The Brendan Fevola poll - yes or no?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • liz
    Veteran
    Site Admin
    • Jan 2003
    • 16742

    The Brendan Fevola poll - yes or no?

    I am not trying to divert the discussion from the trade thread, where there many interesting - and wildly varying - viewpoints re the Fevola question.

    But I am curious to know where the numbers sit in the various different camps.
    134
    Yes, yes, yes. Just go for it Roosey. Give away whatever it takes to get him to the Swans.
    0%
    12
    I'd be happy if he cost us a round 1 draft pick and one of our better players or exciting young prospects
    0%
    4
    Wouldn't mind him, but not for more than a first round draft pick
    0%
    53
    Only if we get him dirt cheap
    0%
    27
    No, no, no. I wouldn't touch him with a barge pole even if he came free in the PSD
    0%
    38

    The poll is expired.

  • Robbo
    On the Rookie List
    • May 2007
    • 2946

    #2
    I don't want him because he's 29, and we are in a rebuilding phase and need to promote youth. We have two quality young key forwards on our list who need games now. If Fevola was 25 I would be all for it, but getting him at 29 while we are at the beginning of a re-build phase would be incredibly stupid.

    Comment

    • DST
      The voice of reason!
      • Jan 2003
      • 2705

      #3
      Throw Carlton pick 38 at 1.45pm on Friday and his full salary paid by us and see what happens.

      DST
      "Looking forward to a rebuilt, new, fast and exciting Swans model in 2010"

      Comment

      • 10Totti10
        On the Rookie List
        • Apr 2009
        • 443

        #4
        Someone just proposed quite possibly the worst deal in history.

        Swans lose : Jolly, Pick 6, Veszpremi, second rounder
        Gain : Jacobs, Fevola, second rounder

        The lost players obviously go to Carlton.

        I cracked myself up after hearing it.

        Comment

        • DST
          The voice of reason!
          • Jan 2003
          • 2705

          #5
          Liz help, I am fighting the good fight over at BF on the Carlton/Collingwood/Sydney draft thread but need help in whacking the Carlton posters.

          Collingwood are providing support but they are mentally challanged at the best of times.

          DST
          "Looking forward to a rebuilt, new, fast and exciting Swans model in 2010"

          Comment

          • DST
            The voice of reason!
            • Jan 2003
            • 2705

            #6
            Originally posted by 10Totti10
            Someone just proposed quite possibly the worst deal in history.

            Swans lose : Jolly, Pick 6, Veszpremi, second rounder
            Gain : Jacobs, Fevola, second rounder

            The lost players obviously go to Carlton.

            I cracked myself up after hearing it.
            Carlton supporters are getting themselves into a lather over at BigFooty.

            It has suddenly dawned upon them that if the club is serious about ridding themselves of Fev their is only one buyer and that is us and we are in a position to take his salary and offer pick 28 and nothing else, possibly only 38 if the Swans recruiting department want a laugh come Friday lunchtime.

            Get over there everyone and pile on the misery for them.

            DST
            "Looking forward to a rebuilt, new, fast and exciting Swans model in 2010"

            Comment

            • Robbo
              On the Rookie List
              • May 2007
              • 2946

              #7
              Is there anyone here who would be OK with Fevola keeping a Johnstone/Currie/White out of the side?

              Comment

              • DeadlyAkkuret
                Veterans List
                • Oct 2006
                • 4547

                #8
                Why would he keep Currie out?

                Comment

                • Robbo
                  On the Rookie List
                  • May 2007
                  • 2946

                  #9
                  Word is that Currie could be played as a tall forward which makes sense given our interest in Mumford.

                  Comment

                  • Cardinal
                    Regular in the Side
                    • Sep 2008
                    • 932

                    #10
                    When Currie is good enough to take Fev's role at FF I'll be happy - until then

                    Comment

                    • DeadlyAkkuret
                      Veterans List
                      • Oct 2006
                      • 4547

                      #11
                      My knowledge of the reserves competition is limited, has Currie shown much up forward when given the opportunity?

                      Comment

                      • liz
                        Veteran
                        Site Admin
                        • Jan 2003
                        • 16742

                        #12
                        Originally posted by DeadlyAkkuret
                        Why would he keep Currie out?
                        It's not inconceivable.

                        If Currie can get fit, he deserves a decent shot at playing plenty of senior footy next year. Roos' fixation with finding another ruckman to replace Jolly suggests he has severe doubts over the short term ability of any of Currie, Pyke or Orreal to provide a meaningful contribution in the ruck. Which suggests that Currie's most likely openings are in the forward line.

                        He'd be a very different kind of forward to Fevola, but there is a limit to how many you could play at the same time, especially if you had Goodes wandering around at CHF.

                        It is possible that White could be tried as a CHF, thus releasing Goodesy back to the midfield. But I am not convinced that White has the endurance or the footy nous at the moment to play that very difficult CHF role, and I think his attributes are best suited as a leading FF from the goal square. Which is also the role at which Fevola particularly excels, though arguably he is capable of playing a bit further out from goal.

                        Comment

                        • liz
                          Veteran
                          Site Admin
                          • Jan 2003
                          • 16742

                          #13
                          Originally posted by DeadlyAkkuret
                          My knowledge of the reserves competition is limited, has Currie shown much up forward when given the opportunity?
                          He is a sensational mark of the ball. Certainly his height advantage is more marked in the ACTAFL but even at AFL level he'd have a significant height advantage over most defenders.

                          It is hard to tell whether he'd be mobile enough to be a really effective senior level forward and until we see him get a go, it is pointless guessing.

                          There may also be issues with his goal kicking accuracy. He missed far too many sitters this year, but the previous season his set shot kicking didn't look too bad. We know he's been carrying groin injuries - it's hard to assess whether those can explain his goal kicking attempts.

                          Comment

                          • DST
                            The voice of reason!
                            • Jan 2003
                            • 2705

                            #14
                            Originally posted by DeadlyAkkuret
                            Why would he keep Currie out?
                            White to CHF, Fev at FF and Currie in the pocket as the third tall.

                            Goodes to the middle as a winger where he plays his best football.

                            Johnston to get a years apprantership as the third tall defender before moving forward in 2011 to replace Currie who will be ready to partner Seaby.

                            Looks good to me.

                            DST
                            "Looking forward to a rebuilt, new, fast and exciting Swans model in 2010"

                            Comment

                            • Robbo
                              On the Rookie List
                              • May 2007
                              • 2946

                              #15
                              Originally posted by DST
                              White to CHF, Fev at FF and Currie in the pocket as the third tall.

                              Goodes to the middle as a winger where he plays his best football.

                              Johnston to get a years apprantership as the third tall defender before moving forward in 2011 to replace Currie who will be ready to partner Seaby.

                              Looks good to me.

                              DST
                              Looks woeful to me.

                              How about we just forget about getting Fevola and start Johnstone in his natural position at CHF, and leave White in his natural position at FF? It's a pretty crazy idea but may just work a treat.

                              Comment

                              Working...