A couple of stats stand out for me. Firstly, Richmond scored 81 points from our turnovers. Secondly, the tackles inside 50 were in Richmond's favour, 22 - 2. Which I'm sure contributed to the first stat. Richmond laying tackles in attack obviously increased their chances of turning it over in a scoring position. While our inability to lay a tackle up forward, alternatively increased Richmond's opportunities to rebound it the length of the field.
And if I remember rightly, this is not the first time that we poor forward tackle numbers. Why I don't know? I don't think that it's lack of effort. Is it poor structure and poor positioning? Is there a lack of communication? Is there something wrong with the forward coaching? I mean, I don't think we had that problem when Kirk was forward coach?
And if I remember rightly, this is not the first time that we poor forward tackle numbers. Why I don't know? I don't think that it's lack of effort. Is it poor structure and poor positioning? Is there a lack of communication? Is there something wrong with the forward coaching? I mean, I don't think we had that problem when Kirk was forward coach?

Comment