Hannebery In this Week? Yes!
Collapse
X
-
I think we only have a sample of two though, and the other was a skinny ruckman in a year when we were coming off a GF. So hard to discern what is "normal".Comment
-
Apparantly was down with flu all week. He should get flu every week if he is going to come out and kick 12!I must say that I reckon the club has got it right in most cases - people were calling for Jesse White last year. When he did make his debut, he clearly wasn't ready so he went back to the reserves after a couple of games. Can't explain why he didn't play against Essendon though
I'm looking forward to White playing CHF and not just pinch hitting in the ruck. On more than one occasion this year I've thought he moves more like Pavlich when attacking.We demand rigidly defined areas of doubt and uncertainty.Comment
-
I can't wait to see who is in the team this week, or make that who is not. As you say, McVeigh in, White in, also Hannebery and possibly Buchanan in, which would mean 4 out. If they actually do play the younger ones to gain experience, Pyke and Smith should stay in. What an interesting dilemma that would make!
Comment
-
Can't see how Smith can retain his spot if they bring in McVeigh and Hannebury. On form, Malceski may be the other to miss.I can't wait to see who is in the team this week, or make that who is not. As you say, McVeigh in, White in, also Hannebery and possibly Buchanan in, which would mean 4 out. If they actually do play the younger ones to gain experience, Pyke and Smith should stay in. What an interesting dilemma that would make!
Ablett seems to be the obvious one to drop out for White, since Ablett was in as a forward last year.Comment
-
If White is in for Ablett, then another tall will have to come out given that Pyke came in for McVeigh.Comment
-
Comment
-
-
Last edited by Plugger46; 16 July 2009, 04:24 PM.Bloods
"Lockett is the best of all time" - Robert Harvey, Darrel Baldock, Nathan Burke, Kevin Bartlett, Bob SkiltonComment
-
Not necessarily. You could argue that we went in short against North (losing both White and Hall). Last week partly reinstated the height (ie Pyke for White's old role). Bringing in White this week (to Hall's old role) would just get the balance back to where it was before the North game.Comment
-
Comment
-
Pretty hard to judge his ability on 5 minutes a game.You're probably right but I've heard Roos say on more than one occasion that they use the first year as a 'settling in year'.
I must say that I reckon the club has got it right in most cases - people were calling for Jesse White last year. When he did make his debut, he clearly wasn't ready so he went back to the reserves after a couple of games. Can't explain why he didn't play against Essendon though
Comment

Comment