Trading talk thread

[ScottH]

I also heard Moore's name bandied about alongside those two.

That would be a shame. But then it is trash talk, I mean trade talk, ATM.

[RogueSwan]

That would be a shame...

It would be. I think Bulldog has a big upside if he ever realises it. Just not a big backside like Pebbles and Hanners.

[Armchair Coach]

I also heard Moore's name bandied about alongside those two.

Could easily see him wanting to return to Vic.

[Primmy]

No, not Bulldog. I rate him highly. He is also a leader and I would dislike everybody intensely if they try to move him on. Expect some fairly pithy comments from me if they do people! There, that should do the trick. Make Primmy crabby at your peril!

[dimelb]

No, not Bulldog. I rate him highly. He is also a leader and I would dislike everybody intensely if they try to move him on. Expect some fairly pithy comments from me if they do people! There, that should do the trick. Make Primmy crabby at your peril!

Hear, hear! I'd be pithed too.

[ugg]

West Coast ruckman Seaby set to head to Sydney | PerthNow

WEST Coast ruckman Mark Seaby could be headed to Sydney with Swans coach Paul Roos declaring an interest in the 2006 premiership big man.

Argh, please no.

[10Totti10]

Swans will offer Ablett at best. WC want a second round draft pick = no way. Maybe a 4th round. I dont want him, HOWEVER, he is better than Pyke, and as a backup while Currie develops would be alright.

[Triple B]

It has to be a gee up.

2nd round pick or throw Staker in for a first rounder....they have got to be kidding.

[Robbo]

Why oh why. Could this mean Currie is in trouble? Can't think of another reason why we would need Seaby. Perhaps Pyke or Orreal will go?

I actually rate Seaby and would have him in a heartbeat if we needed a ruckman, but we don't.

[liz]

Please tell me I haven't woken up yet and this is all still a bad dream. Please.

West Coast barely played him, even when Cox was injured. Didn't they learn their "dud ruckman" lesson with Chambers? And a "liucrative 3 year deal"???

If they're determined they need some kind of back-up to Jolly and don't think Currie is up to it next year, then maybe - if he is free and for a one-year try out.

Or we could offer them Hall in a trade!

[Jeffers1984]

God damn.....no way.....are we nutS???

[Jeffers1984]

Maybe it's our ploy to get him via PSD. I dunno, but i'm trying to stay positive about this.

[Cardinal]

I wouldn't be surprised in the least if Moore was moved on. He gets a little greedy and selfish in front of goal which wouldn't be so bad if licked straight .

Well that and the fact my Schneider and Pyke banners are useless now so my Moore banner is sure to be on the scrap heap as well. Why didn't I just go for Goodes.

I also reckon the Dogs will take Hall whatever happens this season - nothing to loose.

[royboy42]

I wouldn't be surprised in the least if Moore was moved on. He gets a little greedy and selfish in front of goal which wouldn't be so bad if licked straight .

Well that and the fact my Schneider and Pyke banners are useless now so my Moore banner is sure to be on the scrap heap as well. Why didn't I just go for Goodes.

I also reckon the Dogs will take Hall whatever happens this season - nothing to loose.

Yesterday's game where the Dogs were crying out for a big body up forward makes me more and more sure that they will target Hall..we'll get something for him after all. Maybe not much, but more than the PSD would produce.
And I can't see the slightest chance of Moore being trade bait..he's a keeper!

[DeadlyAkkuret]

No, no, no, no and @@@@ing HEEEELLLLLL NAW!

No to Staker, no thanks!