2016 Team
The rules do keep changing (and some clubs want the rookie list concept to be scrapped altogether, so that there is just one list of senior players that can be used for selection).
However I THINK the current rules are:
. A minimum of 38 and maximum of 40 on senior list (GWS & GCS have had different list specifications, not sure when these fall back)
. No minimum but a maximum of six on rookie list, so a maximum total list of 44 altogether (excluding Category B rookies).
. Up to three additional Category B rookies (which includes international recruits)
. Special rules for Irish rookies (presumably because these are thought to be less speculative recruits) - up to one as a Category B rookie but each additional Irish rookie deemed to be a Category A rookie.
From the above I assume O'Riordan is counted as a Category B rookie. And that the Swans don't HAVE to have a total list of 44.
But I'm not sure what underlies your question.
I think, in general, rookie player payments sit outside the total player payments counted as the salary cap. So I don't see any advantage to the Swans even if they could count O'Riordan as a Category A rookie.
And I particularly don't see any advantage in running with a list of less than 44 in total - although the strategy of only having 38 on the senior list has been very helpful in managing salary cap pressure in recent years.
The rules do keep changing (and some clubs want the rookie list concept to be scrapped altogether, so that there is just one list of senior players that can be used for selection).
However I THINK the current rules are:
. A minimum of 38 and maximum of 40 on senior list (GWS & GCS have had different list specifications, not sure when these fall back)
. No minimum but a maximum of six on rookie list, so a maximum total list of 44 altogether (excluding Category B rookies).
. Up to three additional Category B rookies (which includes international recruits)
. Special rules for Irish rookies (presumably because these are thought to be less speculative recruits) - up to one as a Category B rookie but each additional Irish rookie deemed to be a Category A rookie.
From the above I assume O'Riordan is counted as a Category B rookie. And that the Swans don't HAVE to have a total list of 44.
But I'm not sure what underlies your question.
I think, in general, rookie player payments sit outside the total player payments counted as the salary cap. So I don't see any advantage to the Swans even if they could count O'Riordan as a Category A rookie.
And I particularly don't see any advantage in running with a list of less than 44 in total - although the strategy of only having 38 on the senior list has been very helpful in managing salary cap pressure in recent years.



Comment