judd eye gouging - Charge Confirmed (Gouging)

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • gossipcom
    Senior Player
    • Aug 2003
    • 2585

    #91
    Just bringing this topic back from the dead after this was published today.

    Brown comments trigger AFL probe (Fox Sports)

    Comment

    • swantastic
      Veterans List
      • Jan 2006
      • 7275

      #92
      Originally posted by BBBBH
      at the end of the day...it was probably the right decision, too inconclusive and its hard to be certain judd gouged.

      you would back judd's character as he looks like a pretty decent bloke who wouldn't go to the extent of gouging someones eye.
      Care to rephrase that.
      Now this is a thread that i would expect on the ego -centric, wank session that is redandwhiteonline.com...

      Comment

      • 573v30
        On the bandwagon...
        • Sep 2005
        • 5017

        #93
        Did he lie to get Judd back in Brownlow contention? If that was the case, it sure backfired with Judd sustaining a groin injury and playing his worst footy to date and Brown might get suspended.

        That's what you get when you help "protected species."
        I only support one team: The SYDNEY SWANS!!!!! :adore

        Comment

        • ScottH
          It's Goodes to cheer!!
          • Sep 2003
          • 23665

          #94
          Originally posted by 573v30
          Did he lie to get Judd back in Brownlow contention? If that was the case, it sure backfired with Judd sustaining a groin injury and playing his worst footy to date and Brown might get suspended.

          That's what you get when you help "protected species."
          Karma

          Comment

          • reigning premier
            Suspended by the MRP
            • Sep 2006
            • 4335

            #95
            Just goes to show how protected he is......

            Imagine what would happen if you were in court charged with something, got off and then your star witness recanted and blew your alibi???? You'd be charged again and the "witness" would be charged as well.

            Why hasn't this happened?

            And a fine, IMHO, is a joke. He's made a fool of the AFL and the tribunal and got away with it.

            Wonder if Judd will be tipping in with some cash???

            Comment

            • 573v30
              On the bandwagon...
              • Sep 2005
              • 5017

              #96
              Judd - the next O.J. Simpson.
              I only support one team: The SYDNEY SWANS!!!!! :adore

              Comment

              • Sanecow
                Suspended by the MRP
                • Mar 2003
                • 6917

                #97
                Originally posted by reigning premier
                Imagine what would happen if you were in court charged with something, got off and then your star witness recanted and blew your alibi???? You'd be charged again and the "witness" would be charged as well.
                Actually, you'd only possibly be retried for certain serious crimes in certain states.

                Comment

                • reigning premier
                  Suspended by the MRP
                  • Sep 2006
                  • 4335

                  #98
                  Originally posted by Sanecow
                  Actually, you'd only possibly be retried for certain serious crimes in certain states.
                  I would have thought that perjury was fairly serious.

                  Comment

                  • Sanecow
                    Suspended by the MRP
                    • Mar 2003
                    • 6917

                    #99
                    Originally posted by reigning premier
                    I would have thought that perjury was fairly serious.
                    The double jeopardy princople prevents retrial. Some states have changed their laws - South Australia moved to change their laws this month but:

                    The change to the "double jeopardy" principle will apply only to serious offences such as murder, manslaughter, the most aggravated forms of rape, serious drug offences and armed robbery.
                    Eye gouging doesn't quite rate.

                    Comment

                    • Jewels
                      On the Rookie List
                      • Oct 2006
                      • 3258

                      Originally posted by Sanecow
                      The double jeopardy princople prevents retrial. Some states have changed their laws - South Australia moved to change their laws this month but:



                      Eye gouging doesn't quite rate.
                      I would have thought eye gouging would be right up there in the world of AFL football.

                      Comment

                      • ScottH
                        It's Goodes to cheer!!
                        • Sep 2003
                        • 23665

                        Originally posted by Jewels
                        I would have thought eye gouging would be right up there in the world of AFL football.
                        Either way, I doubt he will be charged again. They seem more concerned with Brown telling the truth about lying.

                        Comment

                        • Sanecow
                          Suspended by the MRP
                          • Mar 2003
                          • 6917

                          Originally posted by ScottH
                          Either way, I doubt he will be charged again. They seem more concerned with Brown telling the truth about lying.
                          He's not really being punished for lying about the incident though - it's a long established football tradition. The mistake he made was admitting it.

                          Comment

                          • ScottH
                            It's Goodes to cheer!!
                            • Sep 2003
                            • 23665

                            Originally posted by Sanecow
                            He's not really being punished for lying about the incident though - it's a long established football tradition. The mistake he made was admitting it.
                            Yes, the old "Did someone hit me? I don't recall." has got many a player off, or reduced sentence.

                            He was silly to admit to it on national TV. Very Silly. I wonder what advice his old man gave him after that show?

                            Comment

                            • Wardy
                              The old Boiler!
                              • Sep 2003
                              • 6676

                              Originally posted by ScottH
                              Yes, the old "Did someone hit me? I don't recall." has got many a player off, or reduced sentence.

                              He was silly to admit to it on national TV. Very Silly. I wonder what advice his old man gave him after that show?
                              the AFL might send him and his Dad over to the US for some "lie rehab" - it worked for a bloke in WA who was known to tell a few fibs about not taking drugs.
                              I used to be indecisive, but now I'm not so sure..................
                              Chickens drink - but they don't pee!
                              AGE IS ONLY IMPORTANT FOR TWO THINGS - WINE & CHEESE!

                              Comment

                              Working...