A pick that late in the draft is a low percentage chance of success, and I say that after looking at the statistics. If the coaching staff felt we needed more back up for KP backs then that's why they have gone that way although the length of time taken to make the selection means it was debated amongst the group.
I for one hope that the Sydney change can work for Spangher, he was a reasonably high draft pick at 34 in the 2005 draft so looked to have ability at draft time. His first two years at the Weagles were ruined by injury so hopefully he can get fully fit this year and pose us selection headaches.
What we do in the rookie draft will be interesting as we have seven vacancies that we could fill. GWS have the first eight picks so our picks are 21, 38, 55. Still quite a number of rated juniors that weren't taken in the ND but they should all be gone by our first pick. Maybe we may pre list some NSW talent?
I for one hope that the Sydney change can work for Spangher, he was a reasonably high draft pick at 34 in the 2005 draft so looked to have ability at draft time. His first two years at the Weagles were ruined by injury so hopefully he can get fully fit this year and pose us selection headaches.
What we do in the rookie draft will be interesting as we have seven vacancies that we could fill. GWS have the first eight picks so our picks are 21, 38, 55. Still quite a number of rated juniors that weren't taken in the ND but they should all be gone by our first pick. Maybe we may pre list some NSW talent?


Comment