Round 18: Geelong pre-game discussion (With Teams)

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Damien
    Living in 2005
    • Jan 2003
    • 3713

    I have to admit I am torn on the selection, there is a part of me that is very angry that Roos hasn't made 2 or 3 changes to send a message, but on the other hand, a backs to the wall "got to save my career" type of attitude could be our only hope this week. Never know with Footy, Port last week had no chance in the Showdown but they played hard and got a bit luck with the Crows accuracy, if these 22 go in with every ounce of toughness they can throw at them, who knows. Ah, I live in hope.

    Comment

    • mcs
      Travelling Swannie!!
      • Jul 2007
      • 8149

      Originally posted by ugg
      (W/L Records since 2005 Round 1)
      Field Umpires:


      2. Michael VOZZO (11W 12L 47.8%)
      7. Hayden KENNEDY (9W 6L 60.0%)
      23. Robert FINDLAY (1W 4L 20.0%)

      We had Findlay last week, and I thought he was the worse of the lot.
      DOn't mind Kennedy or Vozzo generally, but Findlay is a crap umprie week in week out. He is an upcoming Steve Mclaren- his decisions are not only wrong a large percentage of the time, but he is very inconsistent as well.

      As for the selection, I'm not really suprised. The boys know they have to turn up and give a good account. I just want them to go out, have a real dig and put in a big effort. Do that and you never know what might happen- as Damien said look at Port last week.
      "You get the feeling that like Monty Python's Black Knight, the Swans would regard amputation as merely a flesh wound."

      Comment

      • Melbourne_Blood
        Senior Player
        • May 2010
        • 3312

        Small forward line has to be the go, Goodes is too valuable in the middle and should spend most of his time there. No point having him up forward if nobody can get the ball up there. Shaw looked good forward and I'd put him back there as i don't think he has an impact in defense. Moore and McGlynn are the other two obvious ones but I'd like to see Jetta up there, despite his yips, the cats can be exposed by speedy small forwards ( or at least they have been on one occasion this year, Carlton). Jack's goal smarts are good and I'd have him resting up there if he's not on Ablett. White has to play his arse off. That doesn't mean he has to kick a bag, i dont care if he doesn't kick a single goal, but he must present hard to every contest and either mark or create oppurtunities for the smalls. A bit of defensive pressure would be nice too. Teddy could be handy in the lead up role he performed a couple of weeks ago, but i wouldn't bank on it. All in all I'm not going in with any confidence whatsoever. I'd like to think a miracle could happen, but were kidding ourselves if we think we have a realistic chance of even getting within 5 goals of this geelong side ( even with thier outs). If i am proven wrong I'll happily eat humble pie, but i can't see it happening. Call me a pessimist but last week was one of the most disgraceful displays I've ever seen and no team that can be that bad could be good enough to beat a powerhouse like Geelong a week later.

        Comment

        • annew
          Senior Player
          • Mar 2006
          • 2164

          Not for a long time have I thought that the Swans do not have a chance - this week they do not have a chance - we may need the mercy rule at half time

          Comment

          • Bloody Hell
            Senior Player
            • Oct 2006
            • 3085

            Originally Posted by ugg
            Geelong
            In: Hawkins, Byrnes, West
            Out: Podsiadly (sore), Bartel (ankle), Blake

            Originally posted by laughingnome
            I smell resting.
            Yep.

            Might've well put -

            Out: Podsiadly (didn't feel like it), Bartel (sleeping in), Blake (no reason...what more do you want?)
            The eternal connundrum "what happens when an unstoppable force meets an immovable object" was finally solved when David Hasselhoff punched himself in the face.

            Comment

            • Bloody Hell
              Senior Player
              • Oct 2006
              • 3085

              Originally posted by Triple B
              Surely the first time in history a side can be unchanged after losing by 73 points.

              I'm not sure what changes should have been made, but I have to say I'm flabbergasted.
              I'll add a gobsmacked to your flabbergasted.
              The eternal connundrum "what happens when an unstoppable force meets an immovable object" was finally solved when David Hasselhoff punched himself in the face.

              Comment

              • stellation
                scott names the planets
                • Sep 2003
                • 9718

                It's nice to have a stable line up this late in the season, a sign you're doing well!
                I knew him as a gentle young man, I cannot say for sure the reasons for his decline
                We watched him fade before our very eyes, and years before his time

                Comment

                • Bloody Hell
                  Senior Player
                  • Oct 2006
                  • 3085

                  Originally posted by Bas
                  Based on the theory that lightening doesn't hit twice in the same spot.
                  Maybe Roos was disappointed with coming so close to gaining another record before his tenure ran out, he feels that this is the team to get him the record this week.

                  I'm all for being optimistic, but the first 10 minutes of this game will make or break the Swans. If the Cats can kick 2-3 unanswered goals, it's time to break out the methylated spirits and find a park bench somewhere.
                  The eternal connundrum "what happens when an unstoppable force meets an immovable object" was finally solved when David Hasselhoff punched himself in the face.

                  Comment

                  • BigD
                    Swans Tragic No. 1
                    • Apr 2007
                    • 394

                    I have to say I'm amazed that no changes were made.
                    Red & White forever.

                    Comment

                    • liz
                      Veteran
                      Site Admin
                      • Jan 2003
                      • 16744

                      Originally posted by BigD
                      I have to say I'm amazed that no changes were made.
                      Lots of people have made similar comments but I don't think I have read anyone who has actually nominated what changes they would have made.

                      Who would you bring in for whom and why?

                      Comment

                      • UglyDuckling
                        On the Rookie List
                        • Aug 2008
                        • 452

                        Originally posted by liz
                        Lots of people have made similar comments but I don't think I have read anyone who has actually nominated what changes they would have made.

                        Who would you bring in for whom and why?
                        i would agree with you.
                        had the reserves played last week and TDL, Vez, Reid etc dominated there would be a case to argue but as they had a week off and there isnt anyone coming back from injury it is hard to pick someone to come in.

                        My only change would be reid in because our backline is too small but as the pod isnt playing we can get by with only 2 tall defenders.

                        Comment

                        • Nich
                          Senior Player
                          • May 2010
                          • 1291

                          Originally posted by Bloody Hell
                          If the Cats can kick 2-3 unanswered goals, it's time to break out the methylated spirits and find a park bench somewhere.

                          I might be down for that.

                          Comment

                          • Bas
                            Veterans List
                            • Jan 2003
                            • 4457

                            Originally posted by Nich
                            I might be down for that.
                            Being very hard on yourself, I'd say 8 to 9 goals would warrant it.
                            In memory of my little Staffy - Dicey, 17.06.2005 to 1.12.2011- I'll miss you mate.

                            Comment

                            • Damien
                              Living in 2005
                              • Jan 2003
                              • 3713

                              Originally posted by liz
                              Lots of people have made similar comments but I don't think I have read anyone who has actually nominated what changes they would have made.

                              Who would you bring in for whom and why?
                              If we lose in the same way again this weekend (no heart), I am not sure it is going to matter 'who and why'. Sometimes the next in line just has to come in and shake things up. Thecurrent 22 should consider themselves very lucky that our depth seems so weak that a 73 point thrashing equals no changes.

                              Comment

                              • Go Swannies
                                Veterans List
                                • Sep 2003
                                • 5697

                                Originally posted by Damien
                                If we lose in the same way again this weekend (no heart), I am not sure it is going to matter 'who and why'. Sometimes the next in line just has to come in and shake things up. Thecurrent 22 should consider themselves very lucky that our depth seems so weak that a 73 point thrashing equals no changes.
                                On last week's performance there are 15 players that should be out. Can you list even four players that should come in to give us a better chance against the Cats?

                                Comment

                                Working...