Mitchell watch

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Velour&Ruffles
    Regular in the Side
    • Jun 2006
    • 896

    Originally posted by sfan
    Tom Mitchel is a gun see ball get ball player. His disposal is not elite by foot. It is by hand. Happy to keep but if we can't would love an elite running half back to replace McVeigh with elite disposal. Can't have to many of that type of player.
    Spot on. If we keep him that's good. But I'd much rather lose him than either Heeney or Mills. His kicking is mediocre at best - Hannebery-esque in fact.
    My opinion is objective truth in its purest form

    Comment

    • 707
      Veterans List
      • Aug 2009
      • 6204

      Met with Hawks, not good because given where they will finish I don't know how we get a good trade done, doubt we'd settle for what is looking like pick 17/18. Much prefer he goes to Carlton who have a pick worth getting.

      I'm smelling a bit of Mumford here, we couldn't understand why Swans didn't give Mummy a new contract then it became clear when Buddy is announced. Maybe we are into one of the high profile club jumpers like Prestia, O'Meara, Hurley, Wood etc

      Comment

      • Steve
        Regular in the Side
        • Jan 2003
        • 676

        Maybe he should give ROK a call to see what it's like when Hawthorn say they want you but refuse to actually offer anything decent in a trade.

        It doesn't sound like we pulled or lowered our offer to Mitchell - so even if there are other targets, we felt we could re-sign him and still get them.

        Which is unlike the Mumford situation where we refused to offer a contract all along - knowing we couldn't afford him.

        Comment

        • ernie koala
          Senior Player
          • May 2007
          • 3251

          With Brad Hill heading back to Freo. The Hawks may end up with an extra decent early pick to trade with....

          There is also the ability to trade next years picks as well...So O'Meara may be gettable.

          O'Meara in, Mitchell out....I'd take that anyday.
          Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it's time to pause and reflect... MT

          Comment

          • WauchopeAnalyst
            Regular in the Side
            • Sep 2008
            • 834

            Fyfe..wins his own ball but average foot skills.

            Sent from my SM-G900I using Tapatalk

            Comment

            • Mel_C
              Veterans List
              • Jan 2003
              • 4470

              Originally posted by WauchopeAnalyst
              Fyfe..wins his own ball but average foot skills.

              Sent from my SM-G900I using Tapatalk
              So he would fit in then .

              Comment

              • Kirk31
                On the Rookie List
                • Mar 2016
                • 22

                Originally posted by Steve
                Maybe he should give ROK a call to see what it's like when Hawthorn say they want you but refuse to actually offer anything decent in a trade.

                It doesn't sound like we pulled or lowered our offer to Mitchell - so even if there are other targets, we felt we could re-sign him and still get them.

                Which is unlike the Mumford situation where we refused to offer a contract all along - knowing we couldn't afford him.

                In relation to ROK, I asked him this question a few weeks ago and it was Carlton not Hawthorn. What happened Carlton said no to a trade back then for pick 6.
                I am a proud South Australian Sydney Swans Member - Go BLOODS

                Comment

                • giant
                  Veterans List
                  • Mar 2005
                  • 4731

                  He's certainly a tough kid to get a read on - some of his earlier games this season were outstanding. Then he turns in a game like yesterday, where almost every possession was a waste of energy. Needs to become more consistent, otherwise I'd be more than happy at the club looking at what they might get for him. I suspect that, notwithstanding the CBA furphy, he's pretty much already made up his mind.

                  Comment

                  • Matt79
                    Bring it on!
                    • Sep 2004
                    • 3143

                    Originally posted by giant
                    He's certainly a tough kid to get a read on - some of his earlier games this season were outstanding. Then he turns in a game like yesterday, where almost every possession was a waste of energy. Needs to become more consistent, otherwise I'd be more than happy at the club looking at what they might get for him. I suspect that, notwithstanding the CBA furphy, he's pretty much already made up his mind.
                    Since his manager came out a few weeks back re putting his contract on hold, Mitchell's form has dropped right away. He is mentally else where now which IMO means he has agreed to terms elsewhere too. He's gone.
                    Swannies for life!

                    Comment

                    • Markus26
                      On the Rookie List
                      • Apr 2015
                      • 147

                      Originally posted by Matt79
                      Since his manager came out a few weeks back re putting his contract on hold, Mitchell's form has dropped right away. He is mentally else where now which IMO means he has agreed to terms elsewhere too. He's gone.
                      I have to agree with this. It's a bit sad to watch him play as I'm already resigned to losing him. On the upside, we may get a trade done, or it opens up our line-up to accomodate somebody else. Who knows? Maybe Tommy will be in the red and white next year.

                      Comment

                      • Steve
                        Regular in the Side
                        • Jan 2003
                        • 676

                        Originally posted by Kirk31
                        In relation to ROK, I asked him this question a few weeks ago and it was Carlton not Hawthorn. What happened Carlton said no to a trade back then for pick 6.
                        There's plenty of direct quotes from the time saying otherwise, so not sure how good his memory is, which is strange.

                        Eg.

                        Hawks close in on O?Keefe | The Roar

                        Nocookies | The Australian

                        Comment

                        • waswan
                          Senior Player
                          • Oct 2015
                          • 2047

                          Originally posted by 707
                          I'm smelling a bit of Mumford here, we couldn't understand why Swans didn't give Mummy a new contract then it became clear when Buddy is announced. Maybe we are into one of the high profile club jumpers like Prestia, O'Meara, Hurley, Wood etc
                          This
                          Last edited by RogueSwan; 25 July 2016, 10:40 AM. Reason: fixed quote tags

                          Comment

                          • southsideswan
                            Warming the Bench
                            • Oct 2012
                            • 237

                            Nearly all here have a greater knowledge of Mitchell and AFL then I do but I have a funny feeling that he does not sit well in the team. His original contract was way beyond what would be expected. This appeared to be inflated to match GWS and their big bucket. This was some $450,000 a year to play in NEAFL. He then did wonderful things on the field but Longmire resisted in promoting him. It appeared Tom was not able to do all the things asked of him.

                            If he goes to another Club he will have days where he has great games and there will be a chorus "we should have found a way to keep him". I think on balance and for the team he should not be a top priority.

                            Comment

                            • goswannies
                              Senior Player
                              • Sep 2007
                              • 3048

                              Originally posted by Steve
                              There's plenty of direct quotes from the time saying otherwise, so not sure how good his memory is, which is strange.

                              Eg.

                              Hawks close in on O?Keefe | The Roar

                              Nocookies | The Australian
                              He was pretty emphatic about the Carlton deal. Plus news reports are often just what the reporter wants to write to grab a headline. News reports about buddy had him going to GWS & Tippo going to Queensland at the time. I'd say RO'K would know about his dealings better than the media would have.

                              I'd love to read a book about all the not publicised deals the either fell through or never eventuated.

                              Comment

                              • KTigers
                                Senior Player
                                • Apr 2012
                                • 2499

                                I hope Mitchell stays, but if he doesn't it won't be the end of the world. It's not like we are short of midfielders, and have a number
                                of others (Mills, Heeney, even Hewitt) who can step in when the time comes. I think we're short on running defenders/wingman.
                                In an ideal world we'd have a Nathan Wilson (GWS) style player with a 60M boot on him coming thru about now. Come to think of it,
                                we did have a similar player, until we traded him for Callum Sinclair. And then there was that other guy, the bloke who kicked the winning
                                goal in the 2012 GF. Mal something or another.

                                Comment

                                Working...