Round 1- Vs GWS

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Auntie.Gerald
    Veterans List
    • Oct 2009
    • 6474

    #31
    to be fair i thought that GWS spread very very well in counter attack today but more impressive was they read the game in 5050s and spread on that too.

    ROK, Macca, Kennedy had a little bit of trouble going with them off the mark. This slight advantage of the younger fast GWS players lead to fairly even inside 50s at 3qtr time

    GWS will rise up nicely over the next two seasons

    prediction 5 wins in 2013

    prediction 7 wins at least in 2014

    if you are off your game they will hurt you

    re SWANNIES

    fairly scrappy - the Swans didnt adjust to the spread of GWS in the 3rd qtr nor in the first 15mins of the 2nd qtr

    I felt that the Swans really got the rub of the green on the ump calls - i felt the scully tackle on Bolton was harsh and changed the game

    never the less great effort to get the win and roll on from hear !
    "be tough, only when it gets tough"

    Comment

    • SCGonasunnyday
      Warming the Bench
      • Dec 2007
      • 323

      #32
      Couple of things:

      1. 17 contested marks - perhaps indicative of the number of bombs to packs in the game, but Mummy and Pyke were on fire. Also both stayed on the park over 90% of the game which is pretty amazing.

      2. Keiran Jack should be in for a big year.

      3. Jetta had more than a few cobwebs. To be honest it is pretty lucky scheduling for us to have (on paper) the easiest game first up.

      4. Crowd was probably 50:50 or slightly more swans but GWS fans were far louder. Reflects how hard it is for fans to get excited in winning game you are expected to win easily. Won't be long before the game is genuinely tight (or shudder GWS win one).

      Comment

      • DamY
        Senior Player
        • Sep 2011
        • 1479

        #33
        Round 1- Vs GWS

        From the swans GA area, it looked much more red and white, but was probably due to our location.
        Scrappy Swans, wasn't a joy to watch at all. Probably not much noise from Swans cos the win was expected. Arrogant I know, but after last years showing it is only to be expected. Surely we'll get louder once they win a few. Hard to get involved when there's hardly anyone around lol

        Comment

        • lwjoyner
          Regular in the Side
          • Nov 2004
          • 950

          #34
          Mees think that we get to a handy lead and take the foot of the pedal and start crusing. Disappointed in our kicking to position and goal particualrly close we msut have missed as many as we won by so I suppose that is a least a good sign.

          Comment

          • Xie Shan
            Senior Player
            • Jan 2003
            • 2929

            #35
            We weren't really able to play the same 'slingshot' style from last year, in part due to the Giants' pace, their kids are starting to read the game a lot better as already mentioned. That said this may not be an issue if Mumford and Pyke keep marking the ball in the forward line like they did yesterday!

            Comment

            • ShockOfHair
              One Man Out
              • Dec 2007
              • 3668

              #36
              Originally posted by Xie Shan
              We weren't really able to play the same 'slingshot' style from last year, in part due to the Giants' pace, their kids are starting to read the game a lot better as already mentioned. That said this may not be an issue if Mumford and Pyke keep marking the ball in the forward line like they did yesterday!
              Don't know if the Giants shut down Jetta or he just had a bad day. Just five touches. I guess other teams will make an effort to choke off the slingshot this year and try to create their own.

              I thought our first quarter was the best - there were the fewest turnovers and poor choices. In the second half we made a lot of mistakes from tiredness. Kicking efficiency was 61% which tells the story.

              Mummo looked trim and back in town after bad injury run last year. Kennedy got 24 contested possessions. Jack was hot. McGlynn was pretty sharp. Reid was good. So lots of good signs but we will need to play better against the Suns next week.
              The man who laughs has not yet heard the terrible news

              Comment

              • Nich
                Senior Player
                • May 2010
                • 1291

                #37
                It's like a thoroughbred going through the motions, getting fitter with each race until they are at peak fitness for when it counts.

                It may not look pretty at the moment but we are nowhere near our peak. Take the two and move on. I'm happy.

                Comment

                • Ruck'n'Roll
                  Ego alta, ergo ictus
                  • Nov 2003
                  • 3990

                  #38
                  Originally posted by Bexl
                  I think Bird will come into the team.
                  From what was observed by the ressie watchers, he is nowhere near ready.

                  Comment

                  • Beerman
                    Regular in the Side
                    • Oct 2010
                    • 823

                    #39
                    Round 1- Vs GWS

                    I'm out of town this weekend and wasn't that keen on going to the game anyway. Round 1 last year was hugely frustrating and I had the feeling this year would be much the same. I wasn't disappointed. Good run from the boys, comfortable win, take the points and look to improve next week. Nothing to get worried about, (remember how underdone ROK was in Rnd 1 last year? From that to a Norm Smith), but nothing too exciting either.

                    Also, Rampe did well, but someone needs to tell him not to overcommit to the tackle. A couple of times his man ran past him because he charged too quickly at them. The enthusiasm of youth!

                    Comment

                    • dimelb
                      pr. dim-melb; m not f
                      • Jun 2003
                      • 6889

                      #40
                      It reminded me (to swap seasons) of the struggle to start the lawnmower after a winter doing nothing: splutter, roar, splutter, stop, pull the cord again, splutter etc.
                      The effort was there but the skills were lamentable. We will do better. We need to.
                      Having said that, a significant part of our problem was the new level achieved by GWS. They are quick, keen, and have a few skilled characters of their own. They'll upset some sides this year.
                      He reminds him of the guys, close-set, slow, and never rattled, who were play-makers on the team. (John Updike, seeing Josh Kennedy in a crystal ball)

                      Comment

                      • DamY
                        Senior Player
                        • Sep 2011
                        • 1479

                        #41
                        This link suggests that the crowd was more us than GWS.

                        Comment

                        • Melbournehammer
                          Senior Player
                          • May 2007
                          • 1815

                          #42
                          Having woken up I decided to watch the game. I can't watch it. It is unwatchable. The skills in this game are beyond bad and we won it seems to me despite ourselves - there were parts of this game where we were simply unable to do anything except hack it off a step. But rather than that occurring once or twice it was like 7-8 times in a row. Thank god for the draw, otherwise we'd have been stuffed.

                          Thankfully I know there is a lot of improvement there but I hope I don't have to watch too many games like this - it reminds me of the kick and hope of the 70s

                          Comment

                          • Ruck'n'Roll
                            Ego alta, ergo ictus
                            • Nov 2003
                            • 3990

                            #43
                            Originally posted by DamY
                            This link suggests that the crowd was more us than GWS.
                            With apologies to the bard

                            Sheedy has come to Sydney,
                            To claim this city for the AFL,
                            The Swans were already hear,
                            Yet Sheedy is an honourable man!
                            11,000 giants signed already
                            The game expanding rapidly
                            Such surprising news proclained
                            Yet Sheedy is an honourable man!
                            Looking at a Giant home game
                            A sea of red is all I percieve
                            Something is seriously amiss
                            Yet Sheedy is an honourable man!
                            Could their membership count
                            Include infants, pets and ghosts
                            I really beging to wonder
                            Is Sheedy truly an honourable man?

                            Comment

                            • Nico
                              Veterans List
                              • Jan 2003
                              • 11337

                              #44
                              Sure we have a good draw in the first 2 rounds, but if it was 2 top teams we were playing the preseason would have been adjusted accordingly to achieve a much higher fitness level. By the way GC were pretty good so this week we will need to go up a few levels.
                              http://www.nostalgiamusic.co.uk/secu...res/srh806.jpg

                              Comment

                              • johnno
                                On the Rookie List
                                • Apr 2008
                                • 1102

                                #45
                                Did anyone else notice that Mumford had 2 frees against for simply being 'too strong' for his opponent?

                                Frustrated the hell out of me!!!!

                                Comment

                                Working...