Swans offer Kerr 5 years
Collapse
X
-
-
the biggest thing that concerns me about that article is not the Kerr talk...more so the fact that Roos isn't sure about O'Keefe staying"We talked five times. I called him twice, and he called me twice." :confused: :confused: :confused: :D
Eddie McGuireComment
-
Kerr is an absolute gun, but i can't see how we could get him without robbing Peter to pay Paul (Roos)."As a player he simply should not have been able to do the things he did. Leo was a 185cm, 88kg full-back and played on some of the biggest, fastest and best full-forwards of all time, and constantly beat them." Roos.
Leo Barry? you star! We'll miss ya, ''Leapin''.Comment
-
Comment
-
Who do we lose? Pick 11 and O"Keefe.
Normally that would be OK lose quality to get quality BUT it's Kerr we're talking about. He would make an enormous on field difference but off field baggage is not good.In memory of my little Staffy - Dicey, 17.06.2005 to 1.12.2011- I'll miss you mate.Comment
-
The difference between insanity and genius is measured only in success.Comment
-
That's hypocrisy of the highest order. I usually let it go when you crap on about Bevan but in this case, pull your head in.
You can't advocate one of these guys being OK and entitled to an opportunity with the Swans, and then say the other is not. There is no difference between the two as far as I can see. The only difference is that Kerr is a better, proven player.
FWIW, I say go get Kerr!Bevo bandwagon driverComment
-
i'm really honoured that you have stirred to comment on my modest contribution. i can (can't -is this a rule???) make a distinction between off field violence and drug use and their relative affects on sport. The difference is not that Kerr is a better player but that drugs and sport, whether so-called recreational or performance enhancing destroy the integrity of the game. That's why there is an organization called WADA. It is such a boring old piece of rag to accuse someone of hypocracy in argument. The old ad hominem argument, doesn't prove anything. To accuse someone of hypocracy in an argument is really pretty hopeless. I think you mean inconsistent?Officially on the Reid and Sumner bandwagon!Comment
-
If we're going for Kerr, we might as well make a place for Cousens. Don't want either of them to get lonely. After all I'm sure they have contacts in Sydney.
We don't have to give anybody up for Benny boy.In memory of my little Staffy - Dicey, 17.06.2005 to 1.12.2011- I'll miss you mate.Comment
-
Comment
-
Not sure if this is tongue in cheek or not, but it does pose the question - Why pay dearly for Kerr when we could grab Cousins for a song?10100111001 ;-)Comment
-
There is critical difference. Having a conversation with a suspected drug dealer talking about trying out Ketamine is part of the difference. Ketamine is not an innocuous "recreational" drug. Ketamine is a powerful drug commonly misused by weightlifters and bodybuilders. Ketamine is also a notorious "date rape drug. It is also commonly used by ecstacy users to help them sleep. It was first used as a "recreational"drug by US soldiers in the Vietnam war. Dosages at relatively low levels lead to energy rushes and euphoria. Ketamine is a stimulant at a low dose and therefore can improve sports performance. This is an insidious form of cheating. And therefore destroys the integrity of sport. And of course it has also been shown to cause permanent changes in the brain of rats.Last edited by connolly; 25 September 2008, 10:52 PM.Bevo bandwagon driverComment
-
It is so obvious it hardly needs repeating. Drug use (whether so-called "recreational" or performance enhancing) is a serious type of cheating in sport. Thats why athletes are subjected to drug testing but not asked "when did you stop beating your wife".Bevo bandwagon driverComment
-
Comment
-
And I know you're going to argue that recreational drugs ARE often performance enhancing. Can't be bothered having that argument. I'm pretty sure we've had it before anyway.Officially on the Reid and Sumner bandwagon!Comment
Comment