Tim Schmidt

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ugg
    Can you feel it?
    Site Admin
    • Jan 2003
    • 15976

    #16
    Schmidt wouldn't be worth that much. Port's 3rd rounder or some complicated swap of draft picks.
    Reserves live updates (Twitter)
    Reserves WIKI -
    Top Goalkickers| Best Votegetters

    Comment

    • dread and might
      Back, strapped and intact
      • Apr 2004
      • 949

      #17
      Schmidt and fosdike to Port for whatever Essendon wants for Lovett.
      I wish my weed was EMO so it would cut itself

      Comment

      • Lucky Knickers
        Fandom of Fabulousness
        • Oct 2003
        • 4220

        #18
        Originally posted by Yakety_Yak
        Haha are u serious? err reality check!

        Schneider / Dempster 07 for 26!
        Mattner for 28

        Now if Swans got Ports 2nd round circa pick 19 for them ? then maybe worth it!
        Thanks YY - needed that.
        I think we should lock that one in.

        Comment

        • NMWBloods
          Taking Refuge!!
          • Jan 2003
          • 15819

          #19
          What's the point in swapping Schmidt for a late draft pick?
          Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.

          "[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."

          Comment

          • Lucky Knickers
            Fandom of Fabulousness
            • Oct 2003
            • 4220

            #20
            So we can stick in the brown paper bag for Kerr.

            Comment

            • TheMase
              Senior Player
              • Jan 2003
              • 1207

              #21
              Originally posted by NMWBloods
              What's the point in swapping Schmidt for a late draft pick?
              Exactly, especially given Roos attitude to the draft.

              I hope he stays.

              Comment

              • TheGong
                Pushing for Selection
                • Mar 2008
                • 58

                #22
                Originally posted by NMWBloods
                What's the point in swapping Schmidt for a late draft pick?
                Completely agree.

                Tim Schmidt is a good player but he has fallen behind Bird and Moore as an inside midfielder. I think there is a good chance he will make it as an AFL player if given the opportunity.

                I think we should look to trade him for a similar calibre player. I would preferably trade with Freemantle who appear to need midfield depth and have a surplus in positions we are lacking. Schmidt for Campbell or Murphy would be a good trade. Both appear to be good players but have Pavlich, McPharlin, Tarrant etc in front of them.

                Brisbane and Collingwood also seem to require depth in their midfields.

                Comment

                • caj23
                  Senior Player
                  • Aug 2003
                  • 2462

                  #23
                  would be very annoyed if we trade schimidt and keep ablett or crouch

                  Comment

                  • Lucky Knickers
                    Fandom of Fabulousness
                    • Oct 2003
                    • 4220

                    #24
                    I think if Schmidt wants an opportunity to play consistent senior footy he should go. I can't see him being a regular first 22 at the swans therefore why not look for a new home for him and get something else we can use to trade on.
                    If Schmidt is happy to stay at Sydney then great - I like him. I would think tho' that he may want to try his hand elsewhere to get more of an opportunity.

                    Comment

                    • Mr Magoo
                      Senior Player
                      • May 2008
                      • 1255

                      #25
                      I reckon there might be a few guys like Scmidt who may be getting a little annoyed at Roos continued allegiance to the likes of Ablett, Crouch, Everitt etc while getting precious little game time in firsts except the add cameo.

                      Not that these same bunch of reserves players have been absolute stand outs but it very difficult to really judge any players AFL ability based on a game here or there (and against the likes of Geelong) and schmidt etc might be feeling like their chance is passing them by.

                      Port would be a logical choice for Schmidt and / or fosdike due to the home town factor and I could understand them wanting to leave if more game time was promised and the swans were not exactly showing a lot of interest.

                      Comment

                      • Captain
                        Captain of the Side
                        • Feb 2004
                        • 3602

                        #26
                        We must keep Schmidt!

                        Should trade O'Keefe + our first round pick for Kerr.

                        Comment

                        • goswannie14
                          Leadership Group
                          • Sep 2005
                          • 11166

                          #27
                          Originally posted by Captain
                          We must keep Schmidt!

                          Should trade O'Keefe + our first round pick for Kerr.
                          O'Keefe is worth more than Kerr on the trade table, your suggestion means we lose big time.
                          Does God believe in Atheists?

                          Comment

                          • Plugger46
                            Senior Player
                            • Apr 2003
                            • 3674

                            #28
                            Originally posted by Captain
                            We must keep Schmidt!

                            Should trade O'Keefe + our first round pick for Kerr.
                            Kerr's a star and I'd love to have him but he's not worth that much.
                            Bloods

                            "Lockett is the best of all time" - Robert Harvey, Darrel Baldock, Nathan Burke, Kevin Bartlett, Bob Skilton

                            Comment

                            • Robbo
                              On the Rookie List
                              • May 2007
                              • 2946

                              #29
                              Schmidt is a better player than Ablett. No question about it IMO.

                              But the reality is that he's a fair chance to be delisted, especially if we promote rookies.

                              Comment

                              • Cant turn right
                                Warming the Bench
                                • Dec 2007
                                • 231

                                #30
                                Originally posted by Captain
                                We must keep Schmidt!

                                Should trade O'Keefe + our first round pick for Kerr.
                                We have to keep O'Keefe; in the last couple of games his fast playing on and delivery to Hall alone is enough to keep him.

                                Comment

                                Working...