List changes and trade bait

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • 0918330512
    Senior Player
    • Sep 2011
    • 1654

    Originally posted by Auntie.Gerald
    i dont agree this thread should be locked .......except a few posters trying to hi-jack it away from what it should be ie rumours on trades etc !!!!

    I dont think there is a fair and reasonable basis to do that......... but if the moderators of this public forum do think that it should be a lock, I would like to know the justification ???

    I think the fair and reasonable action by those not interested in trade talk and rumours is to not pop into this thread which is clearly marked on what subject it is.

    THE PLAYER MOVEMENT RUMOURS ARE RIFE !
    Then again, there are others who aren't fussed

    Fair point Auntie

    Comment

    • O'Reilly Boy
      Warming the Bench
      • Feb 2014
      • 474

      Originally posted by Auntie.Gerald

      I think the fair and reasonable action by those not interested in trade talk and rumours is to not pop into this thread which is clearly marked on what subject it is.

      THE PLAYER MOVEMENT RUMOURS ARE RIFE !

      hear hear. I am loving the speculation. Just like all the half-time conversations at the game.

      Comment

      • Go Swannies
        Veterans List
        • Sep 2003
        • 5697

        Then I wonder if we should not play Mal again - if it's likely he'll leave? Especially if he's talked to the Hawks and we play them in the GF?

        Maybe it'd be better to play Mitchell so we can get more for him as a trade?

        Comment

        • Auntie.Gerald
          Veterans List
          • Oct 2009
          • 6480



          thats better............

          Attached Files
          "be tough, only when it gets tough"

          Comment

          • Matt80
            Suspended by the MRP
            • Sep 2013
            • 1802

            Originally posted by Go Swannies
            Then I wonder if we should not play Mal again - if it's likely he'll leave? Especially if he's talked to the Hawks and we play them in the GF?

            Maybe it'd be better to play Mitchell so we can get more for him as a trade?
            think the Swans will take the flag that Malceski can help them win.

            If Malceski wins the Norm Smith, he will get more money and a longer contract from an opposition club. A bigger and longer contract will be better for the Swans Free Agency Compensation arrangement. It will also allow Malceski a better opportunity for his financial future.

            Malceski playing the next two games could be the biggest win /win scenario in 2014.

            Micthell?s trade value has been tickled upwards by his games against St Kilda and Richmond. He is young, so a couple more games won?t alter his trade value if a deal has to be done.

            Comment

            • ScottH
              It's Goodes to cheer!!
              • Sep 2003
              • 23665

              Originally posted by Auntie.Gerald
              i dont agree this thread should be locked .......except a few posters trying to hi-jack it away from what it should be ie rumours on trades etc !!!!

              I dont think there is a fair and reasonable basis to do that......... but if the moderators of this public forum do think that it should be a lock, I would like to know the justification ???

              I think the fair and reasonable action by those not interested in trade talk and rumours is to not pop into this thread which is clearly marked on what subject it is.

              THE PLAYER MOVEMENT RUMOURS ARE RIFE !
              Never said I would close it, although my comment could be interpreted that way.
              I meant for the posters to put it on ice until the end of OUR season.

              It seems to be gaining more momentum than our next game, but then that is 2 weeks away!!!!

              Comment

              • Go Swannies
                Veterans List
                • Sep 2003
                • 5697

                Originally posted by Matt80
                think the Swans will take the flag that Malceski can help them win.

                If Malceski wins the Norm Smith, he will get more money and a longer contract from an opposition club. A bigger and longer contract will be better for the Swans Free Agency Compensation arrangement. It will also allow Malceski a better opportunity for his financial future.

                Malceski playing the next two games could be the biggest win /win scenario in 2014.

                Micthell?s trade value has been tickled upwards by his games against St Kilda and Richmond. He is young, so a couple more games won?t alter his trade value if a deal has to be done.
                Mitchell would definitely have more value as a Premiership player than he'd have as a seniors bit player.

                And think what we could get for Luke Parker as a Premiership player. Parker and our R1 pick for Priddis?

                Comment

                • Ampersand
                  On the Rookie List
                  • Apr 2014
                  • 694

                  Mitchell is contracted to the end of 2016. Space is likely to open up in the midfield group next year with Goodes retiring (and he should absolutely retire in my opinion) which gives us the opportunity to rotate Parker, Jack or McGlynn as crumbing small forward options - one area which I think we need to develop.

                  If Malceski moves on then McVeigh moving to half back opens up even more positions in the midfield group.

                  For mine, a fit and healthy Tom Mitchell is a dead certainty for our best 22 next season.

                  Comment

                  • mcs
                    Travelling Swannie!!
                    • Jul 2007
                    • 8166

                    Originally posted by Go Swannies
                    Mitchell would definitely have more value as a Premiership player than he'd have as a seniors bit player.

                    And think what we could get for Luke Parker as a Premiership player. Parker and our R1 pick for Priddis?
                    You can't be serious about Parker Go Swannies! Plus he is already a Premiership player
                    "You get the feeling that like Monty Python's Black Knight, the Swans would regard amputation as merely a flesh wound."

                    Comment

                    • jono2707
                      Goes up to 11
                      • Oct 2007
                      • 3326

                      Originally posted by Matt80
                      Micthell?s trade value has been tickled upwards by his games against St Kilda and Richmond. He is young, so a couple more games won?t alter his trade value if a deal has to be done.
                      His value to us also increases with each game he plays.

                      No deal. There are a number of other players, both senior and fringe, the club would rather trade than Tom. He is our future.

                      And Matt80, save your lengthy response to this one thanks - we know your thoughts on this already.

                      Comment

                      • Go Swannies
                        Veterans List
                        • Sep 2003
                        • 5697

                        Originally posted by jono2707
                        His value to us also increases with each game he plays.

                        No deal. There are a number of other players, both senior and fringe, the club would rather trade than Tom. He is our future.

                        And Matt80, save your lengthy response to this one thanks - we know your thoughts on this already.
                        No we need more electric players.

                        So keep Towers and trade Mitchell for Poles (Podsiadly?) and wires (Stringer?).

                        Comment

                        • KTigers
                          Senior Player
                          • Apr 2012
                          • 2499

                          Trade Parker? This guy is 21 and the way he's going he will be a new Scott Pendlebury/Joel Selwood in a few years.
                          I'd be thinking about giving him a very long, very lucrative contact.
                          Mitchell has been a bit unlucky this year with injury, and it's very hard to get into a side like ours that basically wins every
                          week and already has an All Australian midfield. He is a keeper for sure.

                          Originally posted by Go Swannies
                          Mitchell would definitely have more value as a Premiership player than he'd have as a seniors bit player.

                          And think what we could get for Luke Parker as a Premiership player. Parker and our R1 pick for Priddis?

                          Comment

                          • ShockOfHair
                            One Man Out
                            • Dec 2007
                            • 3668

                            Whoa, finals delirium has taken hold. Mitchell (Tom) and Parker are not going anywhere, any time. You can build a premiership team around them and I'm sure we will.
                            The man who laughs has not yet heard the terrible news

                            Comment

                            • bloods1984
                              On the Rookie List
                              • Oct 2012
                              • 15

                              Originally posted by Go Swannies
                              Mitchell would definitely have more value as a Premiership player than he'd have as a seniors bit player.

                              And think what we could get for Luke Parker as a Premiership player. Parker and our R1 pick for Priddis?
                              LOL

                              Comment

                              • rojo
                                Opti-pessi-misti
                                • Mar 2009
                                • 1103

                                Trade Luke Parker? Over my dead body!! He is one player who is definitely heading towards star status.

                                As much as I love Goodesy, I too concede that this year should be his last, especially if we win the GF. It was interesting to hear Luke Ball say that when Collingwood decided not to offer him another year he was disappointed and felt he had the desire and was physically able to go on. Then his last game, v the Hawks, showed him it had been the right decision not to go on.

                                Comment

                                Working...