Mitchell watch

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • waswan
    Senior Player
    • Oct 2015
    • 2047

    I have a feeling his first contract had him the ability to earn upto 450-500k with a portion attributed to match payments and the cynic in me suggests this is why it is possible to have 60+ Possessions in a ressies game and not get a auto call up

    I remember when C Jones at Saints had a bonus in his contract for playing 16 games and saints kept him out the last few games stranded on 15 games despite him playing in the best so they didn't have to pay his bonus.

    Comment

    • Ludwig
      Veterans List
      • Apr 2007
      • 9359

      We need to free up salary cap space so we can sign Nat Fyfe next year when he becomes a free agent. If we trade Tom Mitchell and the rumours are true that Tom Derickx will retire to pursue a full time modelling career unless he's offered a big contract extension, then we could be in the running.

      Our 2 Toms are superstars, no doubt, but perhaps a bit too greedy.

      2 Toms.jpg

      Comment

      • Nico
        Veterans List
        • Jan 2003
        • 11328

        Big Tom and little Tom. Big Tom gets the girls, little Tom gets the Laurie Nash. Who is better off?
        http://www.nostalgiamusic.co.uk/secu...res/srh806.jpg

        Comment

        • Levii3
          Regular in the Side
          • Jun 2015
          • 655

          Let him go and get a good pick and sign Nat Fyfe as a free agent should have enough space if Tom leaves Teddy McGlynn retire end of this year McVeigh retires next year and Sam Reid trade?

          Comment

          • graemed
            Swans2win
            • Jan 2003
            • 410

            Originally posted by Levii3
            Let him go and get a good pick and sign Nat Fyfe as a free agent should have enough space if Tom leaves Teddy McGlynn retire end of this year McVeigh retires next year and Sam Reid trade?
            Under no circumstances should we sign Nat Fyfe.
            This is not to say he wouldn't be a great Swans player, on the contrary, he has been too good for us on many occasions in the past but consider what he may cost us.
            Its not just that we have to make room for him in the salary cap now, how can we re-sign players like Kennedy, Parker, Hannebery, Rampe, Heeney, Mills, etc. when their time comes.
            Lets not get ahead of ourselves, we have a great list with astounding room for improvement but it has been a trademark of this great club that players love playing for us. I was worried when we enlisted Tippett and felt worse when we went with Franklin. Thankfully both of those have proven their worth but again at some cost to the development of Sam Reid.
            I believe that if we go after Fyfe, we risk losing more than we would gain.

            Comment

            • Ludwig
              Veterans List
              • Apr 2007
              • 9359

              As an interesting exercise, imagine you're the Swans list manager and suppose Tom Mitchell was playing for Hawthorn this year but wanted to change clubs.

              Would you be interested in getting him?

              How much would you give up for him in players and picks?

              What kind of contract would you offer him?

              Comment

              • stellation
                scott names the planets
                • Sep 2003
                • 9718

                Giants look to have dropped Nathan Wilson this week- unless there's some unexpected oddity there, I'd be perfectly happy if we could somehow swing him over to Sydney as part of a Mitchell exit.
                I knew him as a gentle young man, I cannot say for sure the reasons for his decline
                We watched him fade before our very eyes, and years before his time

                Comment

                • azzzr
                  Pushing for Selection
                  • Jun 2016
                  • 52

                  Originally posted by Ludwig
                  What kind of contract would you offer him?
                  It's interesting listening to the radio this afternoon in Melbourne on 1116 SEN, and this question came up and they quoted 500k a year would get it done. but a lot of people on here - myself included believed his contract his on now would be equal too or near enough to that. So i am beginning to think there was a falling out between horse and him more so then money

                  - - - Updated - - -

                  Originally posted by stellation
                  Giants look to have dropped Nathan Wilson this week- unless there's some unexpected oddity there, I'd be perfectly happy if we could somehow swing him over to Sydney as part of a Mitchell exit.
                  Agreed I love watching him play, would love to see him in the red and white

                  Comment

                  • Steve
                    Regular in the Side
                    • Jan 2003
                    • 676

                    By 2018 Heeney will be the new Fyfe anyway (barring injury) - probably a superior version who is a better kick.

                    The figures that are bandied around in the media or fan forums are usually higher than what it actually the case - Mitchell probably got $350K last time, which was still a lot for an injured reserves player at the time.

                    Comment

                    • Levii3
                      Regular in the Side
                      • Jun 2015
                      • 655

                      Originally posted by Steve
                      By 2018 Heeney will be the new Fyfe anyway (barring injury) - probably a superior version who is a better kick.
                      If Mills can build his body up over the next two years than I think he will be a better Midfielder than Heeney he has slightly better vision and kicking ability

                      I hope Issac plays more midfield next year seriously hope he doesn't become the next Chad Wingard

                      Comment

                      • KTigers
                        Senior Player
                        • Apr 2012
                        • 2499

                        I reckon Fyfe has Sydney (the city) written all over him. But more likely to end up at GWS than with us... I guess we'll see.

                        Originally posted by Levii3
                        Let him go and get a good pick and sign Nat Fyfe as a free agent should have enough space if Tom leaves Teddy McGlynn retire end of this year McVeigh retires next year and Sam Reid trade?

                        Comment

                        • Reggi
                          On the Rookie List
                          • Jan 2003
                          • 2718

                          Barry has resigned from the Swans. Would suggest Tom is definately gone
                          You don't ban those who supported your opponent, you make them wallow in their loserdom by covering your victory! You sit them in the front row. You give them a hat! Toby Ziegler

                          Comment

                          • 56-14
                            Warming the Bench
                            • Dec 2015
                            • 260

                            Originally posted by Levii3
                            If Mills can build his body up over the next two years than I think he will be a better Midfielder than Heeney he has slightly better vision and kicking ability

                            I hope Issac plays more midfield next year seriously hope he doesn't become the next Chad Wingard
                            Heeney will obviously have big days, & as a result, the opposition will put resources into stopping him. He will therefore still be an asset on any so-called "off days".
                            I think Mills will end up in the Fyfe class - it won't matter what the opposition does - they will just have to hope for the best.
                            Together, both are going to be huge for our future success.

                            Comment

                            • Steve
                              Regular in the Side
                              • Jan 2003
                              • 676

                              Originally posted by Levii3
                              If Mills can build his body up over the next two years than I think he will be a better Midfielder than Heeney he has slightly better vision and kicking ability
                              The beauty is we have both, but if we could only have one, I'd take Heeney. Like Fyfe he will be a powerful midfielder who is so good overhead he could dominate up forward as well.

                              Mills should also be an elite midfielder, but more in the standard mold - but I think Heeney will go a level above given he adds another dimension, as Fyfe does (when injury free).

                              Comment

                              • Nico
                                Veterans List
                                • Jan 2003
                                • 11328

                                Originally posted by Reggi
                                Barry has resigned from the Swans. Would suggest Tom is definately gone
                                Well there you go. History repeating itself. Carlton here I come.
                                http://www.nostalgiamusic.co.uk/secu...res/srh806.jpg

                                Comment

                                Working...