Scrap interchange: Lethal

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Brandon
    On the Rookie List
    • Oct 2006
    • 31

    #61
    Will kill off a few of the "specialist" players though, and make it even harder for blokes of all sizes and shapes to make it in the AFL, which is one aspect of AFL that I love. Small forwards, shut-down backs and ruckman are already finding life difficult at the moment, and it'll be only worse with limited/removed interchange.

    Comment

    • NMWBloods
      Taking Refuge!!
      • Jan 2003
      • 15819

      #62
      It may help the 'specialist' players. There may be less full-on running and more playing in position.
      Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.

      "[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."

      Comment

      • ROK Lobster
        RWO Life Member
        • Aug 2004
        • 8658

        #63
        Originally posted by Brandon
        Will kill off a few of the "specialist" players though, and make it even harder for blokes of all sizes and shapes to make it in the AFL, which is one aspect of AFL that I love. Small forwards, shut-down backs and ruckman are already finding life difficult at the moment, and it'll be only worse with limited/removed interchange.
        It's funny, I thought it would be the other way, that with less "midfielders" and I reckon about 14 of the 18 blokes on the paddock are playing as "midfielders" at any one time, there would be more room for the specialists. Dunno though, could go either way.

        Comment

        • Brandon
          On the Rookie List
          • Oct 2006
          • 31

          #64
          Originally posted by ROK Lobster
          It's funny, I thought it would be the other way, that with less "midfielders" and I reckon about 14 of the 18 blokes on the paddock are playing as "midfielders" at any one time, there would be more room for the specialists. Dunno though, could go either way.
          It could go either way, just I reckon with a limited interchange coaches are going to put a high price on versatility to ensure that the midfield has a good number of options at all times. Means you can change the midfield around if you're getting beaten, and when they're tired they interchange with the pockets instead of using up 2 interchanges to bring them off then back onto the ground.

          Originally posted by NMWBloods
          It may help the 'specialist' players. There may be less full-on running and more playing in position.
          I envisage that there might be more playing in position, but it won't be a specialist doing it, but versatile players who can swap between roles as their capacity to run goes up and and down during a match.

          On the other hand football has the most limited interchange (3 per match and replaced players don't come back on) around, and every position is basically a specialist position, so you might be right. That's the other sport which has the most broad range of shapes and sizes even at the elite level.
          Last edited by Brandon; 14 April 2007, 06:05 PM.

          Comment

          • Bloody Hell
            Senior Player
            • Oct 2006
            • 3085

            #65
            Originally posted by Chow-Chicker
            Football causes fatigue.

            And not being able to interchange players that are on the field would make them more fatigued.
            Yes, football does cause fatigue.

            It's a simple enough concept but to explain, different players train differently and attain different levels of fitness, so how fatigue effects them is different, from player to player.

            Coaches implement different strategies that have differing effects on their teams as a whole.

            I have also attached a wikipedia link to the definition of fatigue...hope this helps.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fatigue_%28medical%29

            Nobody is saying that there should be no interchange.
            Last edited by Bloody Hell; 16 April 2007, 01:56 AM. Reason: Drunk
            The eternal connundrum "what happens when an unstoppable force meets an immovable object" was finally solved when David Hasselhoff punched himself in the face.

            Comment

            • goswannie14
              Leadership Group
              • Sep 2005
              • 11166

              #66
              Originally posted by Bloody Hell
              Nobody is saying that there should be no interchange.
              Leigh Matthews is, isn't that the point of this thread?
              Does God believe in Atheists?

              Comment

              • Chow-Chicker
                Senior Player
                • Jun 2006
                • 1602

                #67
                Originally posted by Bloody Hell
                Nobody is saying that there should be no interchange.
                Too many drinks?

                Comment

                • NMWBloods
                  Taking Refuge!!
                  • Jan 2003
                  • 15819

                  #68
                  Originally posted by goswannie14
                  Leigh Matthews is, isn't that the point of this thread?
                  Originally posted by NMWBloods
                  Matthews has suggested two ideas - more interchange (6) and a substitution bench.
                  And other people have suggested going back to two interchange.
                  Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.

                  "[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."

                  Comment

                  • Chow-Chicker
                    Senior Player
                    • Jun 2006
                    • 1602

                    #69
                    Leigh Matthews is saying no interchange. Extend the bench, but only to substitute. So no interchange is what he wants but have an extended subs bench.

                    Comment

                    • NMWBloods
                      Taking Refuge!!
                      • Jan 2003
                      • 15819

                      #70
                      An extended substitution-only bench would make for an interesting change in the game.

                      Or maybe only two interchange and four subs.
                      Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.

                      "[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."

                      Comment

                      • Bloody Hell
                        Senior Player
                        • Oct 2006
                        • 3085

                        #71
                        I meant nobody involved in this conversation was saying no interchange.
                        The eternal connundrum "what happens when an unstoppable force meets an immovable object" was finally solved when David Hasselhoff punched himself in the face.

                        Comment

                        • ROK Lobster
                          RWO Life Member
                          • Aug 2004
                          • 8658

                          #72
                          Originally posted by Bloody Hell
                          I meant nobody involved in this conversation was saying no interchange.
                          OK @@@@ it, I will. No interchange, 60 minute quarters, and play it on rollerskates on asphalt. Let's toughen this game up to a point where even Lethal would appear soft.

                          Comment

                          Working...