Apparently we're after Mumford, offered him a big 3 year contract. Not sure what Geelong would want for him.
Trading talk thread
Collapse
X
-
-
-
Comment
-
This is a once in 10 year deal with Jolly wanting to go home and us having a top 10 pick to have two inside the top 10 and the club is not going to take pass up the opportunity to take 2 highly rated young kids.
The only way I can see us trading 9 would be for a disgruntled top line rukman at another club and that's not likely to come about.
DST
"Looking forward to a rebuilt, new, fast and exciting Swans model in 2010"
Comment
-
If we end up with two top 10 picks, we are likely to use pick 28 for either another ruckman or some sort of package deal for Kennedy and McGlyn and we will end up with our third and the Dogs third for further picks in the draft.
Overall it is looking okay considering our number 1 ruckman is leaving.
DST
"Looking forward to a rebuilt, new, fast and exciting Swans model in 2010"
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Well, it'd be hard to argue now that Roos is taking the easy path in his last year and clinging to the old gang. We may all need a program for R1 to find who our players are.Comment
-
Comment
-
Extra reason to hold firm on the Dogs and squeeze their pills for a better draft pick, if the info about the extra cost of Hall going via PSD to them in here is true.
Carlton Blues reject Collingwood Magpies' offer for Brendan Fevola | The Australian'Delicious' is a fun word to sayComment
-
With Hawks in the mix for Jolly 9 plus player would be fine. Kennedy would be good for us 6 and 9 in the draft could deliver a good small and a tall, I would still like to see another defender come in Nathan Brown plus 14 and 3rd round if Jolly went to Pies may be worth a look, what about Rhan Hooper for some flair up front or Joel Macdonald down back?Sports do not build character. They reveal it....Heywood Broun
I always turn to the sports pages first, which record people's accomplishments. The front page has nothing but man's failures......Earl WarrenComment
-
Can someone fill me in on why everyone is keen to give up draft picks for Kennedy and McGlynn. I looked up their profiles on the Hawks' web site, not having noticed them much in games, and can't see how they are better than any of the young players we already have. If they come to the Swans they will have been promised game time - I can't see why we want them.You don't ban those who supported your opponent, you make them wallow in their loserdom by covering your victory! You sit them in the front row. You give them a hat! Toby ZieglerComment
-
I know Mumford was promising but you can't help but think about our history with Geelong recruits. I remember another undersized ruckman we got from there a couple of years ago.
If we do get him it would be pretty amusing hearing people shout out "Go Mummy!"Official Driver Of The "Who Gives A @@@@ As The Player Will Get Delisted Anyway" Bandwagon.
Comment
-
I reckon Mumford is a very intelligent pick - he's got plenty of upside and Geelong are stuck right on their salary cap limit you would think.
He played quite a few games before being dropped for the finals so he may be keen to move on. He's never going to be a superstar but he could be an honest trier for 6-7 years so he is certainly worth the punt if we have the money.Comment
Comment