#AFL Round 15 Richmond v Sydney Etihad 7.20 pm EST 28 June 2018 #SydneySwans #SwansTigers

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Agent 86
    Senior Player
    • Aug 2004
    • 1690

    #AFL Round 15 Richmond v Sydney Etihad 7.20 pm EST 28 June 2018 #SydneySwans #SwansTigers

    Originally posted by aardvark
    My problem with Hanners is he is running at about half pace and struggles to kick more than thirty meters. If Horse can't see that then he has a problem.
    We?ve worked our way to near top of the ladder - but the run home is very tough. All bar 1 game against finals contenders - so top 4 looking dodgy. Buddy might miss a week or 2 & Jack, Rohan might see some time in the 2nds. Not the right time for a clean out.

    Comment

    • AnnieH
      RWOs Black Sheep
      • Aug 2006
      • 11332

      Well, that was pretty crap.
      Who invited Rose?
      Hanners is a dead-set joke. During the fox telecast, at half time, they did a stat thing on his numbers. He is doing approximately a third of what he was doing three years ago.
      Wild speculation, unsubstantiated rumours, silly jokes and opposition delight in another's failures is what makes an internet forum fun.
      Blessed are the cracked for they are the ones who let in the light.

      Comment

      • Matty10
        Senior Player
        • Jun 2007
        • 1331

        We didn?t win. That sucks. But it wasn?t a disaster.

        We butchered the ball and didn?t give first option often enough, then ran out of legs in the end (probably out of despondency as much as anything else). We are good enough to beat Richmond - with less errors, we may have done that tonight.

        Comment

        • mcs
          Travelling Swannie!!
          • Jul 2007
          • 8168

          Originally posted by Hotpotato
          10 goals 5 points to Richmond on turnovers .
          There's a quick and dirty summary of the game right there.
          "You get the feeling that like Monty Python's Black Knight, the Swans would regard amputation as merely a flesh wound."

          Comment

          • Ludwig
            Veterans List
            • Apr 2007
            • 9359

            Originally posted by aardvark
            My problem with Hanners is he is running at about half pace and struggles to kick more than thirty meters. If Horse can't see that then he has a problem.
            I agree with this. One or two games, okay, but Hanners has been playing like this all year. I don't care how many possessions he gets, in fact, the fewer the better, because bad things happens when he does get the ball.

            He's too good a player to go on like this. He needs to get right whatever is wrong with him. I don't think he should play senior footy, or perhaps any footy, the rest of this year. To say he's in a bit of a slump, in so many words, is simply false an obvious for all to see. Let's try to get him ready to have a full and productive pre-season for 2019.

            Fox and O'Riordan have been playing well in the reserves all year. Let's get them in to replace Hanners and Jack. Towers can come in for Rohan. We'll see how Foote and Dawson go over the comings weeks in the reserves.

            We probably won't be good enough this year, but our younger players have been revelations, so there's still hope if we can move out some of the dead wood in team that played tonight. If it's not good enough, so be it. We'll just be in a better draft position to get Blakey and hopefully a few other good prospects.

            Comment

            • stevoswan
              Veterans List
              • Sep 2014
              • 8560

              As good as Sinclair's been and I love him and he's absolutely doing the job, I still lament big Toby not being with us anymore. Callum (39ho, 10p, 5t) was shaded by Nanka tonight......The latter's stats, 41 hit outs, 18 possessions and a game high 10 tackles. He's consistent, week in, week out.....can't help thinking we lost a good one there but I can understand why we let him go. If we'd had a crystal ball......

              Comment

              • mcs
                Travelling Swannie!!
                • Jul 2007
                • 8168

                Originally posted by Meg
                Pleased that someone else thinks that - I agree 100%.
                Completely agree also - he knew precisely what he was doing, but will plead it was accidental, and there probably won't be enough evidence for it to be anything but careless. Don't like that guy at all.
                "You get the feeling that like Monty Python's Black Knight, the Swans would regard amputation as merely a flesh wound."

                Comment

                • stevoswan
                  Veterans List
                  • Sep 2014
                  • 8560

                  Originally posted by AnnieH
                  Well, that was pretty crap.
                  Who invited Rose?
                  Hanners is a dead-set joke. During the fox telecast, at half time, they did a stat thing on his numbers. He is doing approximately a third of what he was doing three years ago.

                  Comment

                  • gazza
                    Warming the Bench
                    • Mar 2005
                    • 329

                    Originally posted by AnnieH
                    Well, that was pretty crap.
                    Who invited Rose?
                    Hanners is a dead-set joke. During the fox telecast, at half time, they did a stat thing on his numbers. He is doing approximately a third of what he was doing three years ago.
                    good question who invited rose?great forward line franklin, franklin, franklin, why did he have to compete with 3 opponents? where were the rest?rose and rohan should be emergencies in the neafl next week. Sinclair did more chasing and tackling that half the team. grundy and alir were shown up for slowness. kennedy,franklin and parker shouldered all the load
                    forgotten 1996
                    2005 a much sweeter memory,2012 even better

                    Comment

                    • dimelb
                      pr. dim-melb; m not f
                      • Jun 2003
                      • 6889

                      Tigers' ball skills were the big difference. Handballs, kicks usually found their mark much more often than ours. Thank goodness their goal kicking wasn't up to the same standard - although they weren't too bad there as well. Their pressure was relentless - like we used to be. Even our best kicks - Lloyd, McVeigh etc. - were pressured into horrid disposals.

                      It'd be nice to kick to someone else apart from Buddy now and then. It would be even nicer to MARK THE BLOODY BALL instead of looking like a bad case of dropsy.

                      I'm inclined to agree that Jack's time is up. Hannebery is not playing well at present and I agree with the idea of getting him into shape in the seconds. I'd keep Rohan until Reid returns, but perhaps he needs time in the 2s to get his mojo back.

                      The umpiring was hot and cold but not the reason for the loss. And I agree with those who mentioned Ray with approval. He is good at his job.
                      He reminds him of the guys, close-set, slow, and never rattled, who were play-makers on the team. (John Updike, seeing Josh Kennedy in a crystal ball)

                      Comment

                      • stevoswan
                        Veterans List
                        • Sep 2014
                        • 8560

                        Originally posted by Markwebbos
                        I?m not convinced that Hanners needs to go. He is improving week by week. He just needs to learn to kick it to his own players.
                        There are others that worry me more namely:
                        Rohan, who I have defended until now
                        Jack, who?s biggest asset was speed and evasiveness no longer has it
                        Aliir, I?ve been dying to see him in the side, now I can?t wait for Melican to come back.
                        Rose, I agree it was a tough return to the team, but he?s not Papley.
                        There is a list of players not getting a game: Towers, Newman, Dawson, COR etc. Time to give some of them a go.

                        Is it bad I want Horse to drop one of Rohan / KJ next week? Why did ROK and Teddy get dropped so unceremoniously when others seem untouchable?
                        No, I want both dropped.....great post overall.

                        Comment

                        • crackedactor
                          Regular in the Side
                          • May 2012
                          • 919

                          Originally posted by Agent 86
                          Sad - but true. I?m not quite ready to give up on Hannebery just yet, tho. I reckon he?ll be back (if he can ever get his battered body right).

                          As for Rose, if they rate him, he needs time to develop at senior level. Tough game to get a start, no point giving kids just one game if they?ve earned a spot.
                          It's a pity but Jack looks gone. Hanners is slowly showing signs but disposal was poor. Rose is not up to it. Another poor effort from Rohan, but they will never drop him. Time for Dawson to come into the side.


                          Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

                          Comment

                          • aardvark
                            Veterans List
                            • Mar 2010
                            • 5685

                            It was good to see JPK back to his best.

                            Comment

                            • ugg
                              Can you feel it?
                              Site Admin
                              • Jan 2003
                              • 15971

                              Originally posted by stevoswan
                              As good as Sinclair's been and I love him and he's absolutely doing the job, I still lament big Toby not being with us anymore. Callum (39ho, 10p, 5t) was shaded by Nanka tonight......The latter's stats, 41 hit outs, 18 possessions and a game high 10 tackles. He's consistent, week in, week out.....can't help thinking we lost a good one there but I can understand why we let him go. If we'd had a crystal ball......
                              The Swans never saw Nanker as a viable first ruck. Height was just a tad short. The stats do back this up as he is one of the lower ranked rucks in the AFL with hitout stats.

                              However it suits Richmond?s style as they aren?t the least bit fussed if they lose the clearance backing their top notch pressure to force the opposition to cough up the ball.

                              And as you?ve noted the other thing Nanker is excellent at is his tackling.
                              Reserves live updates (Twitter)
                              Reserves WIKI -
                              Top Goalkickers| Best Votegetters

                              Comment

                              • Agent 86
                                Senior Player
                                • Aug 2004
                                • 1690

                                Originally posted by gazza
                                .?grundy and alir were shown up for slowness. kennedy,franklin and parker shouldered all the load
                                Reg has been massive this year, so I can forgive him tonight. Aliir is not slow - just has no idea where he should be at stimes. He Rarely gets beaten in the air though, but Jack R was possessed tonight. Hard not to be impressed with the Tigers - way too good.

                                Comment

                                Working...