Teams V Pies

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • UglyDuckling
    On the Rookie List
    • Aug 2008
    • 452

    Teams V Pies

    Its a real tough one for selectors this week

    Will Bradshaw be fit?

    Who will shaw replace?

    Does Jetta come back after a rest?

    Will vez hold his spot?

    To refrersh our memories from two weeks ago

    B: Bevan, Roberts-Thomson, Smith
    HB: Mattner, Grundy, Kennelly
    C: Malceski, Kirk, Rohan
    HF: O?Keefe, Goodes, Kennedy
    F: Hannebery, White, Jack
    FOLL: Mumford, J.Bolton, McVeigh
    Interchange:Vezpremi, Bird, McGlynn, Pyke

    Changes
    In: Shaw, Bradshaw

    Out: Beavan, ?????????

    Its too hard to pick a 22 already not wanting to leave rohan, vez, jetta or smith out imagine how hard it will be when seabs and bolts are back
  • Donners
    On the Rookie List
    • Jan 2003
    • 1061

    #2
    White would be the other obvious candidate to be dropped, particularly with Bradshaw coming in.

    Comment

    • Go Swannies
      Veterans List
      • Sep 2003
      • 5697

      #3
      Cute banner on the Swans' site. Shaw in red and white, Jolly in B&W

      Comment

      • Swanner
        On the Rookie List
        • Mar 2006
        • 186

        #4
        B - Mattner, LRT, Malceski
        HB - Kennelly, Grundy, Shaw
        C - McVeigh, Bolton, Hannebury
        HF - McGlynn, Goodes, O'Keefe
        F - Rohan, Bradshaw, White

        Ruck - Mumford, Jack, Kirk

        I/C - Pyke, Jetta, Smith, Bird

        The bench is a bit small but my memory of Collingwood is they are not the biggest team running around. We can always swap White for a small foward and send him back or move Pyke back and put White into the ruck. Really we are so close to our best 22 there are no excuses. Obviously Seaby in for Pyke and C. Bolton probably ultimately pushes a small out, probably Smith or Jetta. Both unlucky and still no room for Bevan, Richards, Vez, LJ or Barlow. This really is the nucleus of a Premiership team - just need an extra bit of class up through the middle, which could come through Rohan, Jetta, Hannebury holding their form at the top of the game rather than in fits and spurts as is the case with most young players.
        Last edited by Swanner; 23 June 2010, 12:22 PM.

        Comment

        • Peace
          On the Rookie List
          • Mar 2010
          • 598

          #5
          I can see 2 out of the following 4 people being rested.

          White (has been rubbish and braddy is coming back in, mcglynn will be staying put too)
          Rohan (didnt get a whole lot of the ball last week)
          Bevan (well, someone has to come out for shaw)
          Vezpremi (got more of the ball than rohan but lacked in his defensive side)

          Peace

          Comment

          • msb
            On the Rookie List
            • Mar 2006
            • 827

            #6
            Whatever team is put on the park (and with bradshaw in of course), this is our best chance of beating them in the last 5 years IMHO, especially if maxwell is out for them.

            Comment

            • aardvark
              Veterans List
              • Mar 2010
              • 5685

              #7
              Originally posted by Donners
              White would be the other obvious candidate to be dropped, particularly with Bradshaw coming in.
              Careful.....better put your flame suit on sayin things like that......

              Comment

              • Go Swannies
                Veterans List
                • Sep 2003
                • 5697

                #8
                Originally posted by aardvark
                Careful.....better put your flame suit on sayin things like that......
                Why? Because someone might point out the obvious - that Braddy won't be around in three years from now and if we want to win games it'd be handy to have a tall forward.

                I wonder if West Coast regret resting the young Cox when he was crap (or Nick Nat after the past few weeks)?

                But you may feel there's no point playing a kid running hot and cold merely because he's a vital part of our best forward configuration, one that worked very well earlier this season but fell apart when our full forward was injured?

                Comment

                • aardvark
                  Veterans List
                  • Mar 2010
                  • 5685

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Go Swannies
                  Why? Because someone might point out the obvious - that Braddy won't be around in three years from now and if we want to win games it'd be handy to have a tall forward.

                  I wonder if West Coast regret resting the young Cox when he was crap (or Nick Nat after the past few weeks)?

                  But you may feel there's no point playing a kid running hot and cold merely because he's a vital part of our best forward configuration, one that worked very well earlier this season but fell apart when our full forward was injured?
                  See....told you so....Oh and when did he actually run hot this year?
                  Last edited by aardvark; 23 June 2010, 03:32 PM.

                  Comment

                  • Go Swannies
                    Veterans List
                    • Sep 2003
                    • 5697

                    #10
                    Originally posted by aardvark
                    See....told you so....
                    I didn't want to disappoint.

                    Comment

                    • aardvark
                      Veterans List
                      • Mar 2010
                      • 5685

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Go Swannies
                      I didn't want to disappoint.
                      LOL.... i wasn't going to get sucked in to White discussions again but you got me ....well done.

                      Comment

                      • ernie koala
                        Senior Player
                        • May 2007
                        • 3251

                        #12
                        With Maxwell unlikely to play, and Bradshaw back in, it's a good opportunity for White to find some form against a lesser opponent, and it will stretch the Wobbles for height down back.
                        I'm guessing ...IN: Bradshaw, Shaw OUT: Bevan, Vespa
                        Last edited by ernie koala; 23 June 2010, 03:40 PM.
                        Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it's time to pause and reflect... MT

                        Comment

                        • UglyDuckling
                          On the Rookie List
                          • Aug 2008
                          • 452

                          #13
                          Originally posted by aardvark
                          See....told you so....Oh and when did he actually run hot this year?
                          Round 10 and 11 he kicked 3 goals a piece, stepping up for us with Bradshaw out injured

                          Comment

                          • Peace
                            On the Rookie List
                            • Mar 2010
                            • 598

                            #14
                            i'd call that luke warm compared to his form at the end of last year....

                            Comment

                            • aardvark
                              Veterans List
                              • Mar 2010
                              • 5685

                              #15
                              Originally posted by UglyDuckling
                              Round 10 and 11 he kicked 3 goals a piece, stepping up for us with Bradshaw out injured
                              Nooooo... i'm not biting

                              Comment

                              Working...