Rd 17, 2010 Demons V Swans Pre-Game Discussion (with Teams)

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • liz
    Veteran
    Site Admin
    • Jan 2003
    • 16773

    #31
    I think it partly reflects the fact we started the season with three tall forward targets and not many genuine smaller forwards (resting mids or otherwise) and maybe the fact that McGlynn was injured for quite a while. But we don't have an abundance of small, pacy tackling machines and we have observed how easily the ball often rebounds from our forward 50.

    It is actually a positive, in a way, that we are quite poor at this area because it is something that can be addressed - if not in the next two months, certainly in the next year or so. You don't need an abundance of top draft picks to be able to improve this facet of the game. If we were struggling to take contested marks inside forward 50, win centre clearances, or win ruck hit-outs, it is not quite as easy to address. (I have no idea where we sit in these stats BTW - not suggesting these are strengths per se, just illustrations of harder things to address.)

    Comment

    • ShockOfHair
      One Man Out
      • Dec 2007
      • 3668

      #32
      It also seems to confirm what has been in the case in some games where (eg, Collingwood) where our kick-ins are easily trapped and the opposition's kick-ins glide easily through our forward defensive setup.
      The man who laughs has not yet heard the terrible news

      Comment

      • johnno
        On the Rookie List
        • Apr 2008
        • 1102

        #33
        I honestly cant remember the last time we played the Demons in Melbourne.

        Must be some time ago?

        Comment

        • Auntie.Gerald
          Veterans List
          • Oct 2009
          • 6480

          #34
          given that Mcviegh and Smithy were out for 2/3 of the game each approx..............we did extremely well against a solid team (carlton)..............I can wait to see what we can do in the second half against Melbourne with 22 healthy players.........

          Lets rock !!
          "be tough, only when it gets tough"

          Comment

          • giant
            Veterans List
            • Mar 2005
            • 4731

            #35
            It's interesting coz the forward pressure mantra has been such a touchstone for commentators, and presumably coaching staff, that you would think it's been discussed at the Swans. Still, it may be one of those stats that actually doesn't stand up to deeper scrutiny - when I look at the way footy is won and lost these days, things like field kicking efficiency, conversion rates, tackle counts and the quality of your clearances seem way more important (as well as the generally incalculable "intensity" level!).

            Comment

            • Plugger46
              Senior Player
              • Apr 2003
              • 3674

              #36
              Originally posted by johnno
              I honestly cant remember the last time we played the Demons in Melbourne.

              Must be some time ago?
              Yeah, normally played home games against us in Canberra. I reckon 2006 was the last time.
              Bloods

              "Lockett is the best of all time" - Robert Harvey, Darrel Baldock, Nathan Burke, Kevin Bartlett, Bob Skilton

              Comment

              • ScottH
                It's Goodes to cheer!!
                • Sep 2003
                • 23665

                #37
                Originally posted by johnno
                I honestly cant remember the last time we played the Demons in Melbourne.

                Must be some time ago?
                Rnd 19, 2006 (12, aug). MCG
                Swans 95-63.

                A young H Grundy, played his 4th game.

                Comment

                • Margo
                  On the Rookie List
                  • Jul 2009
                  • 138

                  #38
                  Back to Shaw. The commentators on Ch 7 were saying that the forward can push the defender in the back as long as it is with the forearms or/and (unsure) with fists, not open hands. Is that right ? Makes it sound much easier to get rid of your opponent. And if so, why don't they all do that ? I thought Shaw did that several times with no free against so maybe it is right. Yes, I am naive.

                  Comment

                  • Triple B
                    Formerly 'BBB'
                    • Feb 2003
                    • 6999

                    #39
                    Originally posted by Margo
                    Back to Shaw. The commentators on Ch 7 were saying that the forward can push the defender in the back as long as it is with the forearms or/and (unsure) with fists, not open hands. Is that right ? Makes it sound much easier to get rid of your opponent. And if so, why don't they all do that ? I thought Shaw did that several times with no free against so maybe it is right. Yes, I am naive.
                    Margo, it is such a grey area.

                    The general current interpretation appears to be you can't actually 'push' regardless of whether you use hands or forearm, but you can sort of hold your position by placing a forearm firmly in their back to stop them pushing back but you cannot place your hands in their back to stop them coming back.

                    Of course, that is this weeks interpretation and next weeks may be entirely different.
                    Driver of the Dan Hannebery bandwagon....all aboard. 4th April 09

                    Comment

                    • dimelb
                      pr. dim-melb; m not f
                      • Jun 2003
                      • 6889

                      #40
                      Originally posted by Triple B
                      Margo, it is such a grey area.

                      The general current interpretation appears to be you can't actually 'push' regardless of whether you use hands or forearm, but you can sort of hold your position by placing a forearm firmly in their back to stop them pushing back but you cannot place your hands in their back to stop them coming back.

                      Of course, that is this weeks interpretation and next weeks may be entirely different.
                      That seems to be the current position. Mind you, on Sunday a couple of times Shaw used his body sideways to knock the defender out of the way, which (I understand) is perfectly OK.
                      He reminds him of the guys, close-set, slow, and never rattled, who were play-makers on the team. (John Updike, seeing Josh Kennedy in a crystal ball)

                      Comment

                      • gumby_bolts
                        Warming the Bench
                        • Jul 2006
                        • 255

                        #41
                        Any news on Bevan? Looked like a pretty nasty knock on his shoulder and he couldn't shake hands with his right fter the game.

                        Comment

                        • liz
                          Veteran
                          Site Admin
                          • Jan 2003
                          • 16773

                          #42
                          Originally posted by dimelb
                          That seems to be the current position. Mind you, on Sunday a couple of times Shaw used his body sideways to knock the defender out of the way, which (I understand) is perfectly OK.
                          Any action where the opponent is unfairly prevented from competing for a mark is meant to be against the rules, though there is inconsistency in application. The umpires seem to use a "one motion" / "two motion" criterion to distinguish, although again not entirely consistently. I thought Rhys' mark was OK because he used his arm to launch himself backwards to take the mark and didn't really push his opponent forward per se.

                          If you watch the mark which Eddie took coming in from the side in the Blues' goal square, you will see a Swan (Mattner I think) clearly being pushed off balance as the ball was arriving, not by Betts but by another Blue. Whether Mattner could have effected a spoil had he not been pushed out of the way is debateable, but was definitely a clear push and softer ones have been paid. (Not that I am claiming we were hard done by overall - we weren't.)

                          Comment

                          • TheHood
                            On the Rookie List
                            • Jan 2003
                            • 1938

                            #43
                            I think if Sydney enter this game with complete respect for the Demons, then the lift should get the Swans the chocolates. There are many teams this year that have paid no heed to the Demons and gotten jumped or just beaten because they do have heart and play with great enthusiasm and free-wheeling ways.

                            It's encumbant upon the Swans to teach the young Demons the meaning of pressure and accountability the hard way, I think a 45 point loss should do the trick.
                            The Pain of Discipline is Nothing Like The Pain of Disappointment

                            Comment

                            • Peace
                              On the Rookie List
                              • Mar 2010
                              • 598

                              #44
                              would be good to see both Jettas play

                              Comment

                              • Matt79
                                Bring it on!
                                • Sep 2004
                                • 3143

                                #45
                                Bringing 9 other staff members down from Sydney (most Leagies) for a footy (lads) weekend in Melbourne. Each has brought a Swannies Polo which has been embroided to remember the weekend. Just hope we win!
                                Swannies for life!

                                Comment

                                Working...