2020 trading, drafting and list management: players and personnel
Collapse
X
-
-
Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkComment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
And we might be in for a bit of a nervous wait on draft night. Though I think that depends on how Adelaide view their KPF situation. It should be okay, if they think they already have enough, with Walker, Fogarty, Himmelberg, and possibly Frampton and Lynch. If not, it's easy to imagine a scenario where the three gun KPFs go before our pick.
That is, if Adelaide decide they want a KPF, they first bid on Ugle-Hagan; because he's touted as the best player in the draft and to keep the Bulldogs honest. Assuming that the Bulldogs match, Adelaide could then take local lad, Thilthorpe. Since North are shopping around Brown and have culled Wood (deadwood?), they might be planning on taking a KPF at the draft; so they take McDonald. Which might leave many of us feeling disappointed.
Although that scenario, does rely on North making, what I perceive as the most rational decision. So, maybe we'll be okay?Comment
-
With GWS, Geelong and us all looking for a ruckman, it's not going to be easy to get someone we're happy with. A lot hangs on what happens with Daniher, as he's one of the better stand in ruckman for a forward. So if he comes to us, Joe, Sinclair, Reid and Aliir can all do reasonable jobs pretending to be ruckmen. We might be able to get by. Maybe we can get Thilthorpe in the draft. There are some options around other than Preuss, who I don't see as a good long term solution. We still want someone quick in the middle.Comment
-
With GWS, Geelong and us all looking for a ruckman, it's not going to be easy to get someone we're happy with. A lot hangs on what happens with Daniher, as he's one of the better stand in ruckman for a forward. So if he comes to us, Joe, Sinclair, Reid and Aliir can all do reasonable jobs pretending to be ruckmen. We might be able to get by. Maybe we can get Thilthorpe in the draft. There are some options around other than Preuss, who I don't see as a good long term solution. We still want someone quick in the middle.
Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkComment
-
And steal is a good description of most NGA selections. I suspect that the Victorian clubs pre-draft involvement, is along the lines of checking the promising kids in their zones, to see if any of them have ethnic sounding names or look a bit dark. Then perhaps running a workshop or hosting a tour of the premises, as a bit of a bonding exercise. Et voila, go to the top of the draft.
But anyway, definitely agree that our midfield has plenty of promising depth and that we should prioritize other areas. In regards to young mids, we have a few that you haven't mentioned. Warner was recruited as a hard at it, inside mid. He impressed enough to get a debut, and did a few good things, despite being played out of position. With another preseason and some game time in the VFL, he'll probably be repaying the investment by the second half of next season. Ling was signed as a mid, and is skilful enough to still make a name for himself there. Wicks and Bell are excellent tacklers and both are combative enough to spend time inside. Florent of course. And at a slightly higher age bracket, Heeney, Papley and Mills/Godot, can all rotate into our centre set up, for a bit of variation. So, no real need to recruit a midfielder.
In contrast, there seems a real need for a KPF. Buddy might come good, or he might not. Reid isn't quite good enough to lead the attack. McCartin now looks like he's going to become a gun defender and Blakey looks like he is going to develop as an exciting and hard to match up on, hybrid player. Something like, one half outside mid, one quarter inside mid and one quarter forward flanker; but not a KPF. Which leaves McLean and Amartey: who while promising, are both more second ruck and deep forward types. I'm not sure if either have the running power to be dominant KPFs (hmmm, I wonder if my deranged predictive text was agreeing with me? It just changed KPFs to Logs).
So, I definitely think either McDonald or Thilthorpe with our pick 3. The vision of both does look encouraging. McDonald can clunk a mark, kick straight and long, and seems to have footy smarts. While Thilthorpe reminds me a bit of the King brothers. At 200cm he can spend time in the ruck, but he's quick and has strong hands. Would be very happy with either.Comment
-
I'm not convinced about Preuss. Someone asked whether anyone has seen him play a good game and the answer from me is a no.
I wonder with Aliir potentially playing as a ruck / forward full-time, his ruck work will improve, allowing him to share more of the ruck load with Sinclair (or Naismith, not holding my breath!). This, could lead to an improved output from our on ballers, who should be getting better anyway, without having to find a new ruckman.Comment
-
-
I'm not convinced about Preuss. Someone asked whether anyone has seen him play a good game and the answer from me is a no.
I wonder with Aliir potentially playing as a ruck / forward full-time, his ruck work will improve, allowing him to share more of the ruck load with Sinclair (or Naismith, not holding my breath!). This, could lead to an improved output from our on ballers, who should be getting better anyway, without having to find a new ruckman.Comment
-
And we might be in for a bit of a nervous wait on draft night. Though I think that depends on how Adelaide view their KPF situation. It should be okay, if they think they already have enough, with Walker, Fogarty, Himmelberg, and possibly Frampton and Lynch. If not, it's easy to imagine a scenario where the three gun KPFs go before our pick.
That is, if Adelaide decide they want a KPF, they first bid on Ugle-Hagan; because he's touted as the best player in the draft and to keep the Bulldogs honest. Assuming that the Bulldogs match, Adelaide could then take local lad, Thilthorpe. Since North are shopping around Brown and have culled Wood (deadwood?), they might be planning on taking a KPF at the draft; so they take McDonald. Which might leave many of us feeling disappointed.
Although that scenario, does rely on North making, what I perceive as the most rational decision. So, maybe we'll be okay?
Sydney has the third live pick, so we only need to shortlist three players for consideration. For talls, that would be Thilthorpe, McDonald, and one other.
I have said before that Sydney may end up splitting pick 3 for two later first-round picks (eg: Geelong's provisional picks 15 and 16). This would maximise the chances of drafting both Campbell and Gulden. I hope we don't split pick 3 and instead trade for the additional picks we need. Last year, it was speculated that Melbourne would split their pick 3, but they ended up taking it to the draft and picking Luke Jackson."Unbelievable!" -- Nick Davis leaves his mark on the 2005 semi finalComment
-
I'm not convinced about Preuss. Someone asked whether anyone has seen him play a good game and the answer from me is a no.
I wonder with Aliir potentially playing as a ruck / forward full-time, his ruck work will improve, allowing him to share more of the ruck load with Sinclair (or Naismith, not holding my breath!). This, could lead to an improved output from our on ballers, who should be getting better anyway, without having to find a new ruckman.
Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkComment
-
Has anyone seen Preuss actually play a good game? I know I haven't.
I know he looks like a ruckman, but I haven't seen him play like an AFL standard ruck. And I'm not talking Nic Nat or Gawn level; just an ability to win some taps, make space for the mids, take the odd grab around the ground, and kick an occasional goal.Comment
-
Comment
Comment