Respectfully disagree. The MRP are accountable for their decisions but there shouldn’t be “repercussions” per se, at least not as judged by the public. If the AFL believe that the MRP have erred, they can dismiss the MRP - just as the MRP are the judiciary for the players, so to are the AFL the judiciary for the MRP.
I’ve read it. As it transpired. All it told me that if he got a week this time, he should have got at least a week the first time.
while I can see your point, why on earth would any RWO member have wanted BBBH in 2005 or Dunks in 1996 to have been rubbed out?
We can be far more objective when it isn’t our players or going to compromise our team.
I’ve read it. As it transpired. All it told me that if he got a week this time, he should have got at least a week the first time.
while I can see your point, why on earth would any RWO member have wanted BBBH in 2005 or Dunks in 1996 to have been rubbed out?
We can be far more objective when it isn’t our players or going to compromise our team.

Comment