Teddy gets offerred a week for rough conduct - CLEARED

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Untamed Snark
    Senior Player
    • Feb 2011
    • 1375

    #16
    If you play for Sydney you can...
    Chillin' with the strange Quarks

    Comment

    • GongSwan
      Senior Player
      • Jan 2009
      • 1362

      #17
      geez, how many players are we up against, teddy, the complete uncontrollable lunatic?????? What BS, just another example of anti Sydney bias on the part of the AFL, it's like a virus, our blokes don't stand much of a chance
      You can't argue with a sick mind - Joe Walsh

      Comment

      • ScottH
        It's Goodes to cheer!!
        • Sep 2003
        • 23665

        #18
        Like the player (For PA, I think) said the other week, when he got pinged by the umpire, "we're not playing Netball"

        Comment

        • giant
          Veterans List
          • Mar 2005
          • 4731

          #19
          Originally posted by sfan
          Did not look that bad. He was stationery I thought at the time.
          Maybe they thought that excuse was paper thin. Tish boom.

          Will miss him - I know they're not travelling so well, but on paper at least (there I go again!), a forward line of Westhoff, Motlop, Gray and Ebert ain't the worst going round.

          Comment

          • Triple B
            Formerly 'BBB'
            • Feb 2003
            • 6999

            #20
            There was a tackle on Sat night (Suns v Brians) that was 100% worse than Mummy's on Ablett last year. Didn't even get a mention that I can see.

            The inconsistency is mind-boggling...
            Driver of the Dan Hannebery bandwagon....all aboard. 4th April 09

            Comment

            • liz
              Veteran
              Site Admin
              • Jan 2003
              • 16761

              #21
              Originally posted by giant
              Maybe they thought that excuse was paper thin. Tish boom.

              Will miss him - I know they're not travelling so well, but on paper at least (there I go again!), a forward line of Westhoff, Motlop, Gray and Ebert ain't the worst going round.
              Motlop sounds like he will miss with injury and he's not a player you'd play Ted on anyway. Nor is Gray. If they both do play you'd think Rhyce and Smithy would get those jobs. Westhoff is very hot and cold but when he's on he is dangerous. I suspect Reg would be first choice to play on him but if they are worried by Westhoff's height, the obvious solution is to bring LRT back a week earlier than they otherwise might. Reg, if not on Westhoff, can take Ebert, and we still have Marty and Johnson plus Johnston waiting in the wings if needs be.

              Still, would much rather have Ted out there. He's been our rock this year.

              Comment

              • Big Al
                Veterans List
                • Feb 2005
                • 7007

                #22
                I say we get back to the old way where if the incident isn't picked up by the 3 Umpires, 4 boundaries and 2 goal umpires then it's play on.
                ..And the Swans are the Premiers...The Ultimate Team...The Ultimate Warriors. They have overcome the highly fancied Hawks in brilliant style. Sydney the 2012 Premiers - Gerard Whately ABC

                Here it is Again! - Huddo SEN

                Comment

                • liz
                  Veteran
                  Site Admin
                  • Jan 2003
                  • 16761

                  #23
                  Originally posted by Triple B
                  There was a tackle on Sat night (Suns v Brians) that was 100% worse than Mummy's on Ablett last year. Didn't even get a mention that I can see.

                  The inconsistency is mind-boggling...
                  And yet Jack Trengove has been outed for such a tackle on Dangerfield.

                  Comment

                  • Big Al
                    Veterans List
                    • Feb 2005
                    • 7007

                    #24
                    Originally posted by giant
                    Maybe they thought that excuse was paper thin. Tish boom.

                    Will miss him - I know they're not travelling so well, but on paper at least (there I go again!), a forward line of Westhoff, Motlop, Gray and Ebert ain't the worst going round.
                    The Tribunal will chuck this decision in the bin where it belongs.
                    ..And the Swans are the Premiers...The Ultimate Team...The Ultimate Warriors. They have overcome the highly fancied Hawks in brilliant style. Sydney the 2012 Premiers - Gerard Whately ABC

                    Here it is Again! - Huddo SEN

                    Comment

                    • giant
                      Veterans List
                      • Mar 2005
                      • 4731

                      #25
                      Originally posted by liz
                      Motlop sounds like he will miss with injury and he's not a player you'd play Ted on anyway. Nor is Gray. If they both do play you'd think Rhyce and Smithy would get those jobs. Westhoff is very hot and cold but when he's on he is dangerous. I suspect Reg would be first choice to play on him but if they are worried by Westhoff's height, the obvious solution is to bring LRT back a week earlier than they otherwise might. Reg, if not on Westhoff, can take Ebert, and we still have Marty and Johnson plus Johnston waiting in the wings if needs be.

                      Still, would much rather have Ted out there. He's been our rock this year.
                      Well I doubt he would have been dropped so he would have taken one of these I imagine (he had a "small" forward at some point last week didn't he?). My point was that despite struggling this year, on paper (oh stop it...), Port actually have a bit of offensive firepower.

                      Comment

                      • Lucky Knickers
                        Fandom of Fabulousness
                        • Oct 2003
                        • 4220

                        #26
                        Sorry WHAT?????
                        Could some tell me when exactly this happened. I've watched the replay and can't work it out. Tell me it's not that stupid push?

                        Comment

                        • Owen87
                          On the Rookie List
                          • Jun 2010
                          • 44

                          #27
                          I'm struggling to see the difference to Johncock's bump on Riewoldt a week earlier and Teddy's. Johncock got nothing an Riewoldt didn't come back on. Yet Gilbee plays on and Teddy gets a week the MRP is a joke

                          Comment

                          • ugg
                            Can you feel it?
                            Site Admin
                            • Jan 2003
                            • 15968

                            #28
                            Originally posted by Lucky Knickers
                            Sorry WHAT?????
                            Could some tell me when exactly this happened. I've watched the replay and can't work it out. Tell me it's not that stupid push?
                            There's a video of all MRP incidents on the front page of the afl.com.au
                            Reserves live updates (Twitter)
                            Reserves WIKI -
                            Top Goalkickers| Best Votegetters

                            Comment

                            • Lucky Knickers
                              Fandom of Fabulousness
                              • Oct 2003
                              • 4220

                              #29
                              Thanks Ugg. I don't remember that at all.

                              Comment

                              • Doctor
                                Bay 29
                                • Sep 2003
                                • 2757

                                #30
                                I remember the bump. The commentators at the time said there was nothing in it. My recollection is that it wasn't even deemed worthy of a free kick. To get a week for that would be an absolute joke. Not only was the contact unavoidable, but it makes the umpire look like a goose for not giving a free when he was, in fact, correct all along.

                                We'll probably accept the week but we should fight it. There was absolutely nothing wrong with what Richards did IMO.
                                Today's a draft of your epitaph

                                Comment

                                Working...