Swans related trade talk

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Rizzo
    On the Rookie List
    • Jan 2003
    • 655

    From those posted articles, it looks like Spida was giving the Hawks some mixed messages...then said he wanted to move to Sydney after talking with Roos and Hally (and after Ball retired and we won the premiership!). I'm sure he wants to get a premiership medal before he retires.

    This puts the Hawks in a difficult position. They wouldn't want to keep him if his heart isn't in it (at least I don't think this would be advantageous) but he's one of a handful of high profile players on their list. They want something for him.

    Could we trade Chambers on to the Hawks if they are looking for a ruckman? I don't think our coaching dept would do that to him but I was wondering if the rules allowed it...

    Comment

    • Ruckman
      Ego alta, ergo ictus
      • Nov 2003
      • 3990

      Well we've filled 2 of our 4 free (non veteran list) spots, leaving 2, do we still need 3 spaces to participate in the draft?

      Comment

      • Jeffers1984
        Veterans List
        • Jan 2003
        • 4564

        Originally posted by Rizzo


        Could we trade Chambers on to the Hawks if they are looking for a ruckman? I don't think our coaching dept would do that to him but I was wondering if the rules allowed it...
        Can't ontrade players.
        Official Driver Of The "Who Gives A @@@@ As The Player Will Get Delisted Anyway" Bandwagon.

        Comment

        • sydfan83
          Senior Player
          • Jan 2003
          • 2929

          Recruiting policy

          I remember reading the "Roos - off with his head" thread here a few months ago bagging him for reading 'Moneyball' - a book about a US baseball team that always 'topped up' rather than recruiting new talent, and always bombed out in the first week of the finals. Bearing in mind we've done the same thing with people like Jolly and Vogels, even with Craig Bolton and Nick Davis back in 2002/03, does this still apply now we've won the premiership?

          Link: Roos - off with his head

          Comment

          • NMWBloods
            Taking Refuge!!
            • Jan 2003
            • 15819

            Yet we were 4 seconds away from going out in straight sets (as per Moneyball comments)...
            Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.

            "[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."

            Comment

            • cruiser
              What the frack!
              • Jul 2004
              • 6114

              Originally posted by NMWBloods
              Yet we were 4 seconds away from going out in straight sets (as per Moneyball comments)...
              4 seconds away from a lynching!
              Occupational hazards:
              I don't eat animals since discovering this ability. I used to. But one day the lamb I was eating came through to me and ever since then I haven't been able to eat meat.
              - animal psychic Amanda de Warren

              Comment

              • Ryan Bomford
                On the Rookie List
                • Sep 2003
                • 652

                Re: Recruiting policy

                Originally posted by sydfan83
                I remember reading the "Roos - off with his head" thread here a few months ago bagging him for reading 'Moneyball' - a book about a US baseball team that always 'topped up' rather than recruiting new talent, and always bombed out in the first week of the finals. Bearing in mind we've done the same thing with people like Jolly and Vogels, even with Craig Bolton and Nick Davis back in 2002/03, does this still apply now we've won the premiership?

                Link: Roos - off with his head
                But the Oakland A's MoneyBall story and their lack of post-season success is not comparable to the Swans-AFL situtation for the simple reason that the A's lost out to teams like the Yankees and Red Sox who did not have salary cap restrictions.

                Comment

                • Ryan Bomford
                  On the Rookie List
                  • Sep 2003
                  • 652

                  What's impressing me about this trading period is that the Swans actually seem to have a game plan that they're executing to their advantage. For the time being the other squads just look lost.

                  Comment

                  • swansrule100
                    The quarterback
                    • May 2004
                    • 4538

                    Originally posted by Damien
                    Confirmation on the Offical Dons site.




                    The AFL site is not the official site of the club (think they are the only club to have a seperate site)
                    doesnt it mean they can pay lloyd and hird more to be part of their site?
                    Theres not much left to say

                    Comment

                    • sydfan83
                      Senior Player
                      • Jan 2003
                      • 2929

                      Re: Re: Recruiting policy

                      Originally posted by Ryan Bomford
                      But the Oakland A's MoneyBall story and their lack of post-season success is not comparable to the Swans-AFL situtation for the simple reason that the A's lost out to teams like the Yankees and Red Sox who did not have salary cap restrictions.
                      Not saying it was comparable or not, just having a friendly dig at the people who were calling for Roos' head because of it

                      Edit - I gave Davis as an example of one of the trades in my post, he probably is the exception to the rule in Moneyball in that he wanted to come home, and is arguably an example of the type of A-level players that the Oakland A's couldn't afford. (I haven't read Moneyball, just going by the original post)

                      But even Jason Ball was hardly a big-name player when he came to us in 2000 - and he was a big reason why we didn't bomb out in straight sets this year!
                      Last edited by Xie Shan; 6 October 2005, 07:11 PM.

                      Comment

                      • plumber dan
                        On the Rookie List
                        • Aug 2003
                        • 40

                        Actually if there is one coach (or coaching team) able to get the absolute maximum out of their players, it would have to be Roos'y and his team.
                        So hopefully we will be talking about the great deal we did to get Chambers and Richards this time next year.

                        Comment

                        • Destructive
                          Football Terrorist
                          • Jan 2003
                          • 976

                          Originally posted by ScottH
                          I would like to see Spida, but not at the expense of ROK. I think ROK is far more important to the Swans in the longer Term.
                          I agree.

                          110%
                          The Destructive Dan Experience - Featuring Teal.
                          Add me on Facebook - Danny Pinsuti (Except Suzi Olsen and her split personalities.)
                          238 AFL Games.

                          Comment

                          • Destructive
                            Football Terrorist
                            • Jan 2003
                            • 976

                            Originally posted by lachlanc
                            poos and wees for Hawthorn is great

                            where i come from they are also known as "two shades of @@@@"
                            Thats Gold!
                            The Destructive Dan Experience - Featuring Teal.
                            Add me on Facebook - Danny Pinsuti (Except Suzi Olsen and her split personalities.)
                            238 AFL Games.

                            Comment

                            • Bas
                              Veterans List
                              • Jan 2003
                              • 4457

                              Originally posted by Ruckman
                              Well we've filled 2 of our 4 free (non veteran list) spots, leaving 2, do we still need 3 spaces to participate in the draft?
                              Yes. At minimum.

                              If you add that Vogels will get promoted and possibly another.

                              There will be two or three delistings yet.
                              Last edited by Bas; 6 October 2005, 09:04 PM.
                              In memory of my little Staffy - Dicey, 17.06.2005 to 1.12.2011- I'll miss you mate.

                              Comment

                              • Bas
                                Veterans List
                                • Jan 2003
                                • 4457

                                Originally posted by Ryan Bomford
                                What's impressing me about this trading period is that the Swans actually seem to have a game plan that they're executing to their advantage. For the time being the other squads just look lost.
                                Seems that way. With our current first pick in the draft being 55, I'd say one of the following will happen tomorrow:

                                1. We will trade for lower picks;
                                2. Barham has tucked a few smokies away in the draft;
                                3. We will delist then re-draft one of our own players again.
                                In memory of my little Staffy - Dicey, 17.06.2005 to 1.12.2011- I'll miss you mate.

                                Comment

                                Working...