#14: A total farce

[Ruck'n'Roll]

Re: Re: Re: #14: A total farce

Originally posted by Piobaireachd
My Kelpie is named Kelly after Paul Kelly

My inlaws had a vicious little mongrel terrier called Monty and they've got no interest in footy.

[Lucky Knickers]

There you have it. As no one has named their pet "Number 14" or
"Number 11" - lets get it back in circulation.

[cressakel]

Originally posted by goswannie14
Skilts wasn't a midfielder IIRC, he was a rover

Skilts wasn't a rover either, he was bloody all 18 positions on the field and then some....

In truth, Skilts was named as Rover back in those days but in reality played the role of Rover, Ruck-Rover, Centre, Forward Pocket & Half-Forward while playing in the middle.

[Ruck'n'Roll]

Originally posted by Charlie
27. Shaw

Either that or #25, I think he could live up to either.

[penga]

Originally posted by Ruckman
Either that or #25, I think he could live up to either.

You rate his rucking ability Ruckman? I have only seen him in the Wizard Cup game this year. What's your take?

[goswannie14]

Originally posted by cressakel
Skilts wasn't a rover either, he was bloody all 18 positions on the field and then some....

In truth, Skilts was named as Rover back in those days but in reality played the role of Rover, Ruck-Rover, Centre, Forward Pocket & Half-Forward while playing in the middle.

...but he was awesome where ever he played...I only saw him in one game, 1970 semi against StKilda, first game I went to...I was 8, so don't remember much of his play, except for what I have seen on TV

[hammo]

Give it to the guy we draft at #52 and get it over and done with

[Nico]

Originally posted by Plugger46
Oh rubbish. Jason Ball's #27? Not a bad player, but don't get too carried away. He's not a retiring champion or anything.

Agreed P46. Why dont we just start all new players on numbers from 50 upwards and retire any under that for posterity.

Then you would prevent dumb threads like this one from surfacing.

[goswannie14]

Originally posted by Nico
Agreed P46. Why dont we just start all new players on numbers from 50 upwards and retire any under that for posterity.

Then you would prevent dumb threads like this one from surfacing.

Why is this thread dumb.....I thought it was passionate Swans supporters talking about their team

[Go Swannies]

Re: Re: Re: Re: #14: A total farce

Originally posted by Ruckman
My inlaws had a vicious little mongrel terrier called Monty and they've got no interest in footy.

Forget them. Can the dog play?

[Rizzo]

Originally posted by ugg
I recently had a dream that Schneider had inherited the #14 and had dyed his hair blonde to mark the occasion.

Then again, I also dreamed that the Socceroos not only qualified for the World Cup but won the whole damn thing.

Keep dreaming Ugg, I like the way things are going!

[tez]

Originally posted by Charlie
Give it to Monty.

If it were to become available I would like it to be given
to Monty.

[punter257]

just give it to someone already - maybe moore or malceski, although it would be add a bit of pressure to them

i do agree about buchanan being a worthy recipient, but i reckon he'd want to carve out his own history in the #32