Bradshaw a Swan

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Plugger46
    Senior Player
    • Apr 2003
    • 3674

    Originally posted by Cheer Squad
    My sentiments exactly. It's remarkable how so many people are investing so much hope in Bradshaw.
    'So much hope' - hardly. No-one has stated that he's going to take us to a flag or anything like that, just that the vast majority of us think that he'll be a nice replacement for O'Loughlin while Jesse becomes the player we think he can be.

    The same 'so much hope' argument can be put forward for the two kids. I'm a huge fan of Jesse but he's only played a handful of games and none of us have a clue what Johnston is capable of yet.

    If the kids are good enough, they will get a game.

    We'll have injuries anyway, so that sort of thing tends to sort itself out but the depth is very healthy. The fact that we're even arguing about this is exciting.
    Bloods

    "Lockett is the best of all time" - Robert Harvey, Darrel Baldock, Nathan Burke, Kevin Bartlett, Bob Skilton

    Comment

    • Wazza
      Regular in the Side
      • May 2004
      • 805

      Originally posted by AnnieH
      If he comes to Sydney, do you think they'll release Goodesy from forward duties?
      I want to see Goodesy getting a better run around the paddock (if his body is up to it).

      I thought his was only playing up forward to give his body a break (ok, and to plug a hole).
      Hi Ive been thinking about this as well, I wouldnt have a clue what they intend to do but I would like to see Goodesy stay up forward. He was growing nicely into the role adding real value to our fwd setup and of course the opposition coach has to worry about the matchup.

      IMHO its easier for opposition teams to tag / block him around the ground with sepcialist midfield taggers who are not all ideally suited to playing CHB.

      Playing Goodes as a forward means the opposition has to assign a gun defender for Goodes & Bradshaw possibly leaving White with the 3rd tall, a situation Im sure our coaches would be happy with.

      Im not saying Goodes should move completly away from the midfield role but spend more of his game time as a roving FWD possibly rotating with ROK in the MF.

      Cheers

      Waz

      Comment

      • Brettb
        Pushing for Selection
        • Dec 2007
        • 81

        I can't believe there is even a debate on this issue, the guy is a quality footballer, a proven goal kicker with a wonderful conversion rate, who has fallen into our laps for absolutely nothing.

        Comment

        • Plugger46
          Senior Player
          • Apr 2003
          • 3674

          I'm with you Waz. Keen to see Goodes play at CHF, with the occasional run in the midfield.
          Bloods

          "Lockett is the best of all time" - Robert Harvey, Darrel Baldock, Nathan Burke, Kevin Bartlett, Bob Skilton

          Comment

          • CureTheSane
            Carpe Noctem
            • Jan 2003
            • 5032

            Originally posted by Brettb
            I can't believe there is even a debate on this issue, the guy is a quality footballer, a proven goal kicker with a wonderful conversion rate, who has fallen into our laps for absolutely nothing.
            Me too.

            Can you imagine how RWO would be if the Swans said "no thanks" to Bradshaw?

            There would be millions tearing up memberships, the suicide rate would double, and the mental institutions would all be full.

            My only real though on the matter is how our drafting is regarded now, considering that there is a fair chance that the Swans knew that Bradshaw was a big chance to end up here for zilch.

            Kinda moves us up a bit from a C+ I'd think.....
            The difference between insanity and genius is measured only in success.

            Comment

            • Jewels
              On the Rookie List
              • Oct 2006
              • 3258

              Would there have been this much debate if Micky O had decided to play on another year?

              Comment

              • Go Swannies
                Veterans List
                • Sep 2003
                • 5697

                Originally posted by CureTheSane
                Me too.

                Can you imagine how RWO would be if the Swans said "no thanks" to Bradshaw?

                There would be millions tearing up memberships, the suicide rate would double, and the mental institutions would all be full.

                My only real though on the matter is how our drafting is regarded now, considering that there is a fair chance that the Swans knew that Bradshaw was a big chance to end up here for zilch.

                Kinda moves us up a bit from a C+ I'd think.....
                How many of us are writing from the aforementioned mental institutes? How few are not?

                I don't think we knew he'd be coming up. Rather I don't think Voss knew just how upset his old Premiership mate would be about being used as trade bait. It will be interesting to see how well Brownola functions, but I think we've got the better of the deal.

                Is there a team that has done better out of this trading period than the Swans? It's so spectacular that one wonders if the old firm of Kirk and Roos are going for another shot at it in their last year at the club. But meanwhile, they look to be leaving the club in a very strong position into the future. Win-win is what it looks like.

                Comment

                • msb
                  On the Rookie List
                  • Mar 2006
                  • 827

                  Originally posted by Go Swannies
                  How many of us are writing from the aforementioned mental institutes? How few are not?

                  I don't think we knew he'd be coming up. Rather I don't think Voss knew just how upset his old Premiership mate would be about being used as trade bait. It will be interesting to see how well Brownola functions, but I think we've got the better of the deal.

                  Is there a team that has done better out of this trading period than the Swans? It's so spectacular that one wonders if the old firm of Kirk and Roos are going for another shot at it in their last year at the club. But meanwhile, they look to be leaving the club in a very strong position into the future. Win-win is what it looks like.
                  Bloody oath, we have done unbelievable out of this recruiting period IMHO, and to get a bloke who is nothing less than a very good player for nothing is fantastic!

                  Comment

                  • AnnieH
                    RWOs Black Sheep
                    • Aug 2006
                    • 11332

                    Originally posted by Jewels
                    Would there have been this much debate if Micky O had decided to play on another year?
                    No.
                    We would have been happy for someone with a bit of class coming to help "old" Micky out.
                    Wild speculation, unsubstantiated rumours, silly jokes and opposition delight in another's failures is what makes an internet forum fun.
                    Blessed are the cracked for they are the ones who let in the light.

                    Comment

                    • AnnieH
                      RWOs Black Sheep
                      • Aug 2006
                      • 11332

                      Originally posted by msb
                      Bloody oath, we have done unbelievable out of this recruiting period IMHO, and to get a bloke who is nothing less than a very good player for nothing is fantastic!
                      I said right at the beginning that the swannies are going to come out of trade week smelling like roses.

                      No one believed me.
                      Wild speculation, unsubstantiated rumours, silly jokes and opposition delight in another's failures is what makes an internet forum fun.
                      Blessed are the cracked for they are the ones who let in the light.

                      Comment

                      • Jewels
                        On the Rookie List
                        • Oct 2006
                        • 3258

                        Originally posted by AnnieH
                        No.
                        We would have been happy for someone with a bit of class coming to help "old" Micky out.
                        My point is that Bradshaw is to be the replacement for Mick.
                        So what could possibly be the downside of getting a player of Bradshaws ability to play Micks role for the next two/three years.

                        I just don't understand why EVERY Swans fan isn't doing somersaults at the thought of Bradshaw joining us.

                        Comment

                        • Glenn
                          ROLLLLLL TIDE!!!!!!!!!!!!
                          • Mar 2003
                          • 2443

                          Not mobile enough to be doing somersualts, but to my way of thinking Bradshaw fills a glaring void in the Swans forward set up for 2010 and beyond.
                          Premiers 09,18,33,05

                          "You Irish Twit", Quote attributed to a RWO member who shall remain nameless.

                          Comment

                          • BSA5
                            Senior Player
                            • Feb 2008
                            • 2522

                            Originally posted by Jewels
                            My point is that Bradshaw is to be the replacement for Mick.
                            So what could possibly be the downside of getting a player of Bradshaws ability to play Micks role for the next two/three years.

                            I just don't understand why EVERY Swans fan isn't doing somersaults at the thought of Bradshaw joining us.
                            That was a point I tried to make before. If Bradshaw was already on the list, would you delist him? No. And picking him up for free is basically the same thing.
                            Officially on the Reid and Sumner bandwagon!

                            Comment

                            • Triple B
                              Formerly 'BBB'
                              • Feb 2003
                              • 6999

                              Originally posted by Glenn
                              Not mobile enough to be doing somersualts....
                              What he said ^^^

                              Like has been said before me, I can hardly believe there is any discontent about Bradshaw coming.

                              If we had given up pick 6 or 14 or even a pick in the 20's there could be an argument.

                              He is coming for nothing, zero, zilch. Even his salary is largely irrelevant, we have to find a way to spend a fair chunk of our salary cap anyway.

                              There is no downside to this episode, end of story.
                              Driver of the Dan Hannebery bandwagon....all aboard. 4th April 09

                              Comment

                              • AnnieH
                                RWOs Black Sheep
                                • Aug 2006
                                • 11332

                                We all agree then.

                                We'll be happy with Bradshaw IF we get him.

                                (Unless someone wants to go back through 28 pages and point out those who disagree ... I forget!!)












                                Are we there yet?
                                Wild speculation, unsubstantiated rumours, silly jokes and opposition delight in another's failures is what makes an internet forum fun.
                                Blessed are the cracked for they are the ones who let in the light.

                                Comment

                                Working...