Umpiring

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Darren Thomson
    On the Rookie List
    • Jul 2008
    • 291

    #61
    Standard fare for us though isn't it? The anti Swans bias would appear to extend past the commentary, al the way up to that fat bloke who bagged the way we played in 2005. If there's no influence there, I'll eat @@@@ and die. They want a second tea in Sydney? They better start to even things up on the playing field.


    Paul Roos for PM

    Comment

    • Jewels
      On the Rookie List
      • Oct 2006
      • 3258

      #62
      Originally posted by Darren Thomson
      Standard fare for us though isn't it? The anti Swans bias would appear to extend past the commentary, al the way up to that fat bloke who bagged the way we played in 2005. If there's no influence there, I'll eat @@@@ and die. They want a second team in Sydney? They better start to even things up on the playing field.
      My thoughts exactly!

      Comment

      • Frosty13
        On the Rookie List
        • Mar 2009
        • 56

        #63
        Originally posted by cruiser
        You sound like a sexist pig, as well as a
        Quit your jibba jabba Cruiser.

        Comment

        • Wardy
          The old Boiler!
          • Sep 2003
          • 6676

          #64
          Originally posted by Jewels
          My thoughts exactly!
          Jewels - c'mon - we women are not to have an opinion on anything when it comes to footy dont you know that??? Mind you those who are having a go at us for having an opinion with regards to inconsistent umpiring decisions, you can guarnatee the next time the the free kick count is squarely in favour of the opposition, that these same people will complain the loudest!
          I used to be indecisive, but now I'm not so sure..................
          Chickens drink - but they don't pee!
          AGE IS ONLY IMPORTANT FOR TWO THINGS - WINE & CHEESE!

          Comment

          • goswannie14
            Leadership Group
            • Sep 2005
            • 11166

            #65
            Originally posted by Puppy Eyes
            I don't have a problem with the free kick count. I think generally that reflects the style of game we play. I think the umps are on a hiding to nothing with the rule changes and changes in interpretation etc.

            What I do have a problem with is the discrepancy in the way that the rules differ in how they are applied to Barry Hall as compared with others. A perfect example on Sunday when Hall got flattened in front of goal, as it turned out, one of our blokes roved it and we goaled anyway. But it was too high, in the back, you name it. Not 10 seconds later, a pretty soft free is awarded in front of goal for the Tigers. The other issue I have is that an umpire will stand and watch as Hall is held, pushed, niggled, grabbed, whilst play is at the other end, then the second he turns around to shove back, the little orange bloke is in like the light brigade. It's no wonder Hall flips out with that sort of management, and it's been going on since well before Staker got what was coming last year.
            Interesting that you should talk about the Staker incident. As I was reading your post I thought of the footage of Staker holding Hall, in front of the umpire....no whistle, Hall snaps....the same umpire sees that........and reports him. As I have said before I don't condone the brain snap, but if the umpire had been doing his job and penalised Staker for a clear infringement of the rules, then that punch wouldn't have been thrown.
            Does God believe in Atheists?

            Comment

            • Nthblood
              On the Rookie List
              • Jan 2009
              • 59

              #66
              Originally posted by goswannie14
              Interesting that you should talk about the Staker incident. As I was reading your post I thought of the footage of Staker holding Hall, in front of the umpire....no whistle, Hall snaps....the same umpire sees that........and reports him. As I have said before I don't condone the brain snap, but if the umpire had been doing his job and penalised Staker for a clear infringement of the rules, then that punch wouldn't have been thrown.
              Totally agree, Hall gets the rough end of the pineapple everytime he plays. Certain players in the league only have to be touched with a finger and it's a free kick where other players like Hall get no protection what so ever.

              Comment

              • satchmopugdog
                Bandicoots ears
                • Apr 2004
                • 3691

                #67
                Have had a lot to do with footy umpires in the past(ie. ex-husband) and it is an interesting section of the football industry. Egos play a very important part and the competitiveness within the umpiring ranks is absolutely cut-throat...it makes the players look like ladies blouses.

                They would not be intentionally going out to be against Sydney but if the powers that be dislike that congested /contested style of play the umpires wouldbe doing their best to implement the instructions rather than lose face and be dropped.
                "The Dog days are over, The Dog days are gone" Florence and the Machine

                Comment

                • Darren Thomson
                  On the Rookie List
                  • Jul 2008
                  • 291

                  #68
                  Originally posted by satchmopugdog
                  Have had a lot to do with footy umpires in the past(ie. ex-husband) and it is an interesting section of the football industry. Egos play a very important part and the competitiveness within the umpiring ranks is absolutely cut-throat...it makes the players look like ladies blouses.

                  They would not be intentionally going out to be against Sydney but if the powers that be dislike that congested /contested style of play the umpires wouldbe doing their best to implement the instructions rather than lose face and be dropped.
                  That makes perfect sense to me, how much do umpires get for a game?,


                  Paul Roos for PM

                  Comment

                  • Primmy
                    Proud Tragic Swan
                    • Apr 2008
                    • 5970

                    #69
                    Originally posted by Darren Thomson
                    That makes perfect sense to me, how much do umpires get for a game?,
                    If it was up to me, they'd get peanuts, just right for monkeys.
                    If you've never jumped from one couch to the other to save yourself from lava then you didn't have a childhood

                    Comment

                    • dimelb
                      pr. dim-melb; m not f
                      • Jun 2003
                      • 6889

                      #70
                      Pay peanuts, get monkeys.
                      Pay a motza, get gorillas.
                      He reminds him of the guys, close-set, slow, and never rattled, who were play-makers on the team. (John Updike, seeing Josh Kennedy in a crystal ball)

                      Comment

                      • satchmopugdog
                        Bandicoots ears
                        • Apr 2004
                        • 3691

                        #71
                        Originally posted by Darren Thomson
                        That makes perfect sense to me, how much do umpires get for a game?,

                        Someting to do with thousands

                        (Numbers aren't my forte)
                        "The Dog days are over, The Dog days are gone" Florence and the Machine

                        Comment

                        Working...