What's Wrong With Goodes?

[swantastic]

Originally posted by Chow-Chicker
Don't know. Is that whatthey were saying? I would have thought he had his mind more on the job than most but it turned out that he was distracted by the quickness of the play from upfield.

Hope we can switch on this week against those maggots.

he is going after bucks because afl and the tab didnt ask permission to use the mark.

[Chow-Chicker]

Originally posted by swantastic
he is going after bucks because afl and the tab didnt ask permission to use the mark.

Leaping Leo or Goodes?

[swantastic]

Originally posted by Chow-Chicker
Leaping Leo or Goodes?

leo,leo barry you star.

[Chow-Chicker]

Originally posted by swantastic
leo,leo barry you star.

And quite right too!

[giant]

Is someone channeling this thread thru a babelfish?

[Legs Akimbo]

Originally posted by Chow-Chicker
Or a godsend to clever coaches. You see, a smart coach would play an attacking player on Goodes and not a close checking tagger. That attacking player would run where Goodes runs, receive the ball and run off without any fear of being chased. Those useless duds at Essendon did it in the 1st round. Those clowns have not won another game since. We will probably go down as their only win. Mark Bolton ran Goodes a merry dance that night and set up numerous attacks into Lloyd. Everyone blamed Leo Barry, but the amount of easy run throught the midfield Essendon had was ridiculous.

Against St.Kilda, the same thing happened. It's all well and good to be praiseworthy of mazza type play, but we need to be mindfull of set plays and rebounds. It's all too easy to be complacent, and say "she'll be right". But what happens when things turn around and take another shape?

I am impressed by the forcefulness of your argument but remain unconvinced.

[goswannie14]

Originally posted by Legs Akimbo
I am impressed by the forcefulness of your argument but remain unconvinced.

I'm convinced that Sanecow is right, this is Charlie come back to haunt us.

[ugg]

Originally posted by Chow-Chicker
We will probably go down as their only win. Mark Bolton ran Goodes a merry dance that night and set up numerous attacks into Lloyd. Everyone blamed Leo Barry, but the amount of easy run throught the midfield Essendon had was ridiculous.

Hmm, let's see the stats for Mark Bolton that night. 0 kicks 0 handballs 0 marks 0 tackles 0 goals 0 behinds. Oh that's right he didn't play. Sure taught Goodesy a good lesson that night. The phantom Essendon midfield certainly destroyed us. Mercuri ran off Kirk the whole night, Misiti showed Jude how to kick the footy and Tim Watson really made Williams look his age.

[swannieserin]

Originally posted by ugg
Hmm, let's see the stats for Mark Bolton that night. 0 kicks 0 handballs 0 marks 0 tackles 0 goals 0 behinds. Oh that's right he didn't play. Sure taught Goodesy a good lesson that night.

HAHAHAHAHHA best post ever. Ok maybe not. I'm not getting involved in this thread because the whole thing is completely ridiculous, but this is great.

[NMWBloods]

This thread just gets more and more bizarre...

[Legs Akimbo]

Originally posted by goswannie14
I'm convinced that Sanecow is right, this is Charlie come back to haunt us.

Where did he go? Did he die?

[Chow-Chicker]

Originally posted by ugg
Hmm, let's see the stats for Mark Bolton that night. 0 kicks 0 handballs 0 marks 0 tackles 0 goals 0 behinds. Oh that's right he didn't play. Sure taught Goodesy a good lesson that night. The phantom Essendon midfield certainly destroyed us. Mercuri ran off Kirk the whole night, Misiti showed Jude how to kick the footy and Tim Watson really made Williams look his age.

I meant Mark Johnson

[ScottH]

Goodes has never been accountable, but he is usually much more damaging offensively, than anything his opponent can dig up.

Having said that, his defensve work in a number of games this year has been outstanding.

[royboy42]

Goodes is amongst the best attacking footballers I have ever seen..he is NOT a tagger and is the hardest man to cover for opposition coaxches! The problem is theirs not ours..he makes the plays, and most times will beat his man one out..where is ypur problem chow chicker (apart from a tiny inattention to detail)?

[Chow-Chicker]

Originally posted by royboy42
Goodes is amongst the best attacking footballers I have ever seen..he is NOT a tagger and is the hardest man to cover for opposition coaxches! The problem is theirs not ours..he makes the plays, and most times will beat his man one out..where is ypur problem chow chicker (apart from a tiny inattention to detail)?

I think I have spelled it out quite clearly, if you read