Don't start this legal bull@@@@ again please.
Roos under investigation (-> Cleared)
Collapse
X
-
haha, this is funny.
You don't need a definition of hearsay, it's pretty obvious.
DeadlyAkkuret saidOne man's word against another's is not hearsay, it's two opposing sides to an event.It seems like hearsay to me, one man's word against another's.
Hearsay is gossip.
Information not obtained directly from the source.The difference between insanity and genius is measured only in success.Comment
-
Correct, hearsay is secondhand information that a witness only heard about from someone else and did not see or hear themselvesComment
-
-
No he didn't. He said he didn't recall saying it but he may have said something like it.
And as the four "witnesses" can't agree on what he said - or who he said it to, and McVeigh says he didn't hear it - but turned and laughed at something - it's far from cut and dried on who said what to who.
And Roos says he may coach from the sideline all season. That'd make boundary mics popular into AFL HQ.Comment
-
Bevo bandwagon driverComment
-
-
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
-
Comment
-
Comment

You have to question the AFL's motives.
Comment