Changes for the Suns

[Melbourne_Blood]

Im with the 'spanky is not a cool nickname' camp. It sounds a little.. ..you know... ........ Anyways i dont think he needs one ( though i agree strut sounds cool). When you've got a name like Spangher, you dont need a nickname. Imagine he takes a screamer ? SPPAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANNNNNNNNNNNNNNGGGGGGGG GGGHHHHHHHHHHHHERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR!!!!!!! YOU LITTLE BEAUTYYYYYYYYYY!!!!!

Its ready made...and sounds better thank SPANKY, and i dont wanna see the way my mates will look at me if i start calling a player of ours "Spanky" ( i get enough @@@@ for being a swans supporter in Melbourne as it is )

[Untamed Snark]

Im with the 'spanky is not a cool nickname' camp. It sounds a little.. ..you know... ........ Anyways i dont think he needs one ( though i agree strut sounds cool). When you've got a name like Spangher, you dont need a nickname. Imagine he takes a screamer ? SPPAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANNNNNNNNNNNNNNGGGGGGGG GGGHHHHHHHHHHHHERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR!!!!!!! YOU LITTLE BEAUTYYYYYYYYYY!!!!!

Its ready made...and sounds better thank SPANKY, and i dont wanna see the way my mates will look at me if i start calling a player of ours "Spanky" ( i get enough @@@@ for being a swans supporter in Melbourne as it is )

Spanky does have great comic value though.

[ScottH]

I'm sure if he is a dud on Sat nite you'll be calling him something else along those lines.

[ernie koala]

Cool... I admire any poster that while criticizing the club provides solutions or alternatives.

I'm not sure whether your being sarcastic or not, but I pretty much always offer my suggestions when criticising.
So my team for GCS would be -

Backs : Smith - Grundy - Johnson
Half backs : Shaw - Richards - Malceski
Centre : Hannebery - Kennedy - Jack
Half forward : Okeefe - Reid - Johnston
Full forward : McVeigh - White - McGlynn
Followers : Seaby - Goodes , Bolton
I/C : Bird, Parker , Mummy : Sub - Mattner

White hasn't earnt his spot but should to be given a run , hopefully in dry conditions, at FF all day.

[Big Al]

I'm not sure whether your being sarcastic or not, but I pretty much always offer my suggestions when criticising.
So my team for GCS would be -

Backs : Smith - Grundy - Johnson
Half backs : Shaw - Richards - Malceski
Centre : Hannebery - Kennedy - Jack
Half forward : Okeefe - Reid - Johnston
Full forward : McVeigh - White - McGlynn
Followers : Seaby - Goodes , Bolton
I/C : Bird, Parker , Mummy : Sub - Mattner

White hasn't earnt his spot but should to be given a run , hopefully in dry conditions, at FF all day.

I was fair dinkum Ernie... Some posters just whinge without offering up solutions or alternatives. I like reading debate and not whinges. (even when I resort to whinging myself )

I don't mind LRT or Spangher helping Mummy in the Ruck and then being able to use them forward or back. Having said that I understand the case for Seaby's inclusion. I like LJ inclusion. We need someone in the sides whose field kicking is so superb. His best work last week was off the wing pushing forward. Long story short Ernie, I like the side.

[AnnieH]

Sorry guys, haven't read the preceeding 11 pages ... I don't normally make comments before a game, but the changes this week were just about exactly what we asked for.

Thanks for listening selectors!!

[ernie koala]

Sorry guys, haven't read the preceeding 11 pages ... I don't normally make comments before a game, but the changes this week were just about exactly what we asked for.

Thanks for listening selectors!!

Maybe what you asked for, but not me.

[Melbournehammer]

I'm not sure whether your being sarcastic or not, but I pretty much always offer my suggestions when criticising.
So my team for GCS would be -Backs : Smith - Grundy - Johnson
Half backs : Shaw - Richards - Malceski
Centre : Hannebery - Kennedy - Jack
Half forward : Okeefe - Reid - Johnston
Full forward : McVeigh - White - McGlynn
Followers : Seaby - Goodes , Bolton
I/C : Bird, Parker , Mummy : Sub - Mattner

White hasn't earnt his spot but should to be given a run , hopefully in dry conditions, at FF all day.

The two problems I'd have with this team is Parker for Mattner and the inclusion of two rucks. I wouldnt do it and I reckon Marty is playing as well as anyone at the moment. I might however play Parker for one of the rucks.

[Captain]

I'm not sure whether your being sarcastic or not, but I pretty much always offer my suggestions when criticising.
So my team for GCS would be -

Backs : Smith - Grundy - Johnson
Half backs : Shaw - Richards - Malceski
Centre : Hannebery - Kennedy - Jack
Half forward : Okeefe - Reid - Johnston
Full forward : McVeigh - White - McGlynn
Followers : Seaby - Goodes , Bolton
I/C : Bird, Parker , Mummy : Sub - Mattner

White hasn't earnt his spot but should to be given a run , hopefully in dry conditions, at FF all day.

No LRT. You must be kidding.

[AnnieH]

Maybe what you asked for, but not me.

Seemed to have worked.