Rd 23 v St Kilda @ Marvel

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • gloveski
    Senior Player
    • Jan 2003
    • 1018

    Originally posted by DeadlyAkkuret
    What a feeling.

    Like everyone, there was that fleeting disappointment in the fact we missed out on second spot but Brisbane’s capitulation really made life hard.

    All said and done we finish third and we’re a huge chance here. We know that we bring our best against the best and Melbourne are still the best.

    Rowbottom - Some people were very, very wrong. His last month or so has been elite and last night he lead the way again. He’s the epitome of Sydney and our barometer as well.

    Warner - Tagged hard every week but that’s a great thing for his development. He’s yet to play his 40th game and he’s already terrifying opposition teams.

    Stephens - Hear me out, but he’s got Rolls Royce quality. The thing that can’t be trained but you see it in Mills and players like Hird and Burgoyne. I don’t necessarily think he’ll reach those heights but he oozes natural ability. He’ll go as far as he wants to.

    Hayward - Remarkably, he may still be underrated. He never seems to get much attention and there’s no fanfare around him, yet he’s been going at a goal a game for the best part of two seasons. He’s the perfect complimentary player for Logan, Heeney and Papley because they’re all play very different roles but when it gels it’s magnificent.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Well said agree with everything you have written


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

    Comment

    • royboy42
      Senior Player
      • Apr 2006
      • 2078

      Originally posted by gloveski
      Papa should be fine it will be 12 days between games


      Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
      Is it 12 clear days?

      Comment

      • i'm-uninformed2
        Reefer Madness
        • Oct 2003
        • 4653

        Originally posted by RogueSwan
        I would like to give a little praise to MacDonald. Maybe he wasn't so prolific up forward but, not for the first time, he seemed to run back hard to provide an exit option for our backs on a number of occasions
        I can't recall who, but in his draft year, one of the close draft watchers said his play would resemble Nick Reiwoldt for his ability to burn opponents running up and down the ground. He's got a bit of a way to go, obviously, but his work rate has been exceptional and he gets himself to a lot of contests too. As he grows stronger, he'll start pulling in some more marks, but for a second year KPF, we should be very comfortable with how he's tracking.
        'Delicious' is a fun word to say

        Comment

        • Agent 86
          Senior Player
          • Aug 2004
          • 1690

          Originally posted by royboy42
          Is it 12 clear days?
          Yes. Luckily, Thursday would have been 11. But Friday’s okay.

          Comment

          • Agent 86
            Senior Player
            • Aug 2004
            • 1690

            Originally posted by troyjones2525
            Obviously I am a huge fan of Chad (like we all are) but I have to disagree with you here... Chad basically had no impact on the game barring an excellent pass in the first qtr and his brilliant goal in the 2nd. He was well beaten by his young opponent who tagged him (was 17th ranked player by CD) and he'll hopefully learn from this because we really need more from him the next few weeks if we are going to make an impact in September!

            Sent from my SM-G998B using Tapatalk
            I have to admit that I was working and only half listening to the radio, but even then “no impact” sounds harsh, yeah?

            I’m assuming Windhager was the tag? If so, he’s taken some good scalps over the past month or so (including pantsing Neale last week).

            For me, it’s mind blowing that Chad has so quickly grown to such a damaging weapon that he gets tagged. No impact? Really?

            More concerning for me is that it sounded like we were getting smashed at every centre bounce and Saints clearances were off the charts. If mids get beaten like this vs Melbourne it could get ugly.

            Comment

            • Markwebbos
              Veterans List
              • Jul 2016
              • 7186

              I wonder if we deliberately avoided using our finals centre bounce setup in that game? I.e. we have something up our sleeve

              Comment

              • dejavoodoo44
                Veterans List
                • Apr 2015
                • 8727

                Originally posted by Markwebbos
                I wonder if we deliberately avoided using our finals centre bounce setup in that game? I.e. we have something up our sleeve
                I haven't watched a replay, but live, I was getting the impression that fortune was favouring the Saints at centre bounces. As in, they seemed to get quite a few clearances, where the ball bounced around with neither side getting a handle on it, until it ricocheted to a Saints player in a bit of space.

                Comment

                • TheBloods
                  Suspended by the MRP
                  • Feb 2020
                  • 2047

                  Originally posted by Agent 86
                  I have to admit that I was working and only half listening to the radio, but even then “no impact” sounds harsh, yeah?

                  I’m assuming Windhager was the tag? If so, he’s taken some good scalps over the past month or so (including pantsing Neale last week).

                  For me, it’s mind blowing that Chad has so quickly grown to such a damaging weapon that he gets tagged. No impact? Really?

                  More concerning for me is that it sounded like we were getting smashed at every centre bounce and Saints clearances were off the charts. If mids get beaten like this vs Melbourne it could get ugly.
                  We had nothing without Chad when he was tagged . Paps went off half time , Mills on the wing doesnt look right to me , Parker cant do it on his own much as he might seem superhuman ! You knew it was dire straits when we had to put Heeney in there to win a clearance . Get Roberts and Gus in !

                  Comment

                  • Mountain Man
                    Regular in the Side
                    • Feb 2008
                    • 910

                    Get Roberts and Gus in !

                    Instead of??

                    Comment

                    • Faunac8
                      Senior Player
                      • Mar 2014
                      • 1548

                      The last two games were probably our worst performances for centre bounce clearances and we won both games in spite of that .
                      Markwebbos may be on to something in that we chose not show our hand too early however centre clearances have not been one of our strengths throughout the year and we generally break even at best.
                      I prefer to focus on the areas where we are strong especially our inside 50 figures where we are pretty strong all round and have been a better team than our opponents over the year. If we had improved our kicking accuracy when we get it down in the fifty our percentage going in to the last round may have been better and removed the focus on percentage.

                      Comment

                      • stevoswan
                        Veterans List
                        • Sep 2014
                        • 8573

                        Originally posted by TheBloods
                        We had nothing without Chad when he was tagged . Paps went off half time , Mills on the wing doesnt look right to me , Parker cant do it on his own much as he might seem superhuman ! You knew it was dire straits when we had to put Heeney in there to win a clearance . Get Roberts and Gus in !
                        We had NOTHING?? I know you can't mention him in vain....but surely your 'agreement' doesn't mean you can't mention him in a positive light?

                        From The Mongrel Punt: "James Rowbottom is another youngster in the Swans midfield who is doing all the right things. He hits stoppages at speed, he spreads, and he is unafraid to do the hard stuff. Along with others mentioned in this review, he is a key to the Swans’ September fortunes."

                        Sydney v St KIlda - The Analyst's Corner - The Mongrel Punt

                        .....and did you catch last weeks TMP write up on James? You should check it out....but a warning, it might be a little embarrassing for you TB.

                        Comment

                        • TheBloods
                          Suspended by the MRP
                          • Feb 2020
                          • 2047

                          Originally posted by stevoswan
                          We had NOTHING?? I know you can't mention him in vain....but surely your 'agreement' doesn't mean you can't mention him in a positive light?

                          From The Mongrel Punt: "James Rowbottom is another youngster in the Swans midfield who is doing all the right things. He hits stoppages at speed, he spreads, and he is unafraid to do the hard stuff. Along with others mentioned in this review, he is a key to the Swans’ September fortunes."

                          Sydney v St KIlda - The Analyst's Corner - The Mongrel Punt

                          .....and did you catch last weeks TMP write up on James? You should check it out....but a warning, it might be a little embarrassing for you TB.
                          Chad is the spark in the mids . When he doesnt have it we loss it

                          Comment

                          • Agent 86
                            Senior Player
                            • Aug 2004
                            • 1690

                            Rd 23 v St Kilda @ Marvel

                            Originally posted by dejavoodoo44
                            I haven't watched a replay, but live, I was getting the impression that fortune was favouring the Saints at centre bounces. As in, they seemed to get quite a few clearances, where the ball bounced around with neither side getting a handle on it, until it ricocheted to a Saints player in a bit of space.
                            There was a CB that landed outside the circle that was called play on. Lead directly to a saints goal.

                            We got the bounce that counted, however, when Blakey pounced on it - Hayward goal!!

                            A few Malceski-like goals from WH.

                            Comment

                            • 111431
                              Regular in the Side
                              • Sep 2010
                              • 699

                              Originally posted by Faunac8
                              The last two games were probably our worst performances for centre bounce clearances and we won both games in spite of that .
                              Markwebbos may be on to something in that we chose not show our hand too early however centre clearances have not been one of our strengths throughout the year and we generally break even at best.
                              I prefer to focus on the areas where we are strong especially our inside 50 figures where we are pretty strong all round and have been a better team than our opponents over the year. If we had improved our kicking accuracy when we get it down in the fifty our percentage going in to the last round may have been better and removed the focus on percentage.
                              I was at the game. We seemed to have our A team in the middle most of the time. I did notice Mills out on the wing a couple of times but generally they were all rotating through there. I think Steele just did a number on us. We will need to be far better in the middle over the next 4 weeks

                              Comment

                              • liz
                                Veteran
                                Site Admin
                                • Jan 2003
                                • 16786

                                Originally posted by Agent 86

                                A few Malceski-like goals from WH.
                                Or Nick Davis like. Watching live yesterday, the stress of that second half meant I didn't appreciate quite the degree of difficulty - and thus of skill - of those two last Hayward goals. His improvement in the second half of this season is a large part of why we've finished in 3rd spot.

                                In the forward line he benefits from oppositions paying so much attention to Papley, Heeney and Buddy, but it's his work up and down the ground, and the contested marks he's been taking across half-back and along the wings that have elevated him to being a hugely important part of this team.

                                Comment

                                Working...