Facing some home truths

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Cant turn right
    Warming the Bench
    • Dec 2007
    • 231

    #31
    Originally posted by liz


    If we finish 10th we'll almost certainly get pick 11, with the Dees looking likely to qualify for pick 1 as a priority pick. Unless the Eagles prove crap enough to get a first round priority pick as well, though they'd have to lose pretty much every game from hereon to qualify.
    Considering we got pick 12 last year and Vespa with pick 11 in 2007, that's a pretty bad outcome all round. If the Dees got a first round priority pick how is it that the 10th team doesn't get pick 8?

    Comment

    • ROK Lobster
      RWO Life Member
      • Aug 2004
      • 8658

      #32
      Originally posted by Cant turn right
      Considering we got pick 12 last year and Vespa with pick 11 in 2007, that's a pretty bad outcome all round. If the Dees got a first round priority pick how is it that the 10th team doesn't get pick 8?
      It's rocket surgery.

      Comment

      • connolly
        Registered User
        • Aug 2005
        • 2461

        #33
        Originally posted by DeadlyAkkuret
        Bevan: Time for connolly to admit you're a dud, but fortunately for you we have many and you're probably not the biggest. (Bloody close, though)

        Feel free to add to my rant, or insult me for being overly negative.
        Bevo had one goal kicked on him (which according to some has ended our season), had 18 possessions (11 handpasses - he was getting it out) and made two tackles. Craig Bolton was killed by Franklin had 13 possessions (three handpasses - he was receiving) no tackles, inexplicable seeing he was chasing Buddy all day and no contested marks - from a key position backman! Franklin for the record had 17 disposals, kicked 3 goals - should have been 6 and took 6 contested marks. Malceski's performance was abysmal (as predicted) - had 7 possessions, no tackles, Moore had 6 possessions (50% were effective) and Crouch, our premier small defender according to some had 5 possessions, no contested marks (and dropped an absolute sitter) and made all of one tackle, attempted to trip an opponent for which he should be before the Tribunal, before an aging body gave up on him. Tremendous from a tagger. Honestly how on earth can you single out a kid for a bagging, who played pretty well, compared to some of the garbage that was played by Malceski and Crouch for example.
        Bevo bandwagon driver

        Comment

        • connolly
          Registered User
          • Aug 2005
          • 2461

          #34
          Originally posted by Kanga
          Didn't see Magic being overly effective either yesterday (at least on the TV) This must be his last season....
          Bit harsh there Roo boy. Magic had 15 possessions, including 3 contested marks. Thought he was on his bike all day.
          Bevo bandwagon driver

          Comment

          • pinkemu
            Silver member, not Gold
            • Sep 2006
            • 419

            #35
            Originally posted by DeadlyAkkuret

            Bevan: Time for connolly to admit you're a dud, but fortunately for you we have many and you're probably not the biggest. (Bloody close, though)

            Feel free to add to my rant, or insult me for being overly negative.
            Stop being so @@$@$@$ overly negative.

            Comment

            • Lohengrin
              On the Rookie List
              • Jul 2008
              • 641

              #36
              Originally posted by connolly
              Bevo had one goal kicked on him (which according to some has ended our season), had 18 possessions (11 handpasses - he was getting it out) and made two tackles. Craig Bolton was killed by Franklin had 13 possessions (three handpasses - he was receiving) no tackles, inexplicable seeing he was chasing Buddy all day and no contested marks - from a key position backman! Franklin for the record had 17 disposals, kicked 3 goals - should have been 6 and took 6 contested marks. Malceski's performance was abysmal (as predicted) - had 7 possessions, no tackles, Moore had 6 possessions (50% were effective) and Crouch, our premier small defender according to some had 5 possessions, no contested marks (and dropped an absolute sitter) and made all of one tackle, attempted to trip an opponent for which he should be before the Tribunal, before an aging body gave up on him. Tremendous from a tagger. Honestly how on earth can you single out a kid for a bagging, who played pretty well, compared to some of the garbage that was played by Malceski and Crouch for example.
              Comparing him with C Bolton is going past even your absurd standards.

              As for the other players, Malceski, Moore and Crouch are definitely struggling, as are a number of players. Doesn't mean that Bevan can do no wrong though, which you tediously say each week.

              Comment

              • connolly
                Registered User
                • Aug 2005
                • 2461

                #37
                Originally posted by Lohengrin
                Comparing him with C Bolton is going past even your absurd standards.

                As for the other players, Malceski, Moore and Crouch are definitely struggling, as are a number of players. Doesn't mean that Bevan can do no wrong though, which you tediously say each week.
                Any key defender who takes no contested marks and makes not one tackle while his opponent kicks three goals and has 17 possessions has been carved up. His game compared to anyone's was a shocker
                Bevo bandwagon driver

                Comment

                • Lohengrin
                  On the Rookie List
                  • Jul 2008
                  • 641

                  #38
                  Originally posted by connolly
                  Any key defender who takes no contested marks and makes not one tackle while his opponent kicks three goals and has 17 possessions has been carved up. His game compared to anyone's was a shocker
                  You've become quite delusional.

                  According to some of your recent analysis, our AA CHB, one of the best defenders in the competition, has put in shockers, while your love child can do no wrong.

                  Comment

                  • liz
                    Veteran
                    Site Admin
                    • Jan 2003
                    • 16787

                    #39
                    Originally posted by Cant turn right
                    Considering we got pick 12 last year and Vespa with pick 11 in 2007, that's a pretty bad outcome all round. If the Dees got a first round priority pick how is it that the 10th team doesn't get pick 8?


                    Sorry. My mistake. Can't get my head around this finishing outside the 8 business and I substituted "10th" for "8th" by mistake. You are correct - a 10th place finish will probably get us pick 8.

                    Comment

                    • connolly
                      Registered User
                      • Aug 2005
                      • 2461

                      #40
                      Originally posted by Lohengrin
                      You've become quite delusional.

                      According to some of your recent analysis, our AA CHB, one of the best defenders in the competition, has put in shockers, while your love child can do no wrong.
                      He could have been AAAAA for all i care. He was thrashed.
                      Bevo bandwagon driver

                      Comment

                      • goswannie14
                        Leadership Group
                        • Sep 2005
                        • 11166

                        #41
                        Originally posted by connolly
                        He could have been AAAAA for all i care. He was thrashed.
                        Why is it in recent weeks, when anyone says that Bevan let us down, you start to say that Bolton was worse?

                        In defending Bevan you are doing exactly the thing that you are allegedly trying to defend Bevan from, that is, unfairly criticising another Swans player.
                        Does God believe in Atheists?

                        Comment

                        • ScottH
                          It's Goodes to cheer!!
                          • Sep 2003
                          • 23665

                          #42
                          Originally posted by connolly
                          He could have been AAAAA for all i care. He was thrashed.
                          3 goals scored against B2, by one of the best in the business = Thrashed???

                          Comment

                          • DST
                            The voice of reason!
                            • Jan 2003
                            • 2705

                            #43
                            Certainly blokes like Malceski, Buchanan, Ablett and to a lesser extent Bevan, LRT and Crouch (only by injury) but in all honesty who are their replacements at present?

                            Laidlaw looks like he might finally be close, Smith was close until he had the stuffing knocked out of him a couple of weeks ago, Vez is on his way back, Merideth has now broken his arm, Murphy is not back on the park and Pyke has been in the country less times than I have had hot dinners.

                            That really only leaves Thornton who has had a taste and not much esle. DOK seems to be coming good!

                            We have had a shocking run of injuries over the last 2 to 3 years with our younger players, some of them look like reasonable footballers but without consistent football, they are not ready to play senior football.

                            Saying all that, I hope we see Laidlaw and Smith get games this week for Malceski and Buchanon.

                            DST
                            "Looking forward to a rebuilt, new, fast and exciting Swans model in 2010"

                            Comment

                            • Melbournehammer
                              Senior Player
                              • May 2007
                              • 1815

                              #44
                              We have had a shocking run of injuries over the last 2 to 3 years with our younger players, some of them look like reasonable footballers but without consistent football, they are not ready to play senior football.


                              DST[/QUOTE]

                              perhaps it is karma. our two years on top were recognised as being almost injury free (although willo and lrt in yr 2 did rather give the lie to that

                              Comment

                              • DST
                                The voice of reason!
                                • Jan 2003
                                • 2705

                                #45
                                Originally posted by Melbournehammer
                                We have had a shocking run of injuries over the last 2 to 3 years with our younger players, some of them look like reasonable footballers but without consistent football, they are not ready to play senior football.


                                DST
                                perhaps it is karma. our two years on top were recognised as being almost injury free (although willo and lrt in yr 2 did rather give the lie to that[/QUOTE]

                                Could be, but it must be frustrating to the coaching staff to know they have some decent footballers but are unable to give them an extended run of football in the seniors due to constant stop start injuries.

                                DST
                                "Looking forward to a rebuilt, new, fast and exciting Swans model in 2010"

                                Comment

                                Working...