Changes for Rnd 15 V Brisbane Lions

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • 707
    Veterans List
    • Aug 2009
    • 6204

    #16
    Originally posted by ernie koala
    Towers papers should be stamped...

    He's been given plenty of chances, and has proved to be a soft and ineffectual footballer at senior AFL level.
    Agree, did bugger all last night, Nankers had as many touches!

    McGlynn is still weeks away, will need to be fit and at least one maybe two in the NEAFL before a recall. Heeney on limited time this week, will need two full games in the NEAFL. Should be available about the same time as Rohan gets back.

    But first and foremost get Towers out!

    Comment

    • Doctor
      Bay 29
      • Sep 2003
      • 2757

      #17
      Considering Ted was already back on the bench by the end of the game, and that we have a 9 day break before our next match, I suspect he'll be right. Changes, as usual, won't happen for the sake of it.

      In: Tippett, Franklin
      Out: Rohan, Nankervis
      Sub: Towers

      If Pyke is out again, Nankervis may keep his place but I still think TD is more likely.
      Today's a draft of your epitaph

      Comment

      • Puppy Eyes
        Pushing for Selection
        • Apr 2009
        • 85

        #18
        Towers does my absolute head in but history says that when they persist with a bloke like that in the seniors, it's usually for good reason. They must see something in him. I just wish I could see it too.

        Comment

        • MattW
          Veterans List
          • May 2011
          • 4220

          #19
          Towers was BOG last NEAFL game, wasn't he? To me he looks low on confidence, snatching, fumbling, dropping marks, like he expects to make a mistake. He needs a break out game to bring his NEAFL confidence to the AFL.

          Still, he should now hold his spot until either Rohan, McGlynn or Heeney are ready. I'm interested in who won't be in the team when Heeney, McGlynn and Rohan are back in. Towers, Cunningham and... Shaw? Reckon that third spot is between Shaw and Jones. Jones was promising last night - that sprint out of defence to (I think) set up our last goal was very exciting.

          Comment

          • barry
            Veterans List
            • Jan 2003
            • 8499

            #20
            No change

            Comment

            • rojo
              Opti-pessi-misti
              • Mar 2009
              • 1103

              #21

              Comment

              • Mug Punter
                On the Rookie List
                • Nov 2009
                • 3325

                #22
                What I think will happen not what I 'd like

                IN: Tippett, Franklin; Rohan; Hewett
                OUT: Pyke; Heeney; McGlynn; Cunningham

                Towers does my head in but clearly they see something in him so let's just give him 3-4 games in a row and then make a final judgement. I'm also keen to see Nanka given a good taste this year and I'd like to think Zak is now in for good.

                Harry is becoming a bit of a fall guy but I'd like to see Hewett given a chance.

                Comment

                • undy
                  Fatal error: Allowed memo
                  • Mar 2003
                  • 1231

                  #23
                  Originally posted by Mug Punter
                  What I think will happen not what I 'd like

                  IN: Tippett, Franklin; Rohan; Hewett
                  OUT: Pyke; Heeney; McGlynn; Cunningham

                  Towers does my head in but clearly they see something in him so let's just give him 3-4 games in a row and then make a final judgement. I'm also keen to see Nanka given a good taste this year and I'd like to think Zak is now in for good.

                  Harry is becoming a bit of a fall guy but I'd like to see Hewett given a chance.
                  Why do you think McGlynn and Heeney will be dropped ? I'm curious.
                  Before you criticize a man, walk a mile in his shoes. That way you'll be a mile away and he'll be shoeless.

                  Comment

                  • ugg
                    Can you feel it?
                    Site Admin
                    • Jan 2003
                    • 15970

                    #24
                    The one everyone seems to be forgetting is Robinson. He's been named in the reserves team tomorrow and by that I assume he's over that leg injury. If so, he will be one of the leading candidates to replace Rohan.
                    Reserves live updates (Twitter)
                    Reserves WIKI -
                    Top Goalkickers| Best Votegetters

                    Comment

                    • Mug Punter
                      On the Rookie List
                      • Nov 2009
                      • 3325

                      #25
                      Originally posted by Mug Punter
                      What I think will happen not what I 'd like

                      IN: Tippett, Franklin; Rohan; Hewett
                      OUT: Pyke; Heeney; McGlynn; Cunningham

                      Towers does my head in but clearly they see something in him so let's just give him 3-4 games in a row and then make a final judgement. I'm also keen to see Nanka given a good taste this year and I'd like to think Zak is now in for good.

                      Harry is becoming a bit of a fall guy but I'd like to see Hewett given a chance.
                      Doh, should be

                      IN: Tippett, Franklin; Heeney; Hewett
                      OUT: Pyke; Rohan; Cunningham; Towers

                      Got the math seriously wrong there....

                      But think Towers won't be dropped

                      Comment

                      • Scottee
                        Senior Player
                        • Aug 2003
                        • 1585

                        #26
                        Originally posted by Mug Punter
                        Doh, should be

                        IN: Tippett, Franklin; Heeney; Hewett
                        OUT: Pyke; Rohan; Cunningham; Towers

                        Got the math seriously wrong there....

                        But think Towers won't be dropped
                        Had me seriously confused for a moment there MP!
                        Originally posted by MattW
                        Towers was BOG last NEAFL game, wasn't he? To me he looks low on confidence, snatching, fumbling, dropping marks, like he expects to make a mistake. He needs a break out game to bring his NEAFL confidence to the AFL.

                        Still, he should now hold his spot until either Rohan, McGlynn or Heeney are ready. I'm interested in who won't be in the team when Heeney, McGlynn and Rohan are back in. Towers, Cunningham and... Shaw? Reckon that third spot is between Shaw and Jones. Jones was promising last night - that sprint out of defence to (I think) set up our last goal was very exciting.
                        Originally posted by Mug Punter
                        What I think will happen not what I 'd like

                        IN: Tippett, Franklin; Rohan; Hewett
                        OUT: Pyke; Heeney; McGlynn; Cunningham

                        Towers does my head in but clearly they see something in him so let's just give him 3-4 games in a row and then make a final judgement. I'm also keen to see Nanka given a good taste this year and I'd like to think Zak is now in for good.

                        Harry is becoming a bit of a fall guy but I'd like to see Hewett given a chance.
                        We have them where we want them, everything is going according to plan!

                        Comment

                        • Auntie.Gerald
                          Veterans List
                          • Oct 2009
                          • 6480

                          #27
                          The towers issue is not about towers. It is actually about forward half defensive pressure and who can best play that role. Everything else is a distant 3rd

                          When I watch towers involvement I see a specific role requested by the coaches

                          The coaches want pressure applied on the opposition backline. That requires a very quick repeat set player.

                          Gary and dean and or mcglynn when picked are considered the best players to carry out this role in amongst our forwards rotation

                          Obviously the swans coaching dept want this to ensure less time for the opposition to make good decisions. This results in our team receiving easier opposition entries and or possible turnovers or locking down of play before it gets out.

                          The trade off is ?

                          I haven't heard what the towers haters would prefer given that this is not about towers for the coaches it is about pressure via speed in the forward line

                          There are only a couple of players that have the repeat set speed to carry out these constant sprints

                          Remembering just being able to angle a defensive kicker into areas we want to defend is a win.

                          The issue for the coaches is they want Max pressure in the forward line no 1

                          If this is the bloods way and it works then why is it that we don't see enough supporters acknowledge this selfless role as being for filled very well by towers ?

                          Let's be honest the team coaches and indv players know how vital this role is

                          They also know it is a frustrating exhausting boring @@@@ty role being the human beep test for 3 to 4 qtrs of footy ie chasing and steering the defence of the opposition and rarely getting a touch on the footy but it is obviously appreciated by the coaches and fellow players as it creates opportunities for us to wrestle back control tempo and build our attack to score
                          "be tough, only when it gets tough"

                          Comment

                          • Dosser
                            Just wild about Harry
                            • Mar 2011
                            • 1833

                            #28
                            Originally posted by Auntie.Gerald
                            The towers issue is not about towers. It is actually about forward half defensive pressure and who can best play that role. Everything else is a distant 3rd

                            When I watch towers involvement I see a specific role requested by the coaches

                            The coaches want pressure applied on the opposition backline. That requires a very quick repeat set player.

                            Gary and dean and or mcglynn when picked are considered the best players to carry out this role in amongst our forwards rotation

                            Obviously the swans coaching dept want this to ensure less time for the opposition to make good decisions. This results in our team receiving easier opposition entries and or possible turnovers or locking down of play before it gets out.

                            The trade off is ?

                            I haven't heard what the towers haters would prefer given that this is not about towers for the coaches it is about pressure via speed in the forward line

                            There are only a couple of players that have the repeat set speed to carry out these constant sprints

                            Remembering just being able to angle a defensive kicker into areas we want to defend is a win.

                            The issue for the coaches is they want Max pressure in the forward line no 1

                            If this is the bloods way and it works then why is it that we don't see enough supporters acknowledge this selfless role as being for filled very well by towers ?

                            Let's be honest the team coaches and indv players know how vital this role is

                            They also know it is a frustrating exhausting boring @@@@ty role being the human beep test for 3 to 4 qtrs of footy ie chasing and steering the defence of the opposition and rarely getting a touch on the footy but it is obviously appreciated by the coaches and fellow players as it creates opportunities for us to wrestle back control tempo and build our attack to score
                            If this is true then football skill becomes completely irrelevant. Why dont we just recruit an olympic sprinter for the role?

                            Comment

                            • ernie koala
                              Senior Player
                              • May 2007
                              • 3251

                              #29
                              AG, I don't agree with your view that he fills the forward pressure role very well.

                              Forward pressure involves sticking your tackles. Towers is more your turnstile type tackler.

                              He chases but that's about it...And when the ball comes his way he's like a startled bunny.

                              IMO, he's got to go.

                              Do you not think B Jack would perform his role better? I do.
                              Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it's time to pause and reflect... MT

                              Comment

                              • aguy
                                Senior Player
                                • Mar 2014
                                • 1324

                                #30
                                OUT: Rohan Pyke Towers
                                IN Tippett Buddy Robinson

                                Pyke did look a bit sore. So I think he gets another rest and nanko and tippo share the ruck duties against Brisbane without Martin

                                I would get Cunningham to play rohans role Cunningham had a pretty good game after coming on and Robinson is the sub.

                                Comment

                                Working...