-
-
"Port have had their chances-they led early'
No they led Briefly
GO SWANS!!!!!Chillin' with the strange QuarksComment
-
How many did Harry kick ?Before you criticize a man, walk a mile in his shoes. That way you'll be a mile away and he'll be shoeless.Comment
-
Jake Lloyd is something special.The eternal connundrum "what happens when an unstoppable force meets an immovable object" was finally solved when David Hasselhoff punched himself in the face.Comment
-
Ugh and which commentator said they would recommend Tippett rucked in finals?! IdiotComment
-
What a win ????.
I have not yelled at the tv like that in years!!!
Was Tippett limping after the game?
I have to try and calm down now.Comment
-
it was a clinical win tonight. We just did enough to win. I am getting a bit tired of this attitude. We need to finish off sides. We should have killed them in the third and again in the last. I wonder if Mal has already decided where he is going next year as his delivery at times is disgusting. I think his mistakes actually lost us the Hawks and I think he was on target to lose it in the third quarter the way he was delivering up field. Mind you he wasn't on his own. I think this is a second game Birdy should want to forget. His game was very ordinary tonight and his delivery to the forward line was crap. Same with Kizza & even though Mal played well his delivery to the forward line at times left a lot to be desired. I don't understand why players on their own can't hit up a player.Comment
-
Great win away against a quality outfit! Happy with the points considering our forward line never really fired all night! Smith back in and we'll be looking good!
Comment
-
The reputation of the Swans means teams ALWAYS get up to play them. I've seen some Port games recently, and that's the best I've seen them for some time. Probably should have won....but the good teams find a way, and if nothing else, the Swans are a good team.
I'd suggest Port have put in a big training block for finals, and being a young side it has impacted them mor than most. The Port - Freo game n round 23 will be a cracker.The eternal connundrum "what happens when an unstoppable force meets an immovable object" was finally solved when David Hasselhoff punched himself in the face.Comment
-
i dont think Port should have won tonight
we simply allowed them to move into areas on the field we wanted them to move into............this tends to look like they are dangerous with ball in hand but it was generally on our terms
equally when they turn it over in these areas we tended to find them out and move the ball very quickly to our advantage
i must say though the clearances and hit outs are now beyond a joke and a better team upfront like the Hawks would have destroyed us from the clearances by hitting targets"be tough, only when it gets tough"
Comment
-
Great win away from home and most importantly, it wasn't Buddy centric...very good signs for the finals with Rohan and Cunningham playing well. Rohan is reminding me a little of Maxfield with his run...
Jetta came good in the second half...I still think he's carrying an injury of some sort...many others may be too...
Anyway, I'm very happy with that win, it was a team win...
Oh the commentary was shocking...glad I don't pay for that rubbish..Comment
-
Great win by the boys tonight.
Umpires were very bad - we got a couple but Port were given dream run by the umpires.
I thought Shaw and Birdy had very ordinary games. Last week I thought Bird was one of our weakest players and tonight he didn't do anything to change my mind. Does Shaw have a pair of footy boots with stops in them as he continually fell over and his kicking was shocking. Benny was brilliant and I thought Gaz and Cunningham did well.
- - - Updated - - -
Oh and I just about put my foot throughout the TV at the commentary. Absolutely disgusting and so one eyed it wasn't funny. Fancy having 2 SA ex players commentating this game.Comment
-
Jake Lloyd is a beauty. He was cool and composed in the last quarter, and disposal silky. Decisive games by our most important players: McVeigh, Kennedy, Jetta, McGlynn, Parker. I thought Laidler was really good, too. Great to see Gary nail that goal - he fumbled a bit at first, but had an excellent second half.
- - - Updated - - -
I didn't think the commentary was bad at all. It's in Adelaide, with local commentators, you expect it to be focussed on the home team. They were sufficiently complimentary.Comment
-
I can see that.
Thought the umpires weren't nearly as bad as last week.
Few they missed - thought Pyke was stiff late in the last in a ruck contest when he was clearly held.
As for the commentary..... I get that it's a Port home game AND that they were the underdogs and that they needed to build up the game, but they were way over the top tonight. Like I said before, possible the worst bias I've heard...The difference between insanity and genius is measured only in success.Comment
- If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
- RWO Forum Rules (PLEASE READ FIRST)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Your posts may be deleted, without warning or notification at moderator discretion, for breach of any of the RWO rules set out below. If you have any questions or concerns about post/thread removal, please feel free to PM a moderator or Email us at [email protected]
Do not post your queries on the main boards. Such posts WILL be removed, without further explanation.
Constant breaches of the rules will result in your access to RWO being reduced as the Moderator / Administrator group see fit. RWO uses the vBulletin Infraction System to deal with breaches of the RWO rules. All Infractions have an expiry date. Such an expiry date may be as short as 10 days or as long as 6 months. Multiple infractions, depending on the number of points a member accumulates, WILL result in temporary bans from the site and CAN result in a permanent ban. Please note that some Infractions have an expiry date of "Never" and WILL result in the RWO member being banned from the site immediately.
1) Signatures / Avatars
Keep signatures under 4 lines of standard sized fonts (if you must use large fonts, use just one line) as a courtesy to all users who read the forums.
Do not use signatures / avatars as an opportunity to make jibes at other forum members. This will be considered to be sniping (refer Rule 6 below). You may not refer to another RWO forum member, or quote anything they have written, without permission from that member. Using an anonymous tag does not make it acceptable. If quotes are not removed, we reserve the right to remove them, without notification. If in doubt as to whether something is acceptable or not, don't use it!
2) Spamming
Advertising for personal commercial purposes is NOT permitted. Placing links to sites that other users may find of interest / personal websites is acceptable within reason (ie constantly posting links will be frowned upon).
3) Deliberately avoiding the RWO swear filter
RWO is a site that is accessible by Swans supporters of all ages and walks of life. A swear filter is in place to mask offensive words and phrases. This swear filter contains offensive words and variant spellings of offensive words to stop you from deliberately avoiding the swear filter. Do not attempt to avoid the swear filter through alternate spelling of offensive words. Do not attempt to avoid the swear filter by devising systems to fool the swear filter in its recognition of offensive words.
4) Inappropriate Language / Excessive swearing
RWO is a site that is accessible by Swans supporters of all ages and walks of life. Moderators will let some minor cases through. Anything deemed to be of poor taste or of an offensive nature may be removed at moderator discretion. Consider all members when posting; what you think is funny, not all members will feel the same way.
5) Trolling / Baiting
Deliberately posting on threads in an attempt to stir / bait other RWO users will not be tolerated.
6) Flaming / Sniping / Abuse / Insulting other members
If you have to have a go at someone personally, take it off the boards. Everyone else doesn't need to see your hissy fits. Remember, "Play the ball, not the man". This includes spouses or partners. If you don''t like a post, don't flame, snipe, abuse or insult in response - it makes the job of moderation much harder. Report the post through the forum reporting mechanism (click on the Triangle with the exclamation mark) and let the Moderator / Administrator group deal with it.
7) Legal issuesa) The Moderator / Administrator group will keep a very close eye on threads discussing rumours or anything that could be potentially libellous. Moderators and Administrators are not interested in the chance of legal action regardless of how small - if deemed that there is ANY threat to RWO potentially, we will come down hard on it.
b) Due to potential issues of copyright infringement and the potential legal implications, posting of complete articles is NOT permitted. If necessary, post a link to the article. Where appropriate, you may quote sections of the article to aid in discussion.
c) Due to potential issues of copyright infringement and potential legal implications, posting of links to "live streaming (of AFL games)" and "AFL content" sites that are not AFL endorsed is NOT permitted. Posts with such links will be removed immediately and infraction points will be issued.
d) Freedom of speech does NOT = freedom to slander
8) Racial / Sexual Discrimination / Villification
It is not acceptable for members to engage in racial and/or sexual discrimination / villification. It is not acceptable for members to use terminology in describing race or gender in a derogatory manner. Discussing and disputing the views and opinions of other posters is acceptable. Personally vilifying or abusing others for having certain characteristics, or being a member of a certain group (or because you think they're a member of a certain group), is not. This rule shall apply to any post attacking race, skin colour, ethnic background, gender and sexuality.
See also: ---> RACIAL DISCRIMINATION ACT 1975 - SECT 9
See also: ---> RACIAL DISCRIMINATION ACT 1975 - SECT 18C
9) Prohibited
Anything deemed to be of Adult content or porn related nature will be removed immediately. Selling or offering of drugs, drug references, other than those openly discussed and identified in the press, will also be removed immediately. Breaches of this rule carry the highest infraction points and may result in permanent bans on a first offence.
10) Off-topic Posts
Some members prefer to just read Swans or footy related posts. This is, after all, a SSFC website. Ensure you post threads in the appropriate forum, or they will be moved. While threads will sometimes move away from the original topic, do not deliberately drag a thread away from its original subject.
11) Attachments
Attachments within the size limit prescribed are permitted. However, due to costs associated with uploads/downloads, if you wish to attach a number of files within a thread, or feel that the quality of the attachment is compromised by the file size restrictions, you may wish to use external hosting providers and link to the files there.
12) Moderator / Administrator Group
The Moderator / Administrator group reserve the right to delete or move threads / posts as well as remove signatures / avatars as necessary according to the rules of the RWO forum.
13) Final decisions
Any decisions made around the intepretation of the rules above are entirely at the discretion of the site administrators. Such decisions are final.
14) Vistitors from other sites
You are most welcome to join in discussions on RWO, but remember, you are a GUEST on our site. Abide by the RWO Forum Rules or we WILL ban you.
15) Guidelines regarding Visitors to RWO for RWO members.
Be nice, not all visitors are trolls.a) If they annoy you, ignore them. They want a reaction. Don't give them one.
b) If they are abusive, report them. We will consider banning them. Don't stoop to their level.Bottom line
You are a guest on RWO - You are expected to play by the rules of the house.
Last Update: ScottH, June 22nd, 2008 (Included Spouses/partners in Rule 6)
Last Update: Frog, August 16th, 2010 (Added rule 7c)
Last update: ScottH July 17th, 2011 (Added Rule 7d)
Tweet
© RedAndWhiteOnline.com 2003-
Powered by vBulletin® Version 6.0.6
Copyright © 2025 MH Sub I, LLC dba vBulletin. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2025 MH Sub I, LLC dba vBulletin. All rights reserved.
All times are GMT+10. This page was generated at 09:42 PM.
Comment