Changes for the Suns
Collapse
X
-
-
Grundy said in an article earlier in the week that the problem with the forwards missing goals was the delivery service.
Well, I'm happy to announce the "SILVER FORWARD DELIVERY SERVICE". This week the ball will be delivered to the forwards on a silver platter with all appropriate garnishes included.
Not sure if it's the Easter Bunny or Santa carrying the platter's. Will get back to you when I know more.
Very hard on Seaby missing out but good to see that the "Spang has been Sprung!!!!!!"In memory of my little Staffy - Dicey, 17.06.2005 to 1.12.2011- I'll miss you mate.Comment
-
Tough luck for the him. Hopefully it's nothing serious...And the Swans are the Premiers...The Ultimate Team...The Ultimate Warriors. They have overcome the highly fancied Hawks in brilliant style. Sydney the 2012 Premiers - Gerard Whately ABC
Here it is Again! - Huddo SENComment
-
4 genuine FB's in the team (plus AJ as another tall defender) - I can't see the logic but we all must be missing something I guess.
I'm sure I'm in the minority but I agree with Melbourne_Blood - I think Jesse has been a bit hard done by. I undertsand some of the criticisms, but he needs to either be given an extended run at it, or just be done with it and leave him in the reserves. Our whole strategy last week was dumb - just as Adelaide did with Tippett, we should have left Jesse in the goal sqaure and gone long, he would generally at least create a crumb, but over the course of a game in wet conditions you'll also get a couple of clumsy spoils from defenders that result in frees and easy goals (again a la Tippett).
Gee TDL is unlucky - that's the problem leaving him in the reserves too long, he hurts his foot kicking too many goals.Last edited by Steve; 7 July 2011, 06:04 PM.Comment
-
I get swinging the axe and all that after a loss, but I don't really understand the logic of dropping Seaby and White. I could get dropping Seaby OR White, presumably White first, but dropping both seems odd. Seaby has generally been playing well and has earnt his spot, if they didn't want to go with two traditional ruckmen then I thought White was perfectly fine as a backup last week. It's not blind White obsession at all, when he's been dropped previously I've got it- this one just puzzles me a bit, particularly thinking that this would be a good chance to get him some confidence playing at home.I knew him as a gentle young man, I cannot say for sure the reasons for his decline
We watched him fade before our very eyes, and years before his timeComment
-
Umpires
2. Michael "Bozo" VOZZO (21 wins 21 losses 50.0%)
11. Matthew "Deaf" LEPPARD (0 Swans games)
24. Michael "State of Origin" JENNINGS (2 wins 1 loss 66.7%)
Emergency
27. Ben RYAN (1 win 100.0%)
This year
Jennings umpired the Essendon and Richmond wins and the Carlton Docklands loss
Ryan umpired the Port Adelaide win
Vozzo and Leppard haven't umpired us this year.Comment
-
Totally agree about Seaby Robbo. The best teams have all got 2 rucks, Seaby can kick goals if given a chance . His field kicking is better than Mummy's. Mummy will get tired. GC only have to wait until the second half of each quarter to put Ablett on with Smith and they will be away. We need Seaby, this is dumb, really dumb. We need to team to adapt to having two rucks. Surely this is the offer of a gift to GWS at trade time.We have them where we want them, everything is going according to plan!Comment
-
This is the other issue - when you play @@@@ teams, you get the @@@@ (or perhaps to be more accurate, @@@@-er) umpires.Comment
-
The dropping of White confuses me. They Bring him back against Collingwood, he doesnt do much. So we give him another week. Its in the wet ( didnt see the game, assuming he did @@@@ all), in a game where we kick 6 or so goals as a team, and he doesnt peform again.( In all this he is also playing probably a third of his game time if not more as a backup ruck). Now he gets dropped ? Whats the point of giving him a crack in the first place ?Comment
-
Well done selectors...they've managed to leave us top heavy with talls but only one ruckman.
And this against a team whose strengths are, clearances, speed and skill.
Why drop Parker, who played well last week.
I would of thought this would of been a perfect chance for him, and also Sumner, to show their wares against players their own age.
The team is already overflowing with defenders.
Why is Kennelly still in the team, he has been woeful the last 2 weeks.
Why drop Seaby, who is in good form. Surely once the decision was made to play one ruckman Seaby had to be it.
Mummy was very ordinary last start and could do with some form and fitness finding, in the 2's.
We'll probably win the game but the team on paper looks predictable and very defensive.......Against the Gold coast of all teams.Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it's time to pause and reflect... MTComment
Comment