kick goals and when we win they kick a few.

            I also fully understand BBH's frustration at times playing on the receiving end of Swans passes. I believe in other teams (eg the Crows) he could have kicked 100. He leads well and often.He gets ignored then a long bomb comes to him when he is 2manned or 3 manned.What ever happened to "honouring the lead" which was drilled into us midfielders at schoolboy level. If only they placed the ball in front of Hall at markable height(not hard to do) he would get it 9 times out of ten.Instead,its over his head,at his feet,to his side,too slow etc etc.I admire the way he just keeps at it and leads again and again.

            I believe a fit Barry hall is essential for the Swans final chances but if he is missing a few minor games it doesn't matter that much.

            Comment

            • Plugger46
              Senior Player
              • Apr 2003
              • 3674

              #7
              Originally posted by johnno
              First of all let me start by saying that I want Barry Hall in the team each and every week, I think we need him there in the forward line, but at the same time I'm not too fussed if he is not playing. Is it just me or do we play well/better without him?
              It's ok for a couple of weeks because it makes us less predictable but I have no doubt that we'd be better across a whole season with Hall, than without Hall.

              Our two wins prior to the Carlton game (EF vs North and Rnd 2 vs Hawthorn) he played a significant role in, so we're just as capable with him there.
              Bloods

              "Lockett is the best of all time" - Robert Harvey, Darrel Baldock, Nathan Burke, Kevin Bartlett, Bob Skilton

              Comment

              • hot potato
                Sir Ashmole Gruntbucket
                • Jun 2007
                • 1122

                #8
                Have enjoyed watching games without Hall playing, not because I don't like him, but the options just seem to multiply and other players are freed up to have a go in the foward line.

                HP
                "He was proud of us when we won and he was still proud of us when we lost' Tami Roos about Paul Sept 06.

                Comment

                • Dalai Lama
                  Suspended by the MRP
                  • Nov 2008
                  • 632

                  #9
                  Keep Father Ted at full forward? And even the underpants man could prove a goal sneak against the Shockers?

                  Comment

                  • AnnieH
                    RWOs Black Sheep
                    • Aug 2006
                    • 11332

                    #10
                    On Saturday arvo, when MickyO was signing my hat and badge, he said that we can expect him back in two weeks - Richmond game.

                    We don't need to waste him or Blind Barry at Subi.
                    Wild speculation, unsubstantiated rumours, silly jokes and opposition delight in another's failures is what makes an internet forum fun.
                    Blessed are the cracked for they are the ones who let in the light.

                    Comment

                    Working...