Teddy gets offerred a week for rough conduct - CLEARED

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • sfan
    Warming the Bench
    • May 2003
    • 487

    Teddy gets offerred a week for rough conduct - CLEARED

    Did not look that bad. He was stationery I thought at the time.
  • Quiet_Observer
    On the Rookie List
    • Mar 2004
    • 54

    #2
    Swans defender Ted Richards was also charged with rough conduct in a second-quarter incident with Bulldog Lindsay Gilbee.

    Richards' contact with Gilbee was assessed as negligent, medium impact and high contact, earning him 225 demerit points and a two-match suspension. Richards' five-year good record brought his penalty down to 168.75 points and a one-game ban.


    Trengove offered two weeks - AFL.com.au

    Comment

    • satchmopugdog
      Bandicoots ears
      • Apr 2004
      • 3691

      #3
      That well known ruffian Ted Richards cannot keep himself away from the tribunal...codswallop
      "The Dog days are over, The Dog days are gone" Florence and the Machine

      Comment

      • Big Al
        Veterans List
        • Feb 2005
        • 7007

        #4
        You would think with 1.2 billion in the kitty that the AFL could afford to hire intelligent football people instead of these mental midgets who clearly have NFI.
        ..And the Swans are the Premiers...The Ultimate Team...The Ultimate Warriors. They have overcome the highly fancied Hawks in brilliant style. Sydney the 2012 Premiers - Gerard Whately ABC

        Here it is Again! - Huddo SEN

        Comment

        • Peace
          On the Rookie List
          • Mar 2010
          • 598

          #5
          he was slowing down and protecting himself! didn't see anything malice in his body language... he should fight it.

          Comment

          • lwoggardner
            Warming the Bench
            • Aug 2005
            • 141

            #6
            Opens a spot for LRT?

            Comment

            • Matt79
              Bring it on!
              • Sep 2004
              • 3143

              #7
              What a JOKE!! Negligent my proverbial.

              All the MRP had to do was listen to the commentary of the game..." (Insert Bulldog Player here) fell into Teddy who actually looked like he had stopped to avoid contact" . Something along those lines. He will appeal and should get off.
              Swannies for life!

              Comment

              • Scottee
                Senior Player
                • Aug 2003
                • 1585

                #8
                He was stationary trying to avoid the contact FFS. What a crock of @@@@@. Fight it all the way my good man.
                We have them where we want them, everything is going according to plan!

                Comment

                • nomae
                  Regular in the Side
                  • May 2006
                  • 523

                  #9
                  We got Barry off in 2005. This should be a piece of cake.

                  Comment

                  • Jeffers1984
                    Veterans List
                    • Jan 2003
                    • 4564

                    #10
                    hahaha what a joke.
                    Official Driver Of The "Who Gives A @@@@ As The Player Will Get Delisted Anyway" Bandwagon.

                    Comment

                    • ShockOfHair
                      One Man Out
                      • Dec 2007
                      • 3668

                      #11
                      You could see he stopped so that he wouldn't make high contact. Certainly wasn't negligent.
                      The man who laughs has not yet heard the terrible news

                      Comment

                      • Scottee
                        Senior Player
                        • Aug 2003
                        • 1585

                        #12
                        "Ted Richards, Sydney Swans, has been charged with a Level Two engaging in rough conduct offence against Lindsay Gilbee, Western Bulldogs, during the second quarter of the Round Seven match between the Sydney Swans and the Western Bulldogs, played at Manuka Oval on Saturday May 7, 2011.

                        In summary, due to a five-year good record, he can accept a one-match sanction with an early plea.

                        Based on the video evidence available and a medical report from the Western Bulldogs, the incident was assessed as negligent conduct (one point), medium impact (two points) and high contact (two points). This is a total of five activation points, resulting in a classification of a Level Two offence, drawing 225 demerit points and a two-match sanction. He has an existing five-year good record, reducing the penalty by 25 per cent to 168.75 points and a one-match sanction. An early plea reduces the sanction by 25 per cent to 126.56 points and a one-match sanction."


                        Full report. Great example of a bunch of idle bureacrats looking to boost their own self importance. No "normal" follower of the game would think he did anything wrong.
                        We have them where we want them, everything is going according to plan!

                        Comment

                        • laughingnome
                          Amateur Statsman
                          • Jul 2006
                          • 1624

                          #13
                          This a week after Geischen said players that hit a stationary opponent with their head will not be given a free kick. MRP have NFI.

                          Teddy to get off tomorrow night. Officials can't get away with stooging us two weeks in a row.
                          10100111001 ;-)

                          Comment

                          • Untamed Snark
                            Senior Player
                            • Feb 2011
                            • 1375

                            #14
                            Seriously?
                            Really bad call from the officials.
                            I would love to agree with Laughingnome but sadly too cynical and knowing how much we need Teddy on our defence I think the panel are going to make the wrong decision should he challenge. That said Ted should challenge, it was clearly an attempt to avoid contact
                            Chillin' with the strange Quarks

                            Comment

                            • swansrule100
                              The quarterback
                              • May 2004
                              • 4538

                              #15
                              didnt know u got suspended for standing still and someone running into you
                              Theres not much left to say

                              Comment

                              Working...