Taranto is a real threat and has really impressed in the last month or so. We can't be too negative but there are a couple we need to lockdown such as Green and Himmelberg as well as Taranto. The rest of their forward line just need our backs to man up and play their game. Melican can play Hogan, McCartin on Himmelberg and Rampke on Green. Our midfield need to on their game as Mumford will be back.
Swans vs GWS - elimination final
Collapse
X
-
I have to disagree with some of the negative comments regarding Lloyd's kicking. He is one of the best kicks on the team. A lot of his kicks are easy ones, nonetheless, he has the best disposal efficiency at the Swans. Someone must think he's a pretty good kick to make him the designated kickout. (Provisional TBD).
Wicks didn't do too good a job on Brad Hill few weeks back. I would be hesitant to put him on Whitfield. I would leave Wicks closer to goal, and leading up into the midfield when needed.
I think recall Hewett playing on Whitfield in the past. He is capable, but needed in the middle with Mills and Kennedy both likely out for the game.
I would consider Campbell on Whitfield. I'm not sure how it would go. Maybe whoever is closest to him when the Giants get the ball should try to stick with him for that play. It's not a good idea to give him too much freedom.The Giants also have Kelly, who is similar in ability to hit targets in dangerous spots.Comment
-
I would have Chad in at around 60% of the centre bounces, but he would need around 30% bench time. Short sharp bursts from the comeback Chad.
You could move Dawson into a more inside midfield role to use his strength and magnificent skill skill set. Campbell then could move to the left wing when Dawson plays inside.
Need more from Florent and you need Rowbottom to continue his trajectory of improving form.Comment
-
Well tickets booked , never thought I would ever see the swans play a final in my home state , but these are crazy times .
I got on at 2:02 and was 180 odd in the que so at least a few Swans members in Tassie
Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkComment
-
I have to disagree with some of the negative comments regarding Lloyd's kicking. He is one of the best kicks on the team. A lot of his kicks are easy ones, nonetheless, he has the best disposal efficiency at the Swans. Someone must think he's a pretty good kick to make him the designated kickout. (Provisional TBD).
Wicks didn't do too good a job on Brad Hill few weeks back. I would be hesitant to put him on Whitfield. I would leave Wicks closer to goal, and leading up into the midfield when needed.
I think recall Hewett playing on Whitfield in the past. He is capable, but needed in the middle with Mills and Kennedy both likely out for the game.
I would consider Campbell on Whitfield. I'm not sure how it would go. Maybe whoever is closest to him when the Giants get the ball should try to stick with him for that play. It's not a good idea to give him too much freedom.The Giants also have Kelly, who is similar in ability to hit targets in dangerous spots.
But he's not the bloke, like say Dawson or Gulden, that'll take on the difficult or penetrating kick that completely busts open play. And that's the role Whitfield plays for them too. And along with Kelly when in form (or maybe Greene going inside 50), the only dangerous kick they have.
I'd say we have Dawson, Gulden, JMac, Buddy, Heeney, Rampe, Florent on a good day (fingers crossed), and Campbell if he gets into it, that can all do THAT kick. It's a real point of difference.'Delicious' is a fun word to sayComment
-
Comment
-
Good on you. I got to two games at the Gold Coast and the boys are even more impressive live than on TV this year. Let's hope you see the same thumping of the Giants that I did (though hopefully the Swans remember to play the first quarter this time around.)Comment
-
So, from Horse's presser:
* He sounded like they'd be conservative with JPK
* Mills has pulled up ok and they haven't given up hope he can play this week (and you almost sense they'll give him every chance till warm up on the day)
* They wanted to tread slowly with Warner given he'd been out so long, was a second year player and needed conditioning till now - but sounds like he *might* be in the mix
* He played his best poker face on Reid, but certainly wasn't talking him up
* Amartey has had sore groin and only played half a scratch match last weekend
* Logan has had a small cheekbone crack, and only getting back into training now'Delicious' is a fun word to sayComment
-
I remember getting hit in the back of the head by my fifth form English teacher as I stared vacantly out the window at the (North Hobart)oval from
the classroom when I was supposed to be giving my summation of a Patrick White novel (a book I hadn't read of course) to the rest of the class. Those were the days.Comment
-
So, from Horse's presser:
* He sounded like they'd be conservative with JPK
* Mills has pulled up ok and they haven't given up hope he can play this week (and you almost sense they'll give him every chance till warm up on the day)
* They wanted to tread slowly with Warner given he'd been out so long, was a second year player and needed conditioning till now - but sounds like he *might* be in the mix
* He played his best poker face on Reid, but certainly wasn't talking him up
* Amartey has had sore groin and only played half a scratch match last weekend
* Logan has had a small cheekbone crack, and only getting back into training now
Ins: Chad (if Mills or JPK are out) Fox
Outs: Mills COR
McLean has done enough to keep his spot.
Possibility one of Clarke, Bell, Gray or Taylor might get a start if Horse not convinced about Chad's ability to run out a game (assuming JPK and Mills out). If that happened, would be a massive downgrade on Mills / JPK / ChadComment
-
Based on that, I'm going:
Ins: Chad (if Mills or JPK are out) Fox
Outs: Mills COR
McLean has done enough to keep his spot.
Possibility one of Clarke, Bell, Gray or Taylor might get a start if Horse not convinced about Chad's ability to run out a game (assuming JPK and Mills out). If that happened, would be a massive downgrade on Mills / JPK / Chad
I think Reid v McLean is the big question mark for me. It would be a huge call not to play Reid given his finals experience. I wasn't sure whether the team that played Saturday was our best 22 or they were still figuring things out? My instinct is that McLean has overtaken Reid in the eyes of the MC, but all will be revealed on Thursday!Comment
-
Gloveski, could you and our Tassie Swans PLEASE cheer loud enough for the rest of us who can't attend?
GO BLOODS!Comment
-
I think that York Park suits us because it is so big, because we have lots of run and excellent kicks in the side, but particularly because Mummy is going to find it hard to keep up with Hickey (births permitting).We have them where we want them, everything is going according to plan!Comment
-
I understand the discussion on locking down opposition stars. However, if our pressure across the ground is strong like it has been in the games we have won, we won’t need to worry as much about individual tags. Man up without the ball and back our spread and run with it. If we go all tagging and defensive, I’d worry that we would play into their strengths of contest and go away from what’s made us successful this year.Comment
Comment