Club Champion Night

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • RogueSwan
    McVeigh for Brownlow
    • Apr 2003
    • 4602

    #46
    Originally posted by ugg
    ...
    - Kirk top 2 finish 6 years in a row, surely that's as good a record in the AFL over the same time period.
    Scott West could be around that mark
    "Fortunately, this is the internet, so knowing nothing is no obstacle to having an opinion!." Beerman 18-07-2017

    Comment

    • 2005
      : IN THE OUTER :
      • Dec 2007
      • 604

      #47
      Great effort by Macca and well done to Kirky.
      He had a breakout year and hopefully become an elite player which will make a few on here eat their words.
      Great effort by Paul Bevan as well, shows what he means to our team and whether people like it or not Connollys opinion on him is valid and correct.
      He is one of our most imoportant players in our club now and will further develop over the coming years.

      Suprised with Teddys performance though.
      Est 1874
      SMFC
      09.18.33.2005

      Comment

      • ScottH
        It's Goodes to cheer!!
        • Sep 2003
        • 23665

        #48
        I hope we've heard the last of "McHack" now!!

        Comment

        • Swannette
          Regular in the Side
          • Jan 2003
          • 832

          #49
          ......and Darren Jolly's wife is due in a couple of weeks (another girl he told me), Crouchie was pretty smashed on the dancefloor but certainly having fun, just like every other year, but the new kings of the Gen Y boppers are Jesse White and Matt O'Dwyer who took to the floor at the end clenching red roses with their teeth, trying to be very Antonio Banderras as they twirled a couple of potential WAGS (the poor girls didn't quite know what hit them) to within an inch of their long skinny legs. Many of the other boys were looking on with much amusement but it looked like these 2 enjoyed being in the limelight. Then someone, I think it was Jesse, took to the vacant microphone for a spot of rapping (is that what you call making drum noises?? I dunno...) so if he fails on the field, the stage beckons. Night over, I walked passed a very bemused looking Stuey who looked at me with rolling eyes and we both shook our heads and declared being confounded by the young people of today!!

          A great night
          Patterns emerge, but do they mean anything? No.

          Comment

          • TheMase
            Senior Player
            • Jan 2003
            • 1207

            #50
            Beatboxing I think it is called?

            Comment

            • Bear
              Best and Fairest
              • Feb 2003
              • 1022

              #51
              Adam goods is our best player. Our only genuine superstar.

              He breaks the lines and can win a game with his brilliance. With his groin injury went any real glimmer of hope for a GF appearance.

              Paul Roos rules the football department. He is a lot stronger individual behind closed doors than on camera. It is ironic that his initials are PR. What he says goes. If he says to the dept that we need to see X Y and Z re giving B&F votes, they all fall into line.

              Paul Roos, for better or worse, clearly has his favourites, and judges certain players very harshly. Maybe it's in part the 'effort' factor.

              37 and 2 come to mind immediately when I think of players who are judged harshly by Roos.
              "As a player he simply should not have been able to do the things he did. Leo was a 185cm, 88kg full-back and played on some of the biggest, fastest and best full-forwards of all time, and constantly beat them." Roos.
              Leo Barry? you star! We'll miss ya, ''Leapin''.

              Comment

              • BSA5
                Senior Player
                • Feb 2008
                • 2522

                #52
                Originally posted by Bear
                Adam goods is our best player. Our only genuine superstar.

                He breaks the lines and can win a game with his brilliance. With his groin injury went any real glimmer of hope for a GF appearance.

                Paul Roos rules the football department. He is a lot stronger individual behind closed doors than on camera. It is ironic that his initials are PR. What he says goes. If he says to the dept that we need to see X Y and Z re giving B&F votes, they all fall into line.

                Paul Roos, for better or worse, clearly has his favourites, and judges certain players very harshly. Maybe it's in part the 'effort' factor.

                37 and 2 come to mind immediately when I think of players who are judged harshly by Roos.
                You have to be kidding. I mean yes, fair enough, there's no doubt Roos has a lot of influence and all that, but in regards to Goodes? Goodes has won two Skiltons under Roos. Roos frequently refers to him as our "best player", even though, to be perfectly honest, I think Kirk and O'Keefe are more important to our side, and quite a few would agree. Suggesting that Roos has something against Goodes is simply ridiculous.
                Officially on the Reid and Sumner bandwagon!

                Comment

                • ScottH
                  It's Goodes to cheer!!
                  • Sep 2003
                  • 23665

                  #53
                  Originally posted by BSA5
                  You have to be kidding. I mean yes, fair enough, there's no doubt Roos has a lot of influence and all that, but in regards to Goodes? Goodes has won two Skiltons under Roos. Roos frequently refers to him as our "best player", even though, to be perfectly honest, I think Kirk and O'Keefe are more important to our side, and quite a few would agree. Suggesting that Roos has something against Goodes is simply ridiculous.
                  Bear didn't state Roos had something against Goodes, just that he judges him harshly. I think they are two different things.

                  Comment

                  • liz
                    Veteran
                    Site Admin
                    • Jan 2003
                    • 16778

                    #54
                    I don't think there's much doubt that the B&F system has something of a "handicap' about it. Players will be rated by the coaches on what they expect them to do (and what role they are given) just as much as by any absolute standard.

                    Comment

                    • dimelb
                      pr. dim-melb; m not f
                      • Jun 2003
                      • 6889

                      #55
                      Originally posted by 2005
                      Great effort by Macca and well done to Kirky.
                      He had a breakout year and hopefully become an elite player which will make a few on here eat their words.
                      Great effort by Paul Bevan as well, shows what he means to our team and whether people like it or not Connollys opinion on him is valid and correct.
                      He is one of our most imoportant players in our club now and will further develop over the coming years.

                      Suprised with Teddys performance though.
                      I agree with all this except re Connolly's opinion, which is way over the top, always entertaining to read and long may it continue!
                      He reminds him of the guys, close-set, slow, and never rattled, who were play-makers on the team. (John Updike, seeing Josh Kennedy in a crystal ball)

                      Comment

                      • satchmopugdog
                        Bandicoots ears
                        • Apr 2004
                        • 3691

                        #56
                        Excellent ,entertaining thread ...thanks for the insiders slant on things.

                        Loved the comment on the whole body reconstruction for Tadhg.
                        "The Dog days are over, The Dog days are gone" Florence and the Machine

                        Comment

                        • BSA5
                          Senior Player
                          • Feb 2008
                          • 2522

                          #57
                          Originally posted by ScottH
                          Bear didn't state Roos had something against Goodes, just that he judges him harshly. I think they are two different things.
                          That's what I meant. Something against Goodes that would lead him to judge Goodes harshly.
                          Officially on the Reid and Sumner bandwagon!

                          Comment

                          • Dogzbody
                            On the Rookie List
                            • Jul 2008
                            • 282

                            #58
                            Originally posted by liz
                            I don't think there's much doubt that the B&F system has something of a "handicap' about it. Players will be rated by the coaches on what they expect them to do (and what role they are given) just as much as by any absolute standard.
                            I think Liz has it perfectly right. Roos would be harder on Goodes because he expects so much from him. Effectively his benchmark is higher than others.

                            I tend to think the same applies to Davis, Roos knows what he is capable of, and doesnt accept that he won't/doesn't deliver it.
                            "We talked five times. I called him twice, and he called me twice." :confused: :confused: :confused: :D

                            Eddie McGuire

                            Comment

                            • Nico
                              Veterans List
                              • Jan 2003
                              • 11339

                              #59
                              I'm not saying I begrudge McVeigh winning but he had some stellar games but some pretty ordinary ones too, and if he came around 4th then I would have said fair enough. I thought Kirk was clearly our best and most consistent.

                              On Ted, I am not surprised, he played some very loose games and was moved into the forward line in a number of games, not to give the forward line a spark, but to hide him from his errors.

                              As much as Jude improved this year I can't have him 4th. He wasn't as good as ROK by a long way and Bevan, Jolly and Kennelly were far more effective.
                              http://www.nostalgiamusic.co.uk/secu...res/srh806.jpg

                              Comment

                              • Nico
                                Veterans List
                                • Jan 2003
                                • 11339

                                #60
                                Originally posted by Dogzbody
                                I think Liz has it perfectly right. Roos would be harder on Goodes because he expects so much from him. Effectively his benchmark is higher than others.

                                I tend to think the same applies to Davis, Roos knows what he is capable of, and doesnt accept that he won't/doesn't deliver it.

                                I reckon Roos is hard on Goodes because of his mental application and the fact that he is so talented he sees him as wasting a season, and he has got every right to feel that way being someone who never wavered from the match day discipline for all of his 300+ games. As a coach it must be very frustrating to observe this. If Goodes had his head right over the last couple of seasons he would have had a chance of 4 Brownlows.
                                http://www.nostalgiamusic.co.uk/secu...res/srh806.jpg

                                Comment

                                Working...