Geez, the club (for I think it's them that name best players) must be absolutely in love with Gordon. Last time a top-up player (albeit a scholarshipped one) got named our BOG for the reserves? Even more remarkable in a side that has 2 or 3 real older heads.
Even by the Swans' sometimes-generous standards (see: Davis, Smokey; James, Heath), to carry a guy into 2010 who still hasn't proved he can consistently hold a spot at the top level, when the dude was picked up in the 2003 draft, would be kind of absurd. But equally, why on earth would we sack a guy who is well-ensconced in our best 22 and playing good footy? So there is a massive 8 weeks coming up, for Tim Schmidt's career. Indications are that he's going to be given a chance.
Even by the Swans' sometimes-generous standards (see: Davis, Smokey; James, Heath), to carry a guy into 2010 who still hasn't proved he can consistently hold a spot at the top level, when the dude was picked up in the 2003 draft, would be kind of absurd. But equally, why on earth would we sack a guy who is well-ensconced in our best 22 and playing good footy? So there is a massive 8 weeks coming up, for Tim Schmidt's career. Indications are that he's going to be given a chance.

Comment