Round 23: the other games. Is it that time already?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Bloods05
    Senior Player
    • Oct 2008
    • 1641

    Originally posted by KTigers
    Yes, is a sad indictment on our otherwise great city if it can't support two teams properly. I don't get the GWS hatred
    at all. It sounds remarkably like the rants of the VFL lovers down south. The GW$ tag is pretty lame. Our club has a
    bigger revenue each year, and a chunk of it flowed in from Qatar Airlines and the crypto mob. Maybe we should be
    called the $wans. Might be time to climb down from the high horse. It's a little unbecoming.
    They were set up to create a rivalry. Artificially, yes, but it doesn't seem to have worked for some people.

    Comment

    • KTigers
      Senior Player
      • Apr 2012
      • 2499

      Originally posted by Bloods05
      They were set up to create a rivalry. Artificially, yes, but it doesn't seem to have worked for some people.
      mmm.... "the rivalry".... actually at the game against GWS recently I heard them utter the classic "Battle Of The Bridge" phrase over the PA.
      I thought we'd put that one behind us. The other thing is they never explained which bridge they were talking about. Anzac, Gladesville,
      Sydney Harbour, Tom Uglys bridge, the bridge over the creek at the course? Anyway, the "rivalry" thing has always been totally lost on me.
      I meant aren't all the other teams our rivals in the comp. The rivalry thing was out in force yesterday arvo at the MCG I noticed. Poor old
      Carlton. Hard to wish that debacle on anyone. That was rough. Besides it let the Dogs in with their measly 12-and-10 record.

      Comment

      • Bloods05
        Senior Player
        • Oct 2008
        • 1641

        Originally posted by KTigers
        Anyway, the "rivalry" thing has always been totally lost on me.
        I meant aren't all the other teams our rivals in the comp.
        Yes, ALL the other teams are our rivals - including the Giants. The "local derby" thing has always struck me as a silly notion, confected by the AFL and the media. But what I don't understand is the sympathy from Swans supporters for a team created by the AFL marketing team and handed the Riverina as its academy zone. I have never detected any sympathy for the Swans from the Giants, either their supporters or the club administration.

        Comment

        • Doctor J.
          Senior Player
          • Feb 2003
          • 1310

          Originally posted by Maltopia
          7 News said Carlton was last to do it previously, in 1977.
          Yes Carlton in 1977, and we were the beneficiaries of it. Had to beat North who were 3rd on the ladder (eventual premiers) and hope that the Bulldogs would beat Carlton. In those days all games were played simultaneously, what a wild concept. At 3 qtr time the dogs were doing their bit, leading Carlton by nearly 6 goals the trouble was we were nearly 4 goals down. Came home with the wind behind us. I have memories of Mark Browning kicking a long goal to put us in front. Finals for only the second time in my life, what a great day to be at the footy.

          Comment

          • Doctor J.
            Senior Player
            • Feb 2003
            • 1310

            Originally posted by KTigers
            Yes, is a sad indictment on our otherwise great city if it can't support two teams properly. I don't get the GWS hatred
            at all. It sounds remarkably like the rants of the VFL lovers down south. The GW$ tag is pretty lame. Our club has a
            bigger revenue each year, and a chunk of it flowed in from Qatar Airlines and the crypto mob. Maybe we should be
            called the $wans. Might be time to climb down from the high horse. It's a little unbecoming.
            I had always assumed the GW$ tag was in reference to the financial support provided to them by the AFL not a reference to the sponsorship dollars they attract.

            Comment

            • KTigers
              Senior Player
              • Apr 2012
              • 2499

              Originally posted by Bloods05
              Yes, ALL the other teams are our rivals - including the Giants. The "local derby" thing has always struck me as a silly notion, confected by the AFL and the media. But what I don't understand is the sympathy from Swans supporters for a team created by the AFL marketing team and handed the Riverina as its academy zone. I have never detected any sympathy for the Swans from the Giants, either their supporters or the club administration.
              Swans fans criticising the Giants Academy Zone and vice versa are in danger of becoming a proxy warriors for the VFL. It's what they want and
              part of the divide & conquer strategy from the South. As mid 19th century on-baller Thomas Jefferson once said, "eternal vigilance is the price
              of liberty". I know a few GWS supporters. They would like their club to be like the Swans one day. They hate the Bulldogs at least as much as
              we do.

              Comment

              • KTigers
                Senior Player
                • Apr 2012
                • 2499

                Originally posted by Doctor J.
                I had always assumed the GW$ tag was in reference to the financial support provided to them by the AFL not a reference to the sponsorship dollars they attract.
                I guess if they got money from Qatar Airlines they wouldn't have to get so much from the AFL. They could be like us.

                Comment

                • stevoswan
                  Veterans List
                  • Sep 2014
                  • 8573

                  Originally posted by KTigers
                  mmm.... "the rivalry".... actually at the game against GWS recently I heard them utter the classic "Battle Of The Bridge" phrase over the PA.
                  I thought we'd put that one behind us. The other thing is they never explained which bridge they were talking about. Anzac, Gladesville,
                  Sydney Harbour, Tom Uglys bridge, the bridge over the creek at the course? Anyway, the "rivalry" thing has always been totally lost on me.
                  I meant aren't all the other teams our rivals in the comp. The rivalry thing was out in force yesterday arvo at the MCG I noticed. Poor old
                  Carlton. Hard to wish that debacle on anyone. That was rough. Besides it let the Dogs in with their measly 12-and-10 record.
                  I tend to agree with this. My 'hatred' for GWS has cooled over the past few seasons as I see them as just as much a victim of the AFL's Vic-centricity as us. Just look at the 2016 Preliminary Final, where they were crucified by Fairypup love just as much as we were a week later.....and have been since on a number of occasions. They also are affected by the removal of COLA, possibly more than us with their plethora of young talent being lured back to Victoria year after year. They are a NSW club being shafted by the same forces that shaft us. I find myself barracking for them much more these days.

                  Comment

                  • Buzz13
                    Pushing for Selection
                    • Aug 2012
                    • 85

                    Footy certainly is a game of inches. Had the siren blown 20 seconds earlier blues v dee's game we would be playing Fremantle at the SCG for a home preliminary final. Now I would say we are in the hardest part of the draw with Dee's, Lions and Tigers. Would rather be in the other half against Cats, Pies and Fremantle. What are others thoughts?

                    Comment

                    • liz
                      Veteran
                      Site Admin
                      • Jan 2003
                      • 16786

                      Originally posted by Buzz13
                      Footy certainly is a game of inches. Had the siren blown 20 seconds earlier blues v dee's game we would be playing Fremantle at the SCG for a home preliminary final. Now I would say we are in the hardest part of the draw with Dee's, Lions and Tigers. Would rather be in the other half against Cats, Pies and Fremantle. What are others thoughts?
                      We (or rather the players of the team we support) have it in their control which half of the draw they land up in. Win on Friday week and we're on "the other side".

                      Comment

                      • Buzz13
                        Pushing for Selection
                        • Aug 2012
                        • 85

                        Originally posted by liz
                        We (or rather the players of the team we support) have it in their control which half of the draw they land up in. Win on Friday week and we're on "the other side".
                        Yeah very true I guess Liz. Beat the dee's and chances are we play Collingwood or Freo at SCG for a spot in the GRAND final ???? Makes next week ultra important. Go Swans

                        Comment

                        • Bloods05
                          Senior Player
                          • Oct 2008
                          • 1641

                          Originally posted by KTigers
                          Swans fans criticising the Giants Academy Zone and vice versa are in danger of becoming a proxy warriors for the VFL. It's what they want and
                          part of the divide & conquer strategy from the South. As mid 19th century on-baller Thomas Jefferson once said, "eternal vigilance is the price
                          of liberty". I know a few GWS supporters. They would like their club to be like the Swans one day. They hate the Bulldogs at least as much as
                          we do.
                          OK then, explain to me why basing the GWS academy zone in the Riverina is not a travesty, given that academies are supposed to develop kids who would otherwise not be playing footy.

                          Comment

                          • KTigers
                            Senior Player
                            • Apr 2012
                            • 2499

                            Originally posted by Bloods05
                            OK then, explain to me why basing the GWS academy zone in the Riverina is not a travesty, given that academies are supposed to develop kids who would otherwise not be playing footy.
                            If the academies are "supposed to develop kids who would otherwise not be playing footy" why is the Swans Academy taking
                            so many kids from areas in Sydney where there have been large junior clubs that go back 25 years. These clubs are way bigger
                            than the junior clubs in the Riverina. Compared to Sydney, no one lives in the Riverina.

                            Comment

                            • stevoswan
                              Veterans List
                              • Sep 2014
                              • 8573

                              Originally posted by KTigers
                              If the academies are "supposed to develop kids who would otherwise not be playing footy" why is the Swans Academy taking
                              so many kids from areas in Sydney where there have been large junior clubs that go back 25 years. These clubs are way bigger
                              than the junior clubs in the Riverina. Compared to Sydney, no one lives in the Riverina.
                              But most play footy....Aussie Rules that is.....and some play it very well.

                              Comment

                              • stevoswan
                                Veterans List
                                • Sep 2014
                                • 8573

                                I see GWS has selected their new coach already...Adam Kingsley.

                                GWS Giants lock in long time Richmond Adam Kingsley as new senior coach

                                Comment

                                Working...