V PA @ SCG Sunday. Out: Davis N In: Barlow E
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by Jude BoltonIt's better to be taken home in an ambulance than take your eyes off the ball.Originally posted by Nick DavisIt's just a game.I knew him as a gentle young man, I cannot say for sure the reasons for his decline
We watched him fade before our very eyes, and years before his timeComment
-
There are so many variables to why Davis may have been dropped but i would Suggest that unless anyone here is on the coaching staff and knows the reason that you all stop thinking emotionaly and bagging them and wait to find out.The edge is not the limit, It's just the starting point...Comment
-
When will you simple people learn that a football team is made up of many diff types of players and these two couldnt be more diff. One is a forward and one is a tagger/defender. So even if you think Davis should be in it wouldnt be at the expense of Bevan would it.Officially on the Reid and Sumner bandwagon!Comment
-
It doesnt look like ATM he is captain material,as he was saying at the start of the year.
Really we need Davo at his best because when he is on song it goes a long way to us winning.Now this is a thread that i would expect on the ego -centric, wank session that is redandwhiteonline.com...
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dr DiabolicalWhat a load of garbage. No one was the matchwinner. Do you think the whole side should be dropped as they failed to do what they're meant to? This has to be one of the most stupid posts I've read on here in quite a while!
Davis is a senior player. I expect that a senior player would have tried a lot bloody harder to kick straight to win the game last weekend.
He had the opportunity - and poor skills lost us the game.Wild speculation, unsubstantiated rumours, silly jokes and opposition delight in another's failures is what makes an internet forum fun.
Blessed are the cracked for they are the ones who let in the light.Comment
-
Originally posted by Dr DiabolicalSnip .... Interestingly, N Davis has similar stats to L Davis and Didak at Collingwood and you don't see Malthouse dumping them as he knows they can do special things that you need on occasion.
I think he's attitude of "it's just a game" is a bit lame for a professional footballer. Yes, to me, it's just a game. To Davo, it should be "just his livelihood".Wild speculation, unsubstantiated rumours, silly jokes and opposition delight in another's failures is what makes an internet forum fun.
Blessed are the cracked for they are the ones who let in the light.Comment
-
JUst reading some comments from Roos in The Australian may shed some light on Nick's dumping.
He mentioned that Barlow came in for Davis because we need more run and carry.
IMO I suspect the Swan's hierachy thinks that Davis does not work hard enough without the ball, the running, chasing and tackling. Not saying I always agree but Nicky D does have that touch of Dale Lewis...very laconic (is that the word?). My wife says he 'loafs' now and then!!Swannies for life!Comment
-
JUst reading some comments from Roos in The Australian may shed some light on Nick's dumping.
He mentioned that Barlow came in for Davis because we need more run and carry.
IMO I suspect the Swan's hierachy thinks that Davis does not work hard enough without the ball, the running, chasing and tackling. Not saying I always agree but Nicky D does have that touch of Dale Lewis...very laconic (is that the word?). My wife says he 'loafs' now and then!!Comment
-
I'm getting a bad feeling about this season already, and it seems Roos is still playing favourites and rewarding those with strong "Bloods Ethos" too much. Play your best side, and get them to attack for once, or piss off to America. It's not THAT difficult, Paul.Comment
-
That is looking at things too simply. The guy who came in, Barlow, is a utility player, able to play as both a forward, back and midfielder. So, Barlow could have replaced Bevan as well. Also, there's a thing called re-arranging a team; you don't have to have the exact same ratio of attacking midfielders to taggers each week. In fact, given that we played so defensively last week, and we did it so badly, dropping a defensive player for an attacking player would be arguably a very good idea.The edge is not the limit, It's just the starting point...Comment
-
No you dont have to keep any ratio but you still need to keep a balance and as said by Roos the match ups probably dont suit against Port and maybe davis contribution wasnt needed as much as Bevan. Defensive is how they play every week which is their strength, but as i said maybe they are just sick of Davis only performing to his ability once in 2 years, of course they wouldnt drop everyone who had a bad or average game but at least most of the players do enough or have a great game alot more often then he does.Comment
-
Originally posted by Dr DiabolicalInterestingly, N Davis has similar stats to L Davis and Didak at Collingwood and you don't see Malthouse dumping them as he knows they can do special things that you need on occasion.The edge is not the limit, It's just the starting point...Comment
Comment