Joeykanga, I’m happy that you’re a supporter of JB. I like his effort and he gives his best but- it’s not just about the stats. He tends to overrun the ball a lot. He and Wicks have similar roles and unfortunately I can’t see either in our best 22 unless they contribute on the scoreboard or with assists. Please show me a similar role played by a forward in the most successful team of the last 4 years- they ALL contributed!
Changes to R22 Against North Melbourne
Collapse
X
-
-
Changes for finals will be
Chad for Wicks
Mills for Rowbottom
Lance for Mclean
Lloyd for Melican
Then we will have our full best 22 out thereComment
-
Why not Logan? Can reserve followers confirm that he has been playing well.
Happy that Melican is in. Why does Fox stay?
Delighted that Campbell is back. Hoping that we get a backline set up of J-Mac, Campbell and Blakey driving off half back.
Does anyone know the extent of Lloyd’s injury?
Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkComment
-
I suppose Wicks will be the one to try to shut down Aaron Hall, who starts off much of their offence. The Roos will have a couple of tall young forwards this week in Larkey and Comben. I hope we don't see Rampe trying to play either of them, now that we have 2 legit KPDs. I think this is the best defensive unit we can have going into finals. I hope Melican can ramp up to speed quicker than he usually does.
Could be difficult, especially if we win and we have no new injuries. Wicks seems unlikely to be dropped. And with Lloyd and Mills a good chance of returning next week, it's hard to see the opening for Warner. It may take a few poor performances to give him a shot, but he certainly must be next in line with any injury or form drop from our current squad.Last edited by Ludwig; 12 August 2021, 07:08 PM.Comment
-
Lord, someone will be crying under the Chad poster above his bed.
Anyway, I’m a bit more optimistic on Melican than some others on here, though he does take a couple of games to get back to full touch and speed. What’ll be interesting is how they use Fox and Campbell. Does Fox push higher up the ground, or take on some of Lloyd’s role, or is Campbell pegged for that?'Delicious' is a fun word to sayComment
-
Could be difficult, especially if we win and we have no new injuries. Wicks seems unlikely to be dropped. And with Lloyd and Mills a good chance of returning next week, it's hard to see the opening for Warner. It may take a few poor performances to give him a shot, but he certainly must be next in line with any injury or form drop from our current squad.Comment
-
Comment
-
No, I don't know it. Warner is a very good prospect and has done great in his 2nd year. Shame about the injury. But he's never played Wicks' role, and I don't see him as a Wicks replacement. I also don't see him a an upgrade on Rowbottom in the midfield. Rowbottom is more versatile and has a better overall game, even if Warner is more capable of the spectacular, which catches the attention.Comment
-
No, I don't know it. Warner is a very good prospect and has done great in his 2nd year. Shame about the injury. But he's never played Wicks' role, and I don't see him as a Wicks replacement. I also don't see him a an upgrade on Rowbottom in the midfield. Rowbottom is more versatile and has a better overall game, even if Warner is more capable of the spectacular, which catches the attention.Comment
-
Great changes this week. I'm not a fan of Lloyd, but know that it's just rest and he'll be there through finals. So be it.
Campbell - where he plays is really interesting. If he's a Lloyd replacement, then you'd struggle to see him getting retained for finals, with Lloyd due back. So he's probably competing with Fox for the last position in the back 7.
Warner clearly isn't ready yet, otherwise he'd either be in, or an emergency. The type of injury he had isn't easy to come back from. We're only just seeing Campbell return, and Warner occurred later.
The comments about both McLean and Wicks highlight one thing - people don't understand the role of the different parts of our forward line.
No, Wicks cannot be easily replaced by Papley, or Warner, or McDonald. It's a completely different role. It's a shut down role - you give that to Papley and you sacrifice 3 goals a game.
And McDonald isn't a key forward yet. Any of McKay, Tarrant or Walker would rag doll him. He's not ready to be a key target. McLean is capable of being serviceable in that role.
And Amartey is sitting behind Reid for the forward/ruck role.
Arguing over some of these different players is really apples and oranges. Just because they are all forwards doesn't make them the same.Comment
-
At any rate, maybe I was a bit harsh on young Stephens but I’m frustrated with his form, like most. However, I don’t see the point of playing him for a game or two and then dropping him. Like James Bell, he needs a run of games to give us a proper appraisal.
You do realise that we will need to delist some players after the finals. The club will be making the tough calls like last year on Robbie Fox. I was wrong about including young Stephens as clearly he has ability and needs to be developed. Just don’t like him receiving the Dean Towers treatment.Comment
-
Comment
-
Great changes this week. I'm not a fan of Lloyd, but know that it's just rest and he'll be there through finals. So be it.
Campbell - where he plays is really interesting. If he's a Lloyd replacement, then you'd struggle to see him getting retained for finals, with Lloyd due back. So he's probably competing with Fox for the last position in the back 7.
Warner clearly isn't ready yet, otherwise he'd either be in, or an emergency. The type of injury he had isn't easy to come back from. We're only just seeing Campbell return, and Warner occurred later.
The comments about both McLean and Wicks highlight one thing - people don't understand the role of the different parts of our forward line.
No, Wicks cannot be easily replaced by Papley, or Warner, or McDonald. It's a completely different role. It's a shut down role - you give that to Papley and you sacrifice 3 goals a game.
And McDonald isn't a key forward yet. Any of McKay, Tarrant or Walker would rag doll him. He's not ready to be a key target. McLean is capable of being serviceable in that role.
And Amartey is sitting behind Reid for the forward/ruck role.
Arguing over some of these different players is really apples and oranges. Just because they are all forwards doesn't make them the same.
I would rather play someone who can cause damage himself- another Paps would be great!Comment
-
One change - Sam Reid will play for the first time as a father of two. Kim and Sam’s baby daughter arrived earlier this week in Melbourne.
Kim should be made No. 1 Swans ticketholder next year for her devotion to the Swans’ cause. Moved to Queensland heavily pregnant, and with a toddler, prepared to have her baby there, spent 14 days in hotel quarantine, and then had to move to Melbourne and give birth there instead.
Sam, you need to be BOG this week to match Kim’s performance!Comment
-
Lord, someone will be crying under the Chad poster above his bed.
Anyway, I’m a bit more optimistic on Melican than some others on here, though he does take a couple of games to get back to full touch and speed. What’ll be interesting is how they use Fox and Campbell. Does Fox push higher up the ground, or take on some of Lloyd’s role, or is Campbell pegged for that?
I also agree Fox and Campbell are the two most interesting positionally. Don't think Campbell has the tank to play on the wing (for long), so does he play HB or even HF? We've got a lot more players to cover Lloyd than we used to, those decent tanks and more penetration on their kicks than him - Dawson, JMac, Golden etc.
And does Melican replace Fox or Rampe in a KPD role?Comment
Comment